Skip to content

Cryo-ultrasound Versus LASER Therapy on Ankle Sprain in Tennis Players

Cryo-ultrasound Versus LASER Therapy on Ankle Sprain in Tennis Players

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06766318
Enrollment
40
Registered
2025-01-09
Start date
2024-02-09
Completion date
2024-10-25
Last updated
2025-01-14

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Ankle (Ligaments); Instability (Old Injury)

Keywords

cryoultrasound, laser, Ankle sprain, Tennis players, Elite girl

Brief summary

the effect cryo-ultrasound therapy and LASER therapy on the short-term recovery of tennis players with acute lateral ankle sprains.

Detailed description

Acute lateral ankle sprains are common injuries among athletes, but the optimal treatment strategies in elite athletes are still debated. This proof-of-concept study aimed to assess the impact of cryo-ultrasound therapy and LASER therapy on the short-term recovery of tennis players with acute lateral ankle sprains.

Interventions

DEVICEgroup A will receive cryo-ultrasound therapy combined with conventional physical therapy for two months

Cryo-ultrasound therapy combines two therapeutic methods: cryotherapy (using cold) and ultrasound (using sound waves). The ultrasound component provides a therapeutic heating effect, improving blood circulation and tissue flexibility, while the cold component reduces pain and inflammation

DEVICELASER therapy

group B will receive LASER therapy combined with conventional physical therapy.

Sponsors

October 6 University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
FACTORIAL
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
12 Years to 16 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age ranged from 12-16 years. * elite girls; * semi-professional tennis players; * I-II grade lateral ankle sprain injury; * no persistent instability phenomena or chronic sprains; * acute injury (within 2 weeks from trauma); * no evidence of bone edema or skin disorder, once the area of intense pain in motion was delimited, the lack of neurological disturbances was investigated and assessed.

Exclusion criteria

* history of recurrent dislocation of the ankle or hyperlaxity of any joint; * severe rheumatic diseases and/or collagen diseases; * athletes who have received any form of local physical therapy and NSAIDs within the last 2 months prior to injury; * athletes who admit to using steroids; * any contraindication and/or limitation to the use of a physical agent modality (implantable electrophysiological devices, active neoplasms). Taking medications. * Athletic adult.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Pain intensity a2 monthsWe will assess pain intensity before and after intervension by numeric pain rating scale, which is numerical from 0 indicate no pain and 10 indicate the worest pain
Foot and Ankle Disability Index2 monthsFoot and Ankle Disability Index (FADI) at baseline (T0) at the end of treatment (T1), after one month (T2), and two months after treatment (T3).

Countries

Egypt

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026