Skip to content

Impact of Ultrasound in Obstetric Anesthesia Central Blocks

The Impact of Ultrasound Use in Central Block Applications in Obstetric Anesthesia

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06761222
Enrollment
100
Registered
2025-01-07
Start date
2022-06-15
Completion date
2023-05-20
Last updated
2025-01-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Anesthesia

Keywords

Regional Anesthesia, Central Block, Obstetrics, Ultrasound

Brief summary

This study aimed to evaluate the use of ultrasound in obstetric anesthesia, specifically for measuring epidural and intrathecal distances in pregnant women undergoing cesarean section. The relationship between skin-subdural distance (Ultrasound depth) and needle depth was assessed, and the accuracy of ultrasound in determining needle entry site, needle distance, trial attempts, and block success was examined. Additionally, complications such as paresthesia, lower back pain, and postoperative headache were queried and recorded.

Detailed description

Obstetric anesthesia generally posed low risks; however, the difficulty of the procedure and the potential complications increased due to the anatomical and physiological changes associated with pregnancy. The aim of study was to measure epidural and intrathecal distances in pregnant women undergoing cesarean sections and to evaluate the relationship between the skin-subdural distance (Ultrasound depth) and needle depth. The investigator assessed the accuracy of Ultrasound in determining the needle entry site, needle distance (measured at the site where cerebrospinal fluid flow occurred or where there was a loss of resistance in the epidural space), trial numbers, and block success. Additionally, occurrences of paresthesia and lower back pain during the procedure, as well as postoperative headaches following dural puncture, were queried and recorded. After obtaining approval from the Ege University Faculty of Medicine Ethical Committee, the study was prospectively conducted in the operating room of the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology at Ege University Hospital. One hundred pregnant women classified as ASA I-II, between 37-42 gestational weeks, undergoing elective cesarean sections with neuraxial blocks (spinal and/or epidural), were included after obtaining their consent.

Interventions

OTHERThe use of ultrasound in central blocks

Ultrasonography was conducted using a convex probe in the paramedian and transverse planes.

Sponsors

Ege University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients classified as ASA I-II * Patients at 37-42 gestational weeks * Patients scheduled for elective cesarean section under neuraxial block (spinal and/or epidural)

Exclusion criteria

* Patients who did not consent to spinal anesthesia * Patients with contraindications for regional anesthesia (coagulopathy, local or systemic infection) * Emergency patients

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Investigating The Skin-to-subdural/epidural Distance and Needle Depth in Central Block applicationsPreoperativeThe Use of Ultrasonography in Central Block Applications in Obstetric Patients

Countries

Turkey (Türkiye)

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026