Skip to content

Using Anonymous Data From A Digital Tool for Medical History-Taking To Improve Healthcare Services

Observation Of The Use Of Digital Tools for Medical History-Taking in Primary Care and Utilization of Anonymous Routine Data for Health Services Research

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06761105
Enrollment
20
Registered
2025-01-07
Start date
2025-05-01
Completion date
2033-12-01
Last updated
2026-05-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Services Research

Keywords

digital medical history, anonymized usage data, general practice, GP consultations, GP, health services research

Brief summary

This study aims to understand how people use a mobile app that helps them record their symptoms before going to the doctor. Patients use the app on a tablet or other digital device. The app guides patients through a series of structured questions tailored to their symptoms. The data collected is then transferred to the practice's electronic record and is available to the treating doctor before and during the consultation. In this project, anonymized usage data will be analyzed to contribute to the further development of the tool and to provide valuable insights for health services research.

Detailed description

In several studies the usability of digital medical history tools has been demonstrated. These tools allow acute complaints to be recorded using an app before a medical consultation and the data collected to be transferred to the electronic medical record. The aim of the study is to investigate the effectiveness and use of a digital medical history tool that is becoming increasingly popular in general practice. To this end, it is aimed to evaluate anonymized usage data provided by the company that distributes the app, aidminutes gUG, as part of an observational study with the aim of identifying potential for further development and for questions of health services research (e.g. on the frequency of GP consultations, morbidity and frequency of complaints). This is a retrospective data analysis of anonymous routine data in a cross-sectional design.

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

University Hospital Goettingen
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
CASE_ONLY
Time perspective
RETROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* all patients that use the app in a general practice that agreed to provide data * all ages (including children if the app is used by parent or legal guardian) * all complaints chosen in the app

Exclusion criteria

* patients that use the app in a general practice that did not agree to provide data * patients that use the app in a general practice outside of the federal state Lower Saxony

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Use patternsFrom enrollment to the end of app use, up to 8 yearsEvaluation of the use patterns and frequencies of the medical history tool

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Data qualityFrom enrollment to the end of app use, up to 8 yearsInvestigation of the consistency and completeness of the medical history data collected by the medical history tool

Countries

Germany

Contacts

CONTACTFrank Müller, MD PhD
frank.mueller@med.uni-goettingen.de+495513965663
CONTACTEva Maria Noack
evamaria.noack@med.uni-goettingen.de+495513965745

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: May 7, 2026