Skip to content

Reflective Mindfulness and Emotional Regulation Training to Enhance Nursing Students' Self-Awareness, Understanding, and Regulation

Reflective Mindfulness and Emotional Regulation Training to Enhance Nursing Students' Self-Awareness, Understanding, and Regulation: a Mixed Method Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06760962
Enrollment
40
Registered
2025-01-07
Start date
2023-01-01
Completion date
2024-04-20
Last updated
2025-01-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Undergraduate Health Professional Students

Keywords

Mindfulness, emotional regulation, nursing students, nursing education, self-awareness, mixed method

Brief summary

This study assessed the impact of a six-week Reflective Mindfulness and Emotional Regulation Training (RMERT) program on fourth-year nursing students. Using a randomized controlled trial with 40 participants, the intervention group (n=20) received RMERT, while the control group (n=20) continued standard coursework.

Detailed description

This study evaluated the effectiveness of Reflective Mindfulness and Emotional Regulation Training (RMERT) in enhancing nursing students' self-awareness, emotional understanding, and regulation. Nursing students frequently face significant academic and psychological challenges, particularly in mental health nursing courses, which can lead to stress, anxiety, and compromised well-being. RMERT was designed as a psychoeducational intervention integrating mindfulness and emotional regulation techniques to help students develop critical skills for managing these challenges. Study Design The randomized controlled trial employed a mixed-methods approach and involved 40 fourth-year undergraduate nursing students at Benha University. Participants were randomly allocated into an intervention group (n=20) and a control group (n=20). The intervention group attended a six-week RMERT program, while the control group continued their standard academic activities without additional interventions. Both groups underwent pre- and post-intervention assessments using validated instruments: the Emotion Regulation Questionnaire (ERQ) and the Mindful Attention Awareness Scale (MAAS). Qualitative data, collected exclusively from the intervention group, were analysed thematically. Intervention The RMERT program consisted of six weekly 90-minute sessions facilitated by researchers trained in cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) and transactional analysis (TA). The training employed the ABC model of CBT (activating events, beliefs, and consequences) to address maladaptive cognitive patterns, along with TA techniques such as empathic inquiry and reflection. Relaxation strategies, including diaphragmatic breathing and progressive muscle relaxation, were also integrated. The sessions focused on enabling students to reflect on their mental and emotional states, process their feelings, and apply cognitive reappraisal-a healthy emotional regulation strategy-instead of relying on expressive suppression, which is maladaptive.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALReflective Mindfulness and Emotional Regulation training

The RMERT program consisted of six weekly 90-minute sessions facilitated by researchers trained in cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) and transactional analysis (TA). The training employed the ABC model of CBT (Activating events, Beliefs, and Consequences) to address maladaptive cognitive patterns, along with TA techniques such as empathic inquiry and reflection. Relaxation strategies, including diaphragmatic breathing and progressive muscle relaxation, were also integrated. The sessions focused on enabling students to reflect on their mental and emotional states, process their feelings, and apply cognitive reappraisal-a healthy emotional regulation strategy-instead of relying on expressive suppression, which is maladaptive.

Sponsors

Benha University
CollaboratorOTHER
Alexandria University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator)

Masking description

Forty students met the eligibility requirements and were randomly assigned at a 1:1 ratio to control and intervention groups of twenty each. The intervention set was then split into ten subgroups to form counseling groups. The intervention and control groups completed the pre-test and post-tests one week before the sessions began and one week after they ended. Students' identifiers were removed to ensure confidentiality. In two subgroups of 10, each intervention group attended intervention sessions, while the control group did not receive any intervention sessions. During the intervention sessions, both groups attended the theoretical and clinical parts of the psychiatric mental health nursing course with their colleagues. As part of their training, they facilitated nursing services for actual patients in clinical settings.

Intervention model description

The RMERT program consisted of six weekly 90-minute sessions facilitated by researchers trained in cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) and transactional analysis (TA). The training employed the ABC model of CBT (Activating events, Beliefs, and Consequences) to address maladaptive cognitive patterns, along with TA techniques such as empathic inquiry and reflection. Relaxation strategies, including diaphragmatic breathing and progressive muscle relaxation, were also integrated. The sessions focused on enabling students to reflect on their mental and emotional states, process their feelings, and apply cognitive reappraisal-a healthy emotional regulation strategy-instead of relying on expressive suppression, which is maladaptive.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Students enroled in the psychiatric/mental health nursing course for the first time, i.e., did not enrol in or join similar or the same course before. * for example, joined the faculty from the secondary school, not through other paths or bridging educational programs that would include psychiatric/mental health courses/modules as part of their programs * did not fail the course before or attended it for more time.

Exclusion criteria

no

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Emotion Regulation Questionnaire6 weeksRespondents answer each item on a 7-point Likert-type scale ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 7 (strongly agree). The scoring takes the average of all the scores in each subscale. The higher the score, the greater the use of that strategy and vice-versa.
The Mindful Attention Awareness Scale (MAAS)6 weeksThe Mindful Attention Awareness Scale (MAAS), developed by Brown and Ryan in 2003, is a 15-item self-report instrument designed to measure a fundamental aspect of mindfulness: a receptive and attentive state of awareness focused on the present moment. Respondents rate their experiences using a six-point Likert scale, ranging from 1 (almost always) to 6 (rarely). The MAAS has demonstrated strong psychometric properties and has been validated across diverse populations, including college students, community members, and individuals with cancer. The overall score is calculated as the average of the 15 items, with higher scores reflecting greater mindfulness.

Countries

Egypt

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 5, 2026