Chronic Visceral Pain, Clinical Efficacy, Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging, IBS (Irritable Bowel Syndrome), Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation
Conditions
Brief summary
Objectives: To identify a central hub of visceral pain in IBS-D and elucidate the mechanism by which repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) confers analgesic effects. Methods: A total of 42 IBS-D patients were recruited and randomly assigned (1:1) to the sham rTMS or the rTMS group. A nested cohort of 21 IBS-D participants who completed baseline fMRI assessments prior to randomization was included. Consistent with the randomization procedure，these individuals were evenly distributed between the two groups. Both participants and outcome assessors remained blinded to treatment allocation throughout the study. All patients completed the two-week intervention and were included in the final analysis.
Detailed description
Background：Chronic visceral pain in irritable bowel syndrome with diarrhea (IBS-D) is a profound therapeutic challenge. While aberrant central processing is implicated, the key brain regions driving this visceral pain and their suitability as neuromodulatory targets remain undefined. Methods: Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to the sham rTMS or rTMS group using a computer-generated randomization sequence created by an independent researcher who was not involved in recruitment, treatment, or outcome assessment. Allocation concealment was ensured using sequentially numbered, opaque, sealed envelopes, which were opened only after baseline evaluations were completed. Both participants and outcome assessors were blinded to treatment allocation. The rTMS operators were not involved in data collection or analysis. For the sham condition, the coil was positioned identically over the mPFC with magnetic output disabled, and prerecorded clicking sounds were delivered to mimic the acoustic sensation of stimulation. Participants were asked not to discuss treatment sensations with assessors. Scale raters and fMRI analysts remained blinded until all analyses were finalized. For the nested fMRI cohort, randomization and blinding procedures were identical, with group allocation revealed only after preprocessing and statistical analysis had been completed.
Interventions
DEVICERepetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation
A figure-of-eight coil is used to apply active low-frequency (1 Hz) rTMS to the corresponding representation area of theprefrontal cortex (mPFC). The treatment is administered for 20 minutes daily for a total of 2 weeks.
DEVICESham (No Treatment)
For the sham rTMS group, the coil was placed over the mPFC with the rTMS function disabled, and pre-recorded acoustic artifacts were played to mimic the auditory experience of the rTMS group.
Sponsors
The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
All diagnoses were made by board-certified gastroenterologists. Eligible participants met the following inclusion criteria: (1) age between 18 and 75 years; (2) fulfillment of the Rome IV diagnostic criteria for IBS-D.
Exclusion criteria
included: (1) presence of inflammatory or other organic gastrointestinal diseases; (2) diagnosed psychiatric disorders; (3) history of anorectal, intestinal, or abdominal surgery; (4) pregnancy or lactation; (5) presence of metallic implants or cardiac pacemakers.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Visceral Sensitivity Index | 2 weeks of treatment | (1) Clinical control: After the course of treatment, clinical symptoms disappear; (2) Significant effect: After the course of treatment, the symptom grading is reduced by 2 levels; (3) Effective: After the course of treatment, the symptom grading is reduced by 1 level; (4) Ineffective: After treatment, those who do not meet the above standards. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| IBS-symptom severity score | 2 weeks of treatment | The criteria were based on the IBS Symptom Severity Score (IBS-SSS), a hierarchical efficacy assessment method.The IBS-SSS consists of five entries assessing the degree of abdominal pain and discomfort, frequency of bdominal pain episodes, the degree of abdominal distension and discomfort, the degree of satisfaction with bowel habits and behaviors, and the degree of impact of intestinal symptoms on life,with a total score of 500 points. A score of 75-175 is considered mild, 176-300 is moderate, and over 300 is severe. Cure was defined as a total IBS symptom severity of less than 75; efficacy was defined as 2-level improvement in total score(e.g., symptoms improved from severe to mild); validity was defined as a 1-level improvement in tatal(e.g., symptoms improved from severe to moderate or symptoms from moderate to mild); and invalidity was defined as no improvement or deterioration in total score. |
Other
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| anorectal manometry | 2 weeks of treatment | Anorectal manometry was performed on the subjects before and after treatment and the subjects' rectal primary sensory thresholds were recorded. Rectal initial sensory thresholds between 20-90ml were considered normal , less than 20ml was considered as sensitivity rectal sensory, and cure meant that the IBS patients had their rectal initial sensory recordings restored to between 20-90ml. |
Countries
China
Contacts
Primary ContactRuixia Weng, Dr.
Outcome results
None listed