Skip to content

Effects of Intraoperative Glycemic Management Strategies Assisted With RT-CGM on TIR and Postoperative Recovery

Effects of Intraoperative Glycemic Management Strategies Assisted With RT-CGM on TIR and Postoperative Recovery During Pancreaticoduodenectomy: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06755788
Enrollment
246
Registered
2025-01-01
Start date
2025-01-01
Completion date
2026-02-09
Last updated
2026-07-09

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Continuous Glucose Monitoring

Keywords

glycemic management, pancreaticoduodenectomy, time in range

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to investigate the effect of intraoperative blood glucose management based on real-time continuous glucose monitoring ( RT-CGM) on time in range (TIR) and postoperative recovery during pancreaticoduodenectomy. The primary outcome is intraoperative TIR. Additionally, it aims to compare the differences in other glucose metrics, quality of postoperative recovery, and 30-day postoperative complications and mortality between the two glycemic management methods .

Detailed description

Pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) is the standard surgical procedure for treating malignancies of the pancreatic head, distal bile duct, and periampullary region. Due to its extensive scope, high demands for anastomosis, and prolonged operative time, PD is considered one of the most complex surgeries in general surgery. Perioperative management of PD presents unique challenges, particularly in glycemic control. In addition to stress-induced hyperglycemia caused by surgery, Patients with PD are more prone to perioperative glycemic disturbances compared to other surgeries. The main reasons include insulin resistance, resection of pancreatic tissue during surgery, and early postoperative nutritional support. However, perioperative glycemic management guidelines often receive limited attention. Several studies have reported low adherence to recommendations for glycemic monitoring and insulin administration among healthcare professionals. This issue is also evident during the perioperative period of PD, where demanding workloads may lead to neglect of glycemic management, and insulin therapy poses risks of hypoglycemia. Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) technology uses subcutaneous electrodes to monitor interstitial glucose levels electronically. RT-CGM provides continuous, comprehensive, and reliable glycemic data, capturing trends and fluctuations in glucose levels, and identifying hidden hyperglycemia and hypoglycemia. It overcomes the limitations of traditional glucose monitoring, such as pain from finger pricks, delayed assessments, and an inability to reflect glucose variability. The latest diabetes guidelines in China and the United States incorporate Time in Range (TIR), derived from CGM, as a new metric for glycemic control. CGM is gradually being used in glycemic management for diabetic patients, and its efficacy and safety have been consistently demonstrated in randomized controlled trials and real-world studies. A randomized controlled trial involving 299 patients with type 2 diabetes showed that CGM improved TIR by 7.9% over 12 months compared to fingerstick glucose monitoring. Pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) is the standard surgical procedure for treating malignancies of the pancreatic head, distal bile duct, and periampullary region. Due to its extensive scope, the high demands for anastomosis, and prolonged operative time, PD is considered one of the most complex surgeries in general surgery. Perioperative management of PD presents unique challenges, particularly in glycemic control. In addition to stress-induced hyperglycemia caused by surgery, patients undergoing PD are more susceptible to perioperative glycemic disturbances than those undergoing other types of surgery. The primary factors contributing to this include insulin resistance, the resection of pancreatic tissue during surgery, and early postoperative nutritional support. However, perioperative glycemic management guidelines often receive limited attention, with several studies reporting poor adherence to recommendations for glycemic monitoring and insulin administration among healthcare professionals. This issue is particularly evident during the perioperative period of PD, where heavy workloads may lead to neglect of glycemic management, and insulin therapy may increase the risk of hypoglycemia. Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) technology uses subcutaneous electrodes to electronically monitor interstitial glucose levels. Real-time CGM (RT-CGM) provides continuous, comprehensive, and reliable glycemic data, capturing glucose trends and fluctuations while identifying hidden hyperglycemia and hypoglycemia. It overcomes the limitations of traditional glucose monitoring, such as pain from finger pricks, delayed assessments, and an inability to reflect glucose variability. Both China and the United States have incorporated Time in Range (TIR) from CGM data as a key metric for glycemic control in their latest diabetes guidelines. CGM is increasingly used for managing glycemia in diabetic patients, with its efficacy and safety consistently demonstrated in randomized controlled trials and real-world studies. For instance, a randomized controlled trial with 299 patients with type 2 diabetes found that CGM improved TIR by 7.9% over 12 months compared to fingerstick glucose monitoring. In recent years, the use of CGM has expanded to hospitalized patients, and its adoption is growing in clinical settings. However, compared to medical inpatients and ICU patients, surgical patients rarely use CGM, and studies on its use during surgery are limited. CGM systems measure interstitial glucose every minute and provide real-time alerts for values outside the target range. These alerts help clinicians intervene promptly to manage perioperative hyperglycemia or hypoglycemia, minimizing risks and reducing the burden of traditional blood glucose testing on both patients and medical staff. This study explores the benefits of CGM-assisted glycemic management during PD, promoting dynamic and precise glycemic control during PD.

Interventions

DEVICERT-CGM

In the RT-CGM group, patients will wear a CGM sensor the day before surgery. Before entering the operating room, capillary blood glucose will be measured and compared with CGM interstitial glucose values for calibration. The target range for intraoperative blood glucose management is 3.9-10.0 mmol/L, with arterial blood gas measurements required at least every 2 hours. Following the administration of insulin or glucose, arterial blood gases should be retested at least every hour. RT-CGM monitoring will also be employed during surgery. A tablet in the operating room will be configured with low and high glucose alerts set at 3.9 mmol/L and 10.0 mmol/L, respectively. When an alarm is triggered, arterial blood gases will be rechecked, and glucose levels will be adjusted based on the arterial blood glucose results. If interstitial glucose values do not reach the intervention threshold, arterial blood gas measurements are recommended every 30 minutes.

DEVICEControl

In the control group, patients will wear a CGM sensor the day before surgery. Before entering the operating room, capillary blood glucose will be measured and compared with CGM interstitial glucose values for calibration. The target range for intraoperative blood glucose management is 3.9-10.0 mmol/L, with arterial blood gas measurements required at least every 2 hours. Following the administration of insulin or glucose, arterial blood gases should be retested at least every hour. CGM monitoring will also be employed during surgery, but the CGM interstitial glucose readings and alerts will be masked during the operation. The final intraoperative glucose management approach will be determined by the anesthesiologist, considering the patient's condition and surgical circumstances. The anesthesiologist can choose the intravenous insulin adjustment protocol we recommend.

Sponsors

Peking Union Medical College Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

The study is blinded to participants; however, it is not feasible to blind the surgeons and anesthesiologists. The outcome assessors remain blinded to the group allocation.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age ≥ 18 * Scheduled for pancreaticoduodenectomy * ASA classification I-III

Exclusion criteria

* Emergency surgery * scheduled for MRI the day before surgery * Allergy to CGM sensor * Communication barriers or refusal to participate * BMI \< 18.5 kg/m²

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Intraoperative time in range (TIR)during surgeryTime in range (TIR) from CGM generally refers to the percentage of time that glucose levels stay within a target range (3.9-10 mmol/L)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Intraoperative insulin dosageduring surgeryunit
Intraoperative time above range (TAR)during surgeryTime above range (TAR) from CGM generally refers to the percentage of time glucose levels exceed the upper limit of the target range (\>180 mg/dL).
Intraoperative time below range (TBR)during surgeryTime below range (TBR) from CGM generally refers to the percentage of time glucose levels fall below the lower limit of the target range (\<70 mg/dL).
Intraoperative mean glucoseduring surgeryThe average glucose level recorded by the CGM over a specified period
Intraoperative coefficient of variation (CV)during surgeryCoefficient of variation (CV) from CGM generally refers to the degree of fluctuation in glucose levels, typically expressed as a percentage of the coefficient of variation.
Postoperative time in range (TIR)Throughout the 72 hours after surgeryTime in range (TIR) from CGM generally refers to the percentage of time that glucose levels stay within a target range (3.9-10 mmol/L)
Postraoperative time above range (TAR)Throughout the 72 hours after surgeryTime above range (TAR) from CGM generally refers to the percentage of time glucose levels exceed the upper limit of the target range (\>180 mg/dL).
Postoperative time below range (TBR)Throughout the 72 hours after surgeryTime below range (TBR) from CGM generally refers to the percentage of time glucose levels fall below the lower limit of the target range (\<70 mg/dL).
Postoperative mean glucoseThroughout the 72 hours after surgeryThe average glucose level recorded by the CGM over a specified period
Postoperative coefficient of variation (CV)Throughout the 72 hours after surgeryCoefficient of variation (CV) from CGM generally refers to the degree of fluctuation in glucose levels, typically expressed as a percentage of the coefficient of variation.
Quality of Recovery-15 score on the third day after surgeryon the third day after surgeryUsing Quality of Recovery-15 questionnaire to evaluate the quality of perioperative recovery. Quality of Recovery-15 consists of 15 comprehensive questions, including physical comfort (5 items), psychological support (2 items), physical independence (2 items), emotional state (4 items), and pain (2 items), each item is scored with 0-10 points, 0 represents poor state, 10 represents good state, and the total score ranging from 0 to 150 is the Quality of Recovery-15 score of the patient. A higher score indicates a better quality of recovery.
The rate of surgery-related complications30 days after surgerysurgery-related complications including clinically relevent postoperative pancreatic fistula,bile leakage,chyle leak,postpancreatectomy hemorrhage,abdominal infection,delayed gastric emptying.
Quality of Recovery-15 score on the 30th day after surgeryon the 30th day after surgeryUsing Quality of Recovery-15 questionnaire to evaluate the quality of perioperative recovery. Quality of Recovery-15 consists of 15 comprehensive questions, including physical comfort (5 items), psychological support (2 items), physical independence (2 items), emotional state (4 items), and pain (2 items), each item is scored with 0-10 points, 0 represents poor state, 10 represents good state, and the total score ranging from 0 to 150 is the Quality of Recovery-15 score of the patient. A higher score indicates a better quality of recovery.

Countries

China

Contacts

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORLe Shen, PhD

Peking Union Medical College Hospital

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Jul 10, 2026