Irreversible Pulpitis (toothache)
Conditions
Keywords
RCT, garlic oil, natural remedies, primary molars, root canal filling material
Brief summary
The goal of this study is to test garlic oil mixed with zinc oxide as a potential root canal filling material of primary molars in children aged from four to eight years. the study hypothesized that garlic oil mixed with zinc oxide would be the same as the gold standard filling material (metapex). The group receiving the garlic oil with zinc oxide as root canal filling material will be compared with other similar group receiving metapex as root canal filling material in terms of clinical and radio-graphic success, and working time.
Detailed description
This study is a randomized clinical trial (RCT), that aims compare the clinical and radio-graphic success of garlic oil mixed with zinc oxide, used as root canal filling material in primary molars in children aged from four to eight years, with the conventional root filling material, which is metapex.
Interventions
COMBINATION_PRODUCTGarlic oil
garlic oil mixed with zinc oxid powder, as root canal filling material
Metapex as root canal filling materials
Sponsors
Cairo University
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Outcomes Assessor)
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
4 Years to 8 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes
Inclusion criteria
1. Primary second molars which are diagnosed with irreversible pulpitis, or pulp necrosis. 2. Presence of sinus tract. 3. Periapical bone swelling. 4. Continuous bleeding after amputation of the coronal pulp tissue. 5. No pulp tissue remains when the pulp chamber is accessed. 6. Pus discharges from the canal. 7. Radiographically, only primary molars with at least two-thirds of the root length. 8. Presence of inter-radicular or periapical radiolucency.
Exclusion criteria
1\. A tooth with internal root resorption will not be included. 2. Excessive tooth mobility beyond healing. 3. Carious perforation in the pulpal flour. 4. A tooth with a pathological lesion extending to the successor's tooth germ. 5. Non-restorable primary molars. \-
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| The clinical success rate | 3, 6,9,and 12 months | The criteria of successful treatment, according to which the clinical evaluation will be done, will be No abnormal mobility, No sensitivity to percussion, and No swelling |
| Radio-graphic success | 6, and 12 month. | For the radiographic success, the evaluation criteria will be Preoperative pathological inter-radicular and/or periapical radiolucency started to resolve, or remained the same size, No new postoperative pathological radiolucency developed, and No pathological internal or external root resorption |
Contacts
Primary ContactMennat Allah A. A. Elkareem
Outcome results
None listed