Competency-Based Education, Patient-Centered Care
Conditions
Keywords
Patient safety, WHO Surgical Safety Checklist, Team communication, Stress management, Protocol adherence, Risk assessment, Operating room simulations
Brief summary
Simulation-based training has emerged as a valuable tool for enhancing communication skills among healthcare professionals. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of operating room (OR) simulations on the development of communication skills for patient safety. The study focused on two key areas: the development of communication skills for patient-centered care and the role of the WHO Surgical Safety Checklist in enhancing communication and patient safety during simulations.
Detailed description
This study will provide valuable insights into student preferences for logbook formats in anesthesiology education, specifically within the MEDI 045 course. By comparing Excel sheet logbooks with traditional paper logbooks, it aims to elucidate how different documentation methods impact student engagement, satisfaction, and learning outcomes. Understanding these preferences is crucial, as logbooks are not merely administrative tools but integral components of the educational experience that promote reflection, accountability, and skill development in clinical practice. The findings will contribute to existing knowledge by identifying specific advantages and disadvantages of each format, highlighting the aspects that enhance or hinder student learning. Moreover, the research will inform curriculum designers and educators about effective strategies for logbook implementation, ultimately leading to improved educational tools that better align with students' needs
Interventions
OTHEROperating Room Simulation Training
The intervention involves high-fidelity OR simulations focusing on critical areas of patient safety, including: Communication Skills: Emphasizing clear communication during surgical procedures. Stress Management: Training participants to manage stress effectively in high-pressure situations. Protocol Adherence: Practicing adherence to the WHO Surgical Safety Checklist. Risk Assessment: Identifying and mitigating potential safety risks in simulated scenarios
Sponsors
King Saud Medical City
Study design
Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 25 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes
Inclusion criteria
Participants must be medical students enrolled in the MEDI 045 course at King Saud University. Must have prior exposure to basic patient safety and communication skills training. Age: 18-25 years. Students must voluntarily consent to participate in the study and complete the required simulations and assessments.
Exclusion criteria
Students who have already completed formal simulation-based training on communication or patient safety outside the MEDI 045 curriculum. Students are unable to participate in simulation sessions due to scheduling conflicts or medical reasons. Participants were unwilling to provide informed consent.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Improving Patient Safety Training through Simulation | 7-8 months | Evaluate the effectiveness of simulation-based training in promoting patient safety with a focus on: Authenticity: Scenarios mirroring real operating room environments. Stress Management & Communication: Improving interpersonal dynamics, team synergy, and decision-making under pressure. Protocol Compliance & Risk Evaluation: Ensuring adherence to patient safety best practices. WHO Surgical Safety Checklist: Enhancing communication and protocol adherence. Evaluation Tool: Patient Safety Simulation Assessment Scale (PSSAS). Scale Range: 0-10 Criteria: 0-3: Minimal improvement. 4-6: Moderate improvement. 7-8: Significant improvement. 9-10: Excellent improvement. Higher scores indicate better outcomes. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Improvement in Communication Skills during Simulations | 7-8 months | Evaluate the enhancement of communicative competencies, placing particular emphasis on: Clarity of Communication: The proficiency in transmitting information with efficacy. Teamwork: The synergy and coordination exhibited within the group. Adherence to Structured Communication Protocols: The implementation of standardized tools such as SBAR (Situation-Background-Assessment-Recommendation). Measurement Tool: A bespoke Structured Communication Skills Evaluation Checklist (SCSEC) will be employed. Scale Range: 0-10 Scoring Criteria: 0-3: Insignificant clarity and teamwork, accompanied by inadequate adherence to protocols. 4-6: Moderate clarity and teamwork, coupled with partial compliance to protocols. 7-8: Robust clarity and teamwork, characterized by commendable adherence to protocols. 9-10: Exemplary clarity and teamwork, demonstrating complete adherence to protocols. Elevated scores signify superior outcomes. |
Countries
Saudi Arabia
Contacts
Primary ContactWalid M Badwi, MD
Backup Contactjumana B BAAJ, consultant
Outcome results
None listed