Skip to content

Evaluation of the Grasp Site After Peeling of Epiretinal Membranes

Evaluation of the Grasp Site After Peeling of Epiretinal Membranes With Different ILM Forceps - a Prospective Randomized Study

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06753539
Enrollment
58
Registered
2024-12-31
Start date
2023-05-12
Completion date
2024-12-01
Last updated
2025-02-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Epiretinal Membrane

Brief summary

The goal of this study is to compare the novel ILM sharkskin forceps with a conventional ILM forceps utilizing iOCT assistance during surgery at this grasp site. The main questions it aims to answer are: 1. are there differences in grasp attempts between both forceps 2. are there differences in Instrument tissue interactions between both forceps 3. are there differences in postsurgical anatomical and functional outcomes at the grasp site between both forceps.

Detailed description

Epiretinal membranes are a disease of the retinal surface, that may affect visual acuity acuity and cause metamorphopsia, occurring in approximately 20% of the population older than 60 years. Using vitrectomy with membrane peeling, postoperative improvement of visual acuity and metamorphopsia may be achieved in a majority of patients. The surgical method has been used for some time, the first report on the surgical method of vitrectomy with membrane peeling dates back to 1978, and since the introduction of intraoperative optical coherence tomography (iOCT), intraoperative iatrogenically induced changes in retinal tissue can be detected and correlated with postoperative changes. Our group has been able to record stretching of the retinal tissue using this technique and has also been able to record the rarely occurring subfoveal and extrafoveal elevations of the ellipsoidal zone due to membrane peeling. These changes did not significantly affect postoperative visual acuity in our study population but did affect the development of postoperative microscotomas. Besides retinal stretching during surgery, ILM peeling is shown to be another factor with association of new postoperative microscotomas. New postoperative microscotomas developed in some patients without retinal stretching and ILM peeling. Apart from these already known iatrogenic changes, the analysis of the grasp site at the starting point of epiretinal membrane peeling is of great interest, because at this location, grasping of the epiretinal membrane may be difficult especially in case of an adherent ERM and superficial retinal lesions may be induced. Diaz et al. demonstrated that there are postoperative changes in the nerve fiber layer after ILM peeling, but in that study, no recording of instrument/tissue interactions was performed using iOCT. The aim of this study is to compare the novel ILM sharkskin forceps with a conventional ILM forceps utilizing iOCT assistance during surgery at this grasp site.

Interventions

DEVICEILM forceps - membrane grasping

grasping the epiretinal membrane at the starting location, using pinch peeling, is performed with an ILM forceps.

Sponsors

Prim. Prof. Dr. Oliver Findl, MBA
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Intervention model description

Patients were operated on using either an ILM forceps with a laser-modified microstructure on the branches (group A) or a conventional ILM forceps (group B). Patients are randomized to both groups.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Idiopathic ERM * Sheduled surgery (vitrectomy with membrane peeling), as defined by vision loss and/or metamorphopsia * Age 18 and older * Written informed consent for participation in the study

Exclusion criteria

* Macular edema due to other reasons than iERM * Pregnancy (pregnancy test will be performed in women of reproductive age)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
grasp attemptsduring surgerynumber of attemps needed for opening the epiretinal membrane during grasping

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
microscotomatabefore and 3 months after surgeryNew deep microscotomata is tested with microperimetry
Thinning of the ganglion cell layerbefore and 3 months after surgeryThinning of the ganglion cell layer is assessed with optical coherence tomography
metamorphopsiabefore and 3 months after surgeryPresence of metamorphopsia is tested with the Amsler grid and M-charts
Best corrected distant visual acuitybefore and 3 months after surgeryBest corrected distant visual acuity is assessed by EDTRS-charts
OCT biomarkersbefore surgeryOCT biomarkers are assessed by optical coherence tomography
Central subfield thicknessbefore and 3 months after surgeryCentral subfield thickness of the macula is assessed with optical coherence tomography

Countries

Austria

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026