Skip to content

A Study Comparing Dexcom Continuous Glucose Monitoring to Point of Care Glucose Testing for the Management of Hospital and Post-Discharge Subjects With Type 1 Diabetes

A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Dexcom Continuous Glucose Monitoring to Point of Care Glucose Testing for the Management of Hospital and Post-Discharge Subjects With Type 1 Diabetes

Status
Recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06752928
Enrollment
100
Registered
2024-12-31
Start date
2025-05-12
Completion date
2026-10-31
Last updated
2025-10-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Type 1 Diabetes

Keywords

Continuous Glucose Monitoring, Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus, Point of Care

Brief summary

This study aims to compare inpatient glycemic control by measuring the percentage of time in the range of 70-180 mg/dl and the frequency of hypoglycemia between Dexcom G7 Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM) and Point of Care (POC) Blood Glucose Testing in poorly controlled subjects with Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus. The main question it aims to answer is: -Whether there is a difference between POC testing (standard of care) and Real-time CGM in glycemic control and hypoglycemic events during hospitalization:

Detailed description

The CDC reports that 1.6 million U.S. adults (5.7%) have type 1 diabetes (T1D), with hospitalization rates three times higher than the general population, primarily due to diabetes-related complications such as ketoacidosis and cardiovascular disease. A study at Emory University found that hospitalized T1D patients are younger, experience longer stays and more admissions, and face worse glycemic control and higher rates of hypoglycemia compared to type 2 diabetes (T2D) patients. Point-of-care (POC) capillary glucose testing is the standard for monitoring hospitalized diabetes patients, but continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) offers more detailed glycemic profiles. Research, including trials using Dexcom CGM systems, has demonstrated CGM's superior ability to detect hypo- and hyperglycemia, reduce hypoglycemic events, and improve insulin therapy adjustments in T2D patients. However, no randomized controlled studies have evaluated the best glucose monitoring system for hospitalized T1D patients. The proposed study aims to compare POC testing with Dexcom G7 CGM for guiding insulin therapy in hospitalized T1D patients. Researchers hypothesize that CGM will better prevent hypoglycemia and improve glycemic management during hospital stays, addressing a critical gap in evidence regarding glucose control's impact on T1D hospital outcomes.

Interventions

DEVICEDexcom G7 rtCGM

The Dexcom G7 Continuous Glucose Monitoring System (Dexcom G7 CGM System or G7) is a glucose monitoring system that continuously measures glucose in the interstitial fluid. It aids in the detection of episodes of hyperglycemia and hypoglycemia, facilitating both acute and long-term therapy adjustments

DIAGNOSTIC_TESTCapillary Blood glucose Testing (POC)

POC glucose meters measure whole blood and convert the results to plasma glucose concentrations, which is the standardized form used in clinical practice.

Sponsors

DexCom, Inc.
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Emory University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

Research design Adult subjects with T1D admitted to non-ICU medicine and surgery units and receiving insulin therapy will be randomized to either standard POC testing or Dexcom G7 CGM to guide insulin dose adjustments, with the POC group wearing a blinded CGM and the CGM group having insulin adjustments based on daily glucose profiles.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Known history of T1D treated with insulin therapy (human regular or rapid-acting analogs or ultra-rapid analogs \[lispro, aspart, glulisine, fast-acting insulin aspart, insulin lispro\]), intermediate-acting (NPH and premixed formulations) or long-acting basal (glargine, detemir, degludec) formulations. * Admission diagnosis of T1D with poorly controlled diabetes (blood glucose \> 180 mg/dl, HbA1c \> 7%), including diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) and hyperglycemic hyperosmolar state (HHS). * Expected length of hospital stay \> three days at the time of randomization

Exclusion criteria

* Patients admitted to the ICU * Subjects using CGM technology before admission * Subjects with type 2 diabetes * Treatment with systemic immunosuppressive agents * Cystic fibrosis * Prisoners * Patients expected to require MRI procedures during hospitalization. * Female subjects who are pregnant or breastfeeding at enrollment into the study. * Subjects not willing to wear a CGM device * Subjects with clinically relevant hepatic disease (diagnosed liver cirrhosis and portal hypertension) and end-stage kidney disease (eGFR\< 30 ml/min), or terminal illness. * Subjects with a history of cognitive impairment, dementia, or mental condition rendering the subject unable to understand the nature and consequences of the study

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Clinically significant hypoglycemia <54 mg/dlThrough study completion (Day 10 or the length of admission)The difference between blood sugar levels in POC testing (standard of care) group and rtCGM group during hospitalization
Glycemic controlThrough study completion (Day 10 or the length of admission)The total difference in blood sugar levels between the POC testing (standard of care) group and the rtCGM group throughout the hospitalization

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Time below rangeThrough study completion (Day 10 or the length of admission)% time in Below Target range (TBR). Differences between the both groups will be calculated. Differences between the both groups will be calculated. (TBR, \< 70 and 54 mg/dl)
Glycemic Variability [% Coefficient of Variation (%CV)Through study completion (Day 10 or the length of admission)% coefficient of variation will be measured during the intervention phase, compared to control, as measured by CGM.
Hypoglycemic eventsThrough study completion (Day 10 or the length of admission)Number of hypoglycemia events \< 70 and 54 mg/dl
Hyperglycemic eventsThrough study completion (Day 10 or the length of admission)Number of hypoglycemia events \>250 mg/dl
Prolonged hypoglycemiaThrough study completion (Day 10 or the length of admission)Number of events of Prolonged hypoglycemia \< 70 mg/dl for more than 2 hours by CGM
Hospital ComplicationsThrough study completion (Day 10 or the length of admission)Hospital complications include a composite of acute kidney injury (doubling of serum creatinine \>0.5 mg/dl from baseline), cardiovascular events, infections, and death
Recurrent hypoglycemiaThrough study completion (Day 10 or the length of admission)Number of recurrent hypoglycemic episodes (\< 70 mg/dl)
Recurrent hyperglycemiaThrough study completion (Day 10 or the length of admission)Number of recurrent hyperglycemic episodes (\>250 mg/dl)
Nocturnal hypoglycemiaThrough study completion (Day 10 or the length of admission)Number of hypoglycemic events (\<70 and \<54 mg/dl) between 22:00 and 06:00
Time above rangeThrough study completion (Day 10 or the length of admission)% time above Target Above range (TAR). Differences between the both groups will be calculated. (TAR, \>250 mg/dl)

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Clinically significant hypoglycemiaThrough study completion (Day 10 or the length of admission)Number of clinically significant hypoglycemic episodes: \<54 mg/dl

Countries

United States

Contacts

Primary ContactGuillermo Umpierrez, MD
geumpie@emory.edu404-778-1665

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026