Skip to content

Effects Of Maitland's Mobilization At Mid Versus End Range In Knee Osteoarthritis Patients

Effects Of Maitland's Mobilization At Mid Versus End Range On Pain, Range Of Motion And Functional Disability In Patients With Knee Osteoarthritis.

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06751095
Enrollment
44
Registered
2024-12-27
Start date
2025-01-10
Completion date
2025-06-30
Last updated
2024-12-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Knee Osteoarthritis

Keywords

joint range of motion, knee osteoarthritis

Brief summary

Knee Osteoarthritis (OA) is the most common form of arthritis affecting mostly elderly people contributing to major cause of disability worldwide.In knee osteoarthritis Maitland's manual therapy technique could be the most effective technique among all in decreasing pain sensitivity and increasing range of motion in knee OA.The aim of this study to compare effects of Maitland's mobilization at mid range versus end range on pain. range of motion and functional disability in patients with knee OA, providing useful insights for healthcare professionals to optimize treatment strategies and enhance outcomes in this context.

Detailed description

Knee Osteoarthritis (OA) is the most common form of arthritis affecting mostly elderly people contributing to major cause of disability worldwide.In knee osteoarthritis Maitland's manual therapy technique could be the most effective technique among all in decreasing pain sensitivity and increasing range of motion in knee OA.The aim of this study to compare effects of Maitland's mobilization at mid range versus end range on pain. range of motion and functional disability in patients with knee OA, providing useful insights for healthcare professionals to optimize treatment strategies and enhance outcomes in this context. This Randomized Clinical Trial will be conducted at DHQ Gujrat through consecutive sampling technique on 44 patients which will be allocated using simple random sampling through sealed opaque enveloped into (Group A and Group B).Maitland's mobilization at end range(Group A) incorporates the end range Maitland's mobilization,strengthening exercises, knee isometrics, transcutaneous electrical stimulation(TENS) and heating pad . Maitland's mobilization in Mid range (Group B) will be treated with Mid range Maitland's mobilization, TENS,strengthening exercises,knee isometrics and heating pad.Outcomes, encompassing pain levels, range of motion(ROM), and functional disability will be evaluated through Visual analogue scale (VAS),Goniometer and WOMAC scale.The treatment plan spans 4 weeks, comprising 3 sessions per week. Data will be analyzed during SPSS software version 25. After assessing normality of data by Shapiro-wilk test, it will be decided either parametric or non-parametric test will be used within a group or between two groups. Data will be collected at baseline and after 4 weeks of follow up.

Interventions

OTHERMaitland's Mobilization in End range

End-range mobilization will be performed individually in flexion and extension end range of the tibiofemoral joint .(0-135 degree)

OTHERMaitland's mobilization in Mid range

Mid range Maitland's mobilization will be performed in (approx. 50-70° knee flexion) of the tibiofemoral joint

Sponsors

Riphah International University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
40 Years to 60 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Participants with age between 40 to 60 years. * Participants of both genders will be included. * Patient with unilateral/bilateral symptomatic tibiofemoral knee OA. * Patient suffering from stiffness less than 30 minutes * Patients with radiologically diagnosed case of grade 2 knee OA according to the Kellgren and Lawrence scale * Patients with reported peak knee pain of \>3 on visual analogue scale (VAS)

Exclusion criteria

* Participants with acute inflammation of knee * Participants with severe degenerative lumbar spine disease e.g spondylolisthesis * Participants with systemic inflammatory arthritic or neurological conditions * Participants with intraarticular injection in the prior 3 months * Participants with unstable heart condition * Participants with received physical therapy of knee in last 3 months

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Numeric Pain Rating Scale4 WeeksThe Numerical Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) is a commonly used self-report measure to assess the intensity of pain experienced by individuals. Participants rate their pain on a numerical scale, typically ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
WOMAC Osteoarthritis INDEX4 weeksThe western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index(WOMAC) is widely uses in the evaluation of Hip and Knee Osteoarthritis. It is a self administrated questionnaire consisting of 24 item divided into 3 sub-scales: Pain(5items) ,stiffness(2 items) and physical function (17 items)
Universal Goniometer4 weeksIt will measure range of motion of Knee

Contacts

Primary ContactSaba Rafique Dr., DPT,MS-OMPT
saba.rafique@riphah.edu.pk03034045433
Backup ContactSaba Rafique Dr., DPT, MS-OMPT
saba.rafique@riphah.edu.pk03034045433

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026