Skip to content

Comparison of Plus Lens Addition Versus Vision Therapy for Management of Accommodative Infacility

Comparison of Plus Lens Addition Versus Vision Therapy for Management of Accommodative Infacility

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06748534
Enrollment
38
Registered
2024-12-27
Start date
2024-03-01
Completion date
2025-02-28
Last updated
2024-12-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Accommodative Insufficiency

Brief summary

This Randomized Control Trials Study , conducted in Lahore, Pakistan, investigates the comparative efficacy of two approaches-plus lens addition of +0.75 diopters (D) and vision therapy using the HART chart-for managing accommodative infacility. Accommodative infacility, a condition characterized by the eye's reduced ability to adjust focus between distant and near objects, impacts both visual comfort and performance, particularly during prolonged near work.

Detailed description

The study sample comprises 38 participants, aged 15 to 35 years, divided into two groups: one group receiving plus lens addition of +0.75 D and the other undergoing structured vision therapy with the HART chart. Findings revealed that vision therapy was significantly more effective than plus lens addition, with results showing statistical significance at P \< 0.05.

Interventions

DIAGNOSTIC_TESTPlus Lens Addition (+0.75 D)

Participants in this group were provided with +0.75 D lenses, designed to assist in alleviating strain caused by accommodative infacility by reducing the demand on the eye's focusing mechanism.

COMBINATION_PRODUCTVision Therapy Using HART Chart

Intervention Details: Participants in this group underwent vision therapy sessions utilizing the HART chart, aimed at enhancing their accommodative flexibility through repetitive focusing exercises.

Sponsors

Superior University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
15 Years to 35 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Participants aged 15 to 35 years. * Diagnosed with accommodative infacility. * Capable of adhering to the full study duration of 6 weeks. * Measurable accommodative dysfunction confirmed through baseline eye examinations. * Written informed consent from participants or guardians.

Exclusion criteria

* Presence of other significant ocular or neurological conditions. * Inability or unwillingness to adhere to the prescribed treatment. * Prior treatment for accommodative infacility within the past 6 months. * Significant uncorrected refractive errors. * Medical contraindications for using plus lenses or vision therapy.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Monocular and Binocular Accommodative Facility (MAF/BAF)12 MonthsImprovement in accommodative facility measured using Monocular and Binocular Accommodative Facility (MAF/BAF) tests with ±2.00 D flipper lenses. Measurement is recorded in cycles per minute (cpm).
subjective measures of visual comfort12 MonthsReduction in symptoms of accommodative infacility assessed using a customized performa. Measurement is based on a symptom severity score recorded pre- and post-intervention.

Countries

Pakistan

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026