Skip to content

FITLIGHT Reliability and Acute Training Effects

Reliability of the FITLIGHT System and Acute Effects of Cognitive Training on Dual-task Performance in Hopping and Cutting Assessments

Status
Terminated
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06748417
Enrollment
8
Registered
2024-12-27
Start date
2025-02-18
Completion date
2025-09-05
Last updated
2025-09-12

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Athletic Injuries

Keywords

Reaction time, neurocognitive performance, Agility training

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to assess the reliability of outcomes collected using a speed and cognitive light training system. This study will also be used to understand the effects of brain training on athletic performance using the FITLIGHT System.

Interventions

DEVICEAcute Cognitive Training

Participants will receive the intervention in person once within in the study for 30 minutes. During the intervention, participants will receive a cognitive training session consisting of an upper extremity, lower extremity, and whole-body reaction time task. The device (5 LED) will be placed in front of participants in all tasks, and participants will be asked to deactivate lights that illuminate for a period of 30 seconds with 30 seconds of rest. For the upper and lower extremity tasks, these will be repeated on both limbs. The purpose of the tasks are to pre-train reaction time in an isolated fashion, requiring participants to use either hands or feet to deactivate the lights, as well as incorporate whole-body movement in the third task along with a decision-making (color-matching) component.

OTHERNon-stimulating Rest

Participants will receive the intervention in person once within the study for 30 minutes. During the intervention, participants will watch, while seated, a 30-minute segment of a nature documentary. The purpose of this intervention is to ensure no additional cognitive or movement training that would improve performance on the dual-task test occurs during the intended rest period.

Sponsors

University of Miami
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
DEVICE_FEASIBILITY
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 25 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Healthy as determined by a Physical Activity Readiness Questionnaire * BMI under 30

Exclusion criteria

* Color-blindness * Fractures within the past year * Musculoskeletal injury limiting sports activity within the past 6 months * Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries within the past 5 years * Medical conditions that do not have physician clearance to participate in exercise * History of concussion * Diagnosed cognitive impairments * Untreated attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) or attention deficit disorder (ADD) * Prisoners * Pregnant women * Smokers

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Completion TimeUp to 5 minutes before and up to 5 minutes after interventionWill be measured in seconds (s)
Change in Hop distanceUp to 10 minutes before and up to 10 minutes after interventionWill be measured in meters (m)
Change in Percentage of Correct Responses in Cognitive-Motor Running T-testUp to 5 minutes before and up to 5 minutes after interventionPercentage of correct responses on cognitive-motor test
Change in Reaction TimeUp to 5 minutes before and up to 5 minutes after interventionWill be measured in seconds (s)

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026