Skip to content

Safety and Efficacy of Traction Robot-assisted Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Early Gastric Cancer

Safety and Efficacy of Traction Robot-assisted Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Early Gastric Cancer: a Pilot Randomized Controlled Study

Status
Recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06748352
Enrollment
50
Registered
2024-12-27
Start date
2024-12-30
Completion date
2025-03-01
Last updated
2024-12-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Early Gastric Cancer, Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection, Robot Surgery

Brief summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to investigate whether the flexible auxiliary single-arm transluminal endoscopic robot (FASTER) system can improve the safety of the endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). It will also evaluate the efficacy of the system, such as whether it could reduce the procedure time and so on. The main questions it aims to answer are: Does the use of the FASTER system reduce the number of muscular injuries, improving the safety of the ESD procedure? Does the use of the FASTER system reduce the procedure and dissection time, improving the efficacy of the ESD procedure? Researchers will compare FASTER-assisted ESD and conventional ESD to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the FASTER system. Participants will: Be randomly assigned to the group with ESD using the traditional procedure or to the group with ESD assisted by the FASTER system. Keep a diary of their symptoms after the procedure. ESD has gained widespread acceptance as the standard method for treating early-stage gastrointestinal cancers. Adequate exposure of the submucosa layer through effective tissue traction is vital for the safe and effective performance of ESD. The FASTER system is designed to overcome this technical difficulty.

Interventions

The patients who are randomly assigned to the FASTER-assisted ESD group will undergo the ESD procedure with the assistance of the FASTER system.

The patients who are randomly assigned to the conventional ESD group will undergo the ESD following the clinically established pattern.

Sponsors

Shandong University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients aged 18-80. * Patients with pathologically verified high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia (HGIN) or intramucosal carcinoma of the stomach.

Exclusion criteria

* Patients have lesions with confirmed or potential deep submucosal invasion or lymph node metastasis. * Patients with severe underlying diseases precluding endotracheal intubation, general anesthesia, or surgery. * Patients have a history of gastric malignancy with previous radiotherapy or operative treatment leading to changes in gastric structure. * Patients have lesions with local recurrence after endoscopic resection. * Patients unable to obtain informed consent.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
the number of muscular injuriesWithin 24 hours after the procedure.Muscular injury is described as visible damage to the muscularis propria.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
the incidence of muscular injuryWithin 24 hours after the procedure.Muscular injury is described as visible damage to the muscularis propria.
the frequency of intraoperative hemorrhageWithin 24 hours after the procedure.
the proportion of intraoperative hemorrhage ≥ grade 2Within 24 hours after the procedure.Intraoperative hemorrhage is divided into four grades: Grade 0 means no significant bleeding is observed during the procedure. Grade 1 means minimal bleeding, which could stop spontaneously or be easily controlled by cauterization with a dual knife. Grade 2 refers to minor hemorrhage that requires multiple cauterizations with a dual knife or hemostatic forceps. Grade 3 indicates massive hemorrhage that requires multiple cauterizations with hemostatic forceps.
hemostasis timeWithin 24 hours after the procedure.Hemostasis time referred to the time from the detection of submucosal bleeding until hemostasis was completed.
the frequency of supplemental injectionsWithin 24 hours after the procedure.Supplemental injection refers to injections performed after the beginning of the dissection.
en bloc resection rateWithin 24 hours after the procedure.En bloc dissection refers to the complete removal of the entire lesion in a single piece.
procedure timeWithin 24 hours after the procedure.Procedure time is the time from the beginning of injection to the completion of dissection.
dissection timeWithin 24 hours after the procedure.Dissection time is the time from the beginning of dissection to the completion of dissection.
direct-vision dissection rateWithin 24 hours after the procedure.Direct-vision dissection time is the time that the endoscopist can directly observe the tip of the dual knife and the submucosal layer at the same time. By dividing the direct-vision dissection time by the total dissection duration, the direct-vision dissection rate is calculated.
R0 resection rateWithin 24 hours after the procedure.R0 resection is defined as en bloc resection with negative vertical and horizontal margins.
the supplemental injections timeWithin 24 hours after the procedure.The time of supplementary injection is from the insertion of the injection needle into the submucosal layer until the injection is completed and the needle is withdrawn.

Countries

China

Contacts

Primary ContactXiuli Zuo Professor, MD, PhD
zuoxiuli@sdu.edu.cn86+18560080066

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026