Skip to content

Functional Power Training on Mobility and Gait Parameters in Cerebral Palsy

Effects of Functional Power Training on Mobility and Gait Parameters in Children With Cerebral Palsy.

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06748183
Acronym
FPTCP
Enrollment
26
Registered
2024-12-27
Start date
2024-09-26
Completion date
2025-01-15
Last updated
2025-01-23

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cerebral Palsy

Keywords

Cerebral Palsy, Gait Parameters, Mobility, Functional Power Training

Brief summary

Cerebral Palsy is a lifelong neuromuscular disorder impacting movement, posture, and muscle control, ranging from mild hand weakness to severe paralysis. Risk factors are grouped into specific stages: preconception (linked to the mother's health), prenatal (during pregnancy), perinatal (at birth), and the neonatal and infant stages. Functional power training is employed to improve the functional abilities of children with Cerebral Palsy by involving them in various power-based exercises to strengthen muscles, increase power, and build endurance. This study aims to evaluate the impact of functional power training on gait and mobility in children with Cerebral Palsy.

Detailed description

Cerebral Palsy (CP) is a chronic neuromuscular disorder that affects movement, posture, and muscle control, with symptoms ranging from mild weakness to severe paralysis. The risk factors for CP are classified into preconception, prenatal, perinatal, and neonatal categories. Functional power training (FPT) is a therapeutic approach aimed at improving muscle strength, power, and endurance in children with CP. This study seeks to evaluate the impact of FPT on gait parameters and mobility in children with CP. This randomized controlled trial will include 26 children, aged 6 to 12 years, with Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS) I or II. Participants will be randomly assigned to either the experimental group (FPT plus routine physical therapy) or the control group (routine physical therapy alone). Exclusion criteria include recent botulinum toxin A treatment, serial casting within the last 6 months, or selective dorsal rhizotomy. Gait parameters (step length, stride length, cadence, gait speed, and step width) and mobility outcomes (6MWT and Timed Up and Go test) will be assessed before and after the intervention. Data will be analyzed using SPSS version 23.

Interventions

OTHERRoutine physical therapy

Routine physical therapy for a child with Cerebral Palsy involves hot pack for muscle relaxation and isometric exercises to enhance motor skills, muscle strength, and coordination. Passive stretching will be given as a treatment plan. Therapists employ sit to stand exercise to improve gait, posture, and overall functional abilities. Regular progress evaluations are conducted to adjust interventions, ensuring ongoing improvements.

Group A will participate in Functional Power Training (FPT) alongside routine physical therapy The exercise protocol aims to enhance strength, mobility, and endurance through resistance training across various functional activities. It includes exercises such as running, walking, chair pushing, stair climbing, propelling a stable scooter, and sideways walking, all performed at 50-70% of the participant's maximum speed. Resistance is added using methods like dragging a loaded box with a belt during running and walking, pushing a chair with a loaded box underneath, wearing a loaded vest while climbing stairs, and attaching a loaded box to a scooter for propulsion exercises. Each exercise involves 6 to 8 repetitions lasting 25 seconds, followed by 30 to 50 seconds of rest. This structured regimen focuses on controlled movement and endurance, providing a comprehensive approach to improving physical performance.

Sponsors

Riphah International University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Masking description

Participants will get separate treatment protocols and possible efforts will be put to mask the both group about the treatment

Intervention model description

It will be a randomized control trial employing nonprobability convenient sampling. Two groups, comprising participants aged 6 to 12, will be formed and randomly divided. Group A will undergo Functional Power Training (FPT) alongside Routine Physical Therapy (RPT), while Group B will receive only Routine Physical Therapy (RPT). This intervention aims to compare the effects of combined functional training and routine therapy against routine therapy alone, focusing on improvements in gait parameters and mobility among children with Cerebral Palsy.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
6 Years to 12 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age 6 to 12 * Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS) I and II * Either gender will be included

Exclusion criteria

* Treatment with botulinum toxin A in lower limb * Serial Casting of lower limb less than 6 months before the start of the functional power training * Selective dorsal rhizotomy treatment * Children who did not (yet) choose walking as their preferred way of mobility

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Stride length5 monthsTo measure stride length(meters) first identify the starting point on the walking path and instruct the participant to take several steps. Then, measure the distance between two consecutive heel strikes of the same foot, repeat for multiple strides, and calculate the average to determine the participant's typical stride length.
Gate speed5 monthsTo measure gait speed(meters/sec), mark the starting and finishing points on a straight path, and instruct the participant to walk at a comfortable pace while measuring the time taken to cover the distance. Repeat the process for accuracy, then calculate gait speed by dividing the distance by the time taken to complete it.
Step width5 monthsTo measure step width(centimeter), define a walking path and instruct the participant to walk naturally while measuring the lateral distance between the midpoints of successive footsteps. Repeat this measurement for multiple steps and calculate the average step width to analyze the participant's walking pattern.
Step length5 monthsTo measure step length(centimeters), first mark a starting point on the floor, then have the participant walk naturally while measuring the distance between consecutive heel strikes. Repeat this process for several steps and calculate the average of those measurements to determine the participant's typical step length.
Cadence5 monthsTo measure cadence(steps/min), choose a specific time interval and instruct the participant to walk within that period while counting the number of steps taken. Repeat the process for accuracy and calculate the average steps per minute to determine the participant's cadence.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Timed up and go (TUG) test5 monthsStart with the individual seated in a chair, and upon the signal, have them stand, walk three meters, turn, walk back, and sit down. Measure the total time taken for this sequence to assess functional mobility, with longer times suggesting potential mobility challenges.
6-Minute Walk Test5 monthsSet up a marked straight pathway and instruct the individual to walk as far as possible within a 6-minute timeframe, encouraging them to maintain a consistent pace while providing periodic time updates. At the end of the session, measure the total distance covered in meters to assess their functional capacity

Countries

Pakistan

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026