Skip to content

Pull-out Tenolysis Versus Simple A1 Pulley Release in Trigger Digits

A1 Pulley Release and Pull-out Tenolysis Versus Simple A1 Pulley Release in Trigger Fingers and Thumb. a Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06747962
Enrollment
40
Registered
2024-12-24
Start date
2025-01-31
Completion date
2027-01-31
Last updated
2025-01-14

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Trigger Digit

Keywords

trigger finger, trigger thumb, traction tenolysis, pull-out tenolysis, A1 pulley

Brief summary

Trigger finger is a common tendinopathy and clinically presents with painful catching or popping as the patient flexes and extends the digit, due to mechanical impingement of the thickened flexor tendons as they pass through a narrow tendon sheath canal at the level of the metacarpal head. If conservative management with corticosteroid injection and splinting fails or if symptoms recur, surgery and division of the A1 pulley are indicated. Traction (or pull- out) tenolysis is a maneuver based on pulling of the flexor tendons out of the wound, to release any adhesions that might have occurred due to long- standing triggering. Although it has been associated with postoperative pain and stiffness, no robust evidence exists to support its benefit or not. In view of the low quality evidence regarding the pros and cons of traction (or pull-out) tenolysis following A1 pulley release, the investigators will compare simple A1 pulley release versus A1 pulley release and pull-out tenolysis in a prospective randomized study design. Hypothesis of the study is that the pull- out tenolysis yields better results in terms of total active range of movement, pinch and grip strength, pain and quick-DASH scoring when compared to simple pulley release. The confirmation of the hypothesis will justify the use of pull-out tenolysis as a means of breaking any tendon adhesions and returning to normal function sooner. On the contrary, if the pull-out tenolysis is linked to a less favorable functional outcome, simple A1 pulley release will be recommended.

Detailed description

Trigger finger is a common condition that can cause hand pain and disability. It involves entrapment of the flexor tendons of the fingers and thumb within their flexor tendon sheath at the level of the metacarpal head. This phenomenon is due to the mechanical impingement of the thickened flexor tendons as they pass through a narrow tendon sheath canal. It can cause painful catching or popping as the patient flexes and extends the digit. On occasion, the digit will lock in flexion and require passive manipulation to extend. Initial management can be conservative with corticosteroid injection and splinting. If conservative management fails or if symptoms recur, surgical release of the A1 pulley is indicated. This is a common procedure which is performed under local anaesthesia. Intraoperatively, following division of A1 pulley, a traction tenolysis is occasionally performed by some surgeons. This maneuver, which is based on pulling of the flexor tendons out of the wound, is believed to release any adhesions that might have occurred due to long- standing triggering but it has been reported to result in prolonged postoperative pain and stiffness. However, there is no robust evidence to support a less favorable outcome following traction tenolysis. Aim of the study: In view of the low quality evidence regarding the pros and cons of traction (or pull-out) tenolysis following A1 pulley release, the investigators will compare simple A1 pulley release versus A1 pulley release and pull-out tenolysis in a prospective randomized study design. Hypothesis of the study is that the pull-out tenolysis yields better results in terms of total active range of movement, pinch and grip strength, pain and quick-DASH scoring when compared to simple pulley release. The confirmation of the hypothesis will justify the use of pull-out tenolysis as a means of breaking any tendon adhesions and returning to normal function sooner. On the contrary, if the pull- out tenolysis is linked to a less favorable functional outcome, simple A1 pulley release will be recommended. The study will be conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and the Guidelines on Good Clinical Practice.

Interventions

PROCEDUREA1 pulley release and pull out tenolysis

A short transverse incision will be made over the proximal or distal palmar crease, according to the digit involved. Blunt dissection will be used to spread the subcutaneous tissue and the palmar fascia to expose the A1 pulley. The digital nerves and vessels will be retracted and protected. The proximal edge of the A1 pulley will be identified and a scalpel blade will be used to divide the entire A1 pulley under direct vision. Flexor digitorum superficialis and flexor digitorum profundus tendons or flexor pollicis longus tendon (for the thumb) will be gently pulled out of the wound with two mosquito forceps to break any adhesions. The wound will be closed primarily with sutures. The patient will be asked to actively move the digit to confirm complete relief of triggering.The wound will be closed primarily with sutures.

PROCEDURESimple A1 pulley release

A short transverse incision will be made over the proximal or distal palmar crease, according to the digit involved. Blunt dissection will be used to spread the subcutaneous tissue and the palmar fascia to expose the A1 pulley. The digital nerves and vessels will be retracted and protected. The proximal edge of the A1 pulley will be identified and a scalpel blade will be used to divide the entire A1 pulley vision. After release, the patient will be asked to actively move the digit to confirm complete relief of triggering.The wound will be closed primarily with sutures.

Sponsors

Eleni Karagergou
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 100 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients with single trigger finger that failed conservative treatment * Patients with single trigger finger that had recurrence of symptoms after conservative treatment

Exclusion criteria

* Patients with limited range of movement before appearance of triggering * Patients with osteoarthritis / rheumatoid arthritis * Patients that had a second procedure at the same time of trigger finger release (eg carpal tunnel release).

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Total active range of motion (AROM) of the affected finger2 weeksComparison of total (AROM) between the groups. Measurements will be done with a goniometer
Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for pain relief2 weeksComparison of the VAS for pain between the groups. Minimum 0, Maximum 10, higher scores mean a worse outcome

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (QuickDASH) functional score6 weeksComparison of the QuickDASH score between the two groups. Minimum 0, Maximum 100, higher scores mean a worse outcome.
Grip and Pinch strength6 weeksComparison of grip and pinch strength between the groups, as measured by a dynamometer

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Rate of complicationsUp to 3 months postoperativelyAll complications, such as swelling, wound dehiscence and infection, will be documented and rates will be compared between the groups

Countries

Greece

Contacts

Primary ContactEleni Karagergou, MD, PhD
krgeleni@gmail.com+306972386716
Backup ContactDimitrios Kitridis, MD
dkitridis@gmail.com

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026