Skip to content

Injury Prevention Programs in Overhead Athletes

Effect of Integrated Workouts on Injury Prevention in Overhead Athletes

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06747702
Acronym
IPOverhead
Enrollment
80
Registered
2024-12-24
Start date
2024-09-02
Completion date
2024-12-04
Last updated
2024-12-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Healthy, Shoulder Flexibility, Shoulder Impingement Syndrome, Shoulder Injury, Shoulder Joint Limitation, Shoulder Pain Chronic

Keywords

Injury prevention, Glenohumeral rotation deficits, Overhead athletes, shoulder pain, Shoulder instability, Shoulder mobility, Shoulder exercises, Shoulder symetries, Shoulder Asymetries, Shoulder stability, Shoulder strength, Escapulahumeral complex

Brief summary

To evaluate and describe the effect of performing an integrated injury prevention exercises on the variables considered as injury risk factors in overhead athletes

Detailed description

To evaluate and describe the effect of performing fast or 6-8 weeks injury prevention programs on the variables considered as injury risk factors in overhead athletes as glenohumeral rotational range of motion or muscle activation pattern and asymmetries.

Interventions

OTHERInjury prevention workout

The injury prevention workout consisted on engaging on a prevention program from 1 day to 8 weeks where the participants will develop functional sport exercises to prevent shoulder injuries or pain in overhead sports.

Sponsors

University Ramon Llull
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

Participants will be unaware of whether they belong to the experimental or control group. They will receive instructions on their workout regimen without information on the study's hypothesis regarding functional prevention training. Individuals conducting pre- and post-intervention assessments (e.g., EMG analysis, ROM measurements, proprioception tests) will not be informed of the participant group allocation. This prevents bias in data collection and interpretation. Data will be anonymized before analysis, and analysts will not have access to group identifiers during the statistical evaluation phase.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Signing the informed consent according last version ogf Helsinky Declaration. * Be involved in a overhead sport for a minimum of 2 years.

Exclusion criteria

* Have some pain or disconfort to develop the outcome measurements

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Shoulder ROMFrom enrollment to the end of the intervention at 8 weeks. Follow-up at 12-weeksShoulder rotational range of movement will be measured made by a single experienced examiner with the IMU Output Capture (Output V2 Unit, Ireland). The IMU will be calibrated prior to ROM testing according to the device instructions. The IMU will be securely attached to the participant's forearm with a self-adhering strap, 10 cm distal to the lateral epicondyle. Measurements will be sent wirelessly to a tablet and subsequently transferred to the Output Hub specific software to calculate ROM
Muscle RMSFrom enrollment to the end of the intervention at 8 weeks. Follow-up at 12-weeksEscapular complex muscular activation EMG recording will be measured with the mDurance® device (mDurance® Solutions SL, Granada, Spain). The mDurance® system consisted of an EMG Shimmer3 unit (Realtime TechnologiesLtD, Dublin, Ireland). Muscles-activity data were obtained using a validated surface electromyography (EMG) system. This novel system includes a us-er-friendly software, and a light hardware, which make it more affordable and accessible for clinicians and sport trainers. The mDurance® system consisted of an EMG Shimmer3 unit (Realtime TechnologiesLtD, Dublin, Ireland). The unit has a bipolar surface elec-tromyography bipolar sensor for the acquisition of muscle activity. Each Shimmer3 has two channels, with a sampling rate of 1024 Hz applying a bandwidth of 8.4 Hz, and a 24-bit signal with an overall amplification of 100 to10,000 v/v \[41\]. This device is valid and reliable for recording muscle activity during a functional task (ICC = 0.916; 95% CI = 0.831-0.958)
Muscles AsymetriesFrom enrollment to the end of the intervention at 8 weeks. Follow-up at 12-weeksDiferences in % the muscle activation of the interescapular muscle complex by EMG. These recording will be also performed with the mDurance® device (mDurance® Solutions SL, Granada, Spain). The mDurance® system consisted of an EMG Shimmer3 unit (Realtime TechnologiesLtD, Dublin, Ireland) . This device is valid and reliable for recording muscle activity during a functional task (ICC = 0.916
Shoulder proprioceptionFrom enrollment to the end of the intervention at 8 weeks. Follow-up at 12-weeksThe Ability of recognizing a specific glenohumeral rotational range of movement degrees we will use the IMU Output Capture (Output V2 Unit, Ireland). The IMU was calibrated prior to ROM testing according to the device instructions. The IMU was securely attached to the participant's forearm with a self-adhering strap, 10 cm distal to the lateral epicondyle. Measurements were sent wirelessly to a tablet and subsequently transferred to the Output Hub specific software to calculate ROM

Countries

Spain

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026