Skip to content

Evaluating Patient and Caregiver Satisfaction with the Informed Consent Process in Surgery

Evaluating Patient and Caregiver Satisfaction on the Informed Consent Process in Surgical Practice in a Tertiary Care Centre: a Cross-Sectional Study

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06746207
Enrollment
384
Registered
2024-12-24
Start date
2023-10-01
Completion date
2024-12-09
Last updated
2024-12-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Informed Consent, Patient and Caregiver Satisfaction

Brief summary

The goal of this observational study is to evaluate patient and caregiver satisfaction with the informed consent process in surgical practice at a tertiary care center in Nepal. The main questions it aims to answer are: How satisfied are patients and caregivers with the current informed consent process in surgery? How well do patients and caregivers understand the informed consent information provided? Are there differences in satisfaction and understanding based on factors such as education level or family involvement? Researchers will compare the perceptions of patients and caregivers to understand if there are gaps in communication and satisfaction. Participants will: Complete a structured questionnaire assessing their understanding and satisfaction with the informed consent process. Share their views on the type and quality of information provided during the consent process. Rate their satisfaction on a 10-point scale based on their experience with the informed consent procedure.

Interventions

OTHERInformed Consent Process Evaluation

This study does not involve a clinical intervention. Instead, it focuses on evaluating the existing process of informed consent in a surgical setting. Patients and caregivers will be surveyed to assess their understanding, satisfaction, and perceptions of the informed consent process. The study examines factors such as clarity of information provided, patient and caregiver involvement, and overall satisfaction with the process, without altering the current practices. The goal is to identify areas for improvement in communication and documentation, ensuring that patient rights and autonomy are respected.

Sponsors

Maharajgunj Medical Campus
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
CROSS_SECTIONAL

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients aged 18 years or older undergoing major elective surgical procedures requiring regional or general anesthesia. * Caregivers of eligible patients who provide informed consent on behalf of the patient. * Willingness to participate and provide consent for the study.

Exclusion criteria

* Patients undergoing emergency surgeries. * Patients who are unable to participate due to language barriers or cognitive impairment. * Patients or caregivers who refuse to participate in the study.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Patient and Caregiver Satisfaction with the Informed Consent ProcessWithin 24 hours of the surgerySatisfaction with the informed consent process will be evaluated using a structured questionnaire. Patients and caregivers will rate satisfaction on a 10-point Likert scale (1 = least satisfied, 10 = most satisfied) and respond to Yes/No questions assessing their understanding of the surgery's nature, risks, long-term effects, and anesthesia-related complications. Additional questions evaluate the clarity and completeness of the consent form, including whether essential components (e.g., patient name, diagnosis, procedure details, and risks) were documented. Responses aim to identify gaps in the consent process and assess whether it meets patient and caregiver expectations, as well as legal and ethical standards.

Countries

Nepal

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026