Skip to content

The Assessment of the Feasibility and Operational Performance of Automated System Bronchoscopy in a Simulated Environment

The Assessment of the Feasibility and Operational Performance of Automated System Bronchoscopy in a Simulated Environment: a Multicenter, Randomized-Controlled Trial.

Status
Enrolling by invitation
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06741267
Enrollment
30
Registered
2024-12-18
Start date
2024-01-01
Completion date
2024-12-31
Last updated
2024-12-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Compare Operational Performance of Three Technology in Lung Models

Brief summary

Recruit 30 trainee physicians from 6 centers and compare their performance in operating lung models using automatic bronchoscopy, robotic bronchoscopy, and electromagnetic navigation bronchoscopy.

Interventions

DEVICERBS

physicians control RBS

DEVICEAB

physician control automatic bronchoscopy

DEVICEENB

physicians control electromagnetic bronchoscopy

Sponsors

Guangzhou Medical University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
DEVICE_FEASIBILITY
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. The recruited participants were respiratory internal medicine trainees undergoing further training. 2. They were willing to undertake relevant training and complete the experiment persistently -

Exclusion criteria

If the participant has any previous clinical or simulated experiences involving electromagnetic navigation bronchoscopy, robotic bronchoscopy system, or fluoroscopy bronchoscopy, they will be excluded. \-

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Sampling timeDuring the bronchoscopySampling time , the time used to sample

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Total timeDuring the bronchoscopytotal procedure time

Countries

Chad

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026