Skip to content

Long-term Efficacy of Once Daily Versus Twice Daily Aspirin in High-risk MPN Patients with Aspirin Resistance

Long-term Efficacy of Once Daily Versus Twice Daily Aspirin in High-risk Myeloproliferative Neoplasms Patients with Aspirin Resistance

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06740916
Enrollment
240
Registered
2024-12-18
Start date
2024-12-12
Completion date
2030-12-31
Last updated
2024-12-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Myeloproliferative Neoplasms (MPN)

Keywords

myeloproliferative neoplasm, aspirin resistance

Brief summary

Patients with myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN) could have laboratory aspirin resistance and then increasing dose of aspirin from once daily to twice daily regimen is suggested. However, it is not routinely recommended to perform platelet function testing to determine aspirin resistance in MPN patients. Moreover, it is not known whether increasing dose of aspirin would always correct aspirin resistance and significantly prevent the thrombotic events in MPN patients. Therefore, this study aims to compare the efficacy of once daily versus twice daily aspirin in high-risk MPN patients with aspirin resistance. MPN patients with laboratory aspirin resistance will be included in this prospective randomized study and platelet function testing will be repeated at one and six months later. Clinical thrombosis and side effect from aspirin will be recorded for at least 2 years after intervention.

Detailed description

Inclusion criteria included adult (\>=18 years) Philadelphia-negative MPN patients taking aspirin (81 mg/day). Exclusion criteria included concomitant active cancer, thrombocytopenia (platelet less than 50,000/uL), taking anticoagulant, platelet function test (LTA method) showing no aspirin resistance, active gastric disease, active bleeding. Termination criteria included not taking aspirin regularly, serious side effect from aspirin. Block of four randomization is used. LTA testing is repeated at month 1 and 6 in both arms. PFA200 method is also done at initial enrollment for comparison with LTA method. Follow-up outcome data of clinical thrombosis, bleeding complication and adverse events related with aspirin are collected. Comparative analysis of outcome data is performed between two arms.

Interventions

DRUG81-mg aspirin once daily

81-mg aspirin once daily

DRUG81-mg aspirin twice daily

81-mg aspirin twice daily

Sponsors

Siriraj Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Philadelphia negative Myeloproliferative neoplasms aged at least 18 years old

Exclusion criteria

* Concomitant other active malignancy or cured less than 6 months * Platelet count less than 50,000/microL * Receiving anticoagulant * Active peptic ulcer * Active bleeding or Planning to undergo procedure/operation with bleeding risk * No laboratory aspirin resistance with LTA method

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
prevalence of aspirin resistanceAt 1 month and 6 month after interventionLaboratory aspirin resistance is determined by light transmission aggregometry using arachidonic acid (0.5 g/L) as agonist and result of aggregation \>= 20% is defined as resistance.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The incidence of thrombotic events2 yearsThe thrombotic events will be recorded for at least 2 years after intervention.

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
The cut-of-point of PFA200 to define aspirin resistanceAt enrollmentThe standard definition of aspirin resistance in this study is determined by light transmission aggregometry (LTA) using arachidonic acid (0.5 g/L) as agonist and the result of aggregation of \>=20% is defined as aspirin resistance. PFA200 is used in parallel with LTA method to determine the concordance of these two methods and to determine the appropriate cut-of-point of PFA200 method to define aspirin resistance.

Countries

Thailand

Contacts

Primary ContactYingyong Chinthammitr, MD, RCPT, Thai board of hemato
dryingyong@gmail.com+66 + 0814264252

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026