Skip to content

Retrospective Study on the WalkOn AFO in Children or Teenagers With Neurological Pathologies

Interest of Prefabricated Carbon Orthoses in the Therapeutic Arsenal of Children and Adolescents Affected by Central or Peripheral Neurological Pathologies: Retrospective Study on Gait Parameters and Prescription Criteria

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06740006
Enrollment
65
Registered
2024-12-18
Start date
2024-09-03
Completion date
2025-02-28
Last updated
2025-09-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cerebral Palsy (CP), Neuropathy (Disorder), Spastic Paraplegia, Spina Bifida, Spinal Cord Injuries (SCI)

Brief summary

The goal of this observational study is to assess the interest of prefabricated carbon fiber ankle foot orthoses (AFO) in children and teenagers with central or peripheral neurological pathologies. The main question it aims to answer is: Does prefabricated carbon AFO improve gait and provide user satisfaction? In current practice, all patients with gait impairments were fitted with this orthosis and had a 3D gait analysis with and without AFO. Biomecanical and follow-up data collected in current practice are analysed in this study in order to answer the question.

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

Otto Bock France SNC
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Observational model
OTHER
Time perspective
RETROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
4 Years to 17 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patient, child or adolescent, whose gait is affected by central or peripheral motor impairments * Patient who has carried out a one-off trial of a WalkOn AFO (Ankle-Foot Orthosis) within the last 3 years prior to the beginning of the study (inclusion period) * Patient whose quantified gait analysis with the WalkOn AFO and without orthosis is available in the medical file and whose date is within the inclusion period * The investigator has verified that the patient and the parental authorities have received the information note concerning the study * The investigator has verified that the person and the parental authorities do not object to the processing of data necessary for the study

Exclusion criteria

• Patients or holders of parental authority objecting to the processing of data within the framework of the study

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Stride lengthAfter 1 hour with the deviceBiomechanical parameter: the distance between successive points of initial contact of the same foot (m)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Walking cadenceAfter 1 hour with the deviceBiomechanical parameter: the walking rate is equal to the walking speed divided by the stride lenth (steps/min).
Gait Profile ScoreAfter 1 hour with the deviceBiomechanical parameter: the Gait Profile Score (GPS) is a clinical index that can be used to measure the overall deviation of gait data relative to normative data (°).
Gait Variable Score for the HipAfter 1 hour with the deviceBiomechanical parameter: the Gait Variable Score describes the joint specific measures of gait variability for the Hip (°).
Gait Variable Score for the KneeAfter 1 hour with the deviceBiomechanicl parameter: the Gait Variable Score describes the joint specific measures of gait variability for the Knee (°).
Gait Variable Score for the AnkleAfter 1 hour with the deviceBiomechanical parameter: the Gait Variable Score describes the joint specific measures of gait variability for the Ankle (°).
Walking speedAfter 1 hour with the deviceBiomechanical parameter: the walking speed is the time one takes to walk a specified distance on level surfaces over a short distance (m/s).
Antero-posterior Ground Force ReactionAfer 1 hour with the deviceBiomechanical parameter: the antero-posterior Ground Force Reaction is the antero-posterior force exerted by the ground on a body in contact with it (N).
Time of StanceAfter 1 hour with the deviceBiomechanical parameter: the time of stance is the time one spend with the foot on the floor (s)
Stance percentageAfter 1 hour with the deviceBiomechanical parameter: the stance percentage is the percentage of time one spend with the foot on the floor during the gait cycle (%)
Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with Assistive Technology (QUEST)Between 3 to 18 months after the fitting with the device / Long-term follow-up visitQuestionnaire: the QUEST measures the user satisfaction. It contains an evaluation part regarding the technology of the device on 8 items and one regarding services around the device on 4 items. It allows the patient to express himself on the criteria that are most important to him. An average satisfaction value can be calculated on a scale going from 1 to 5, with 1= Not at all satisfied, 2=Not very satisfied, 3=more or less satisfied, 4=Quite satisfied or 5=Very satisfied. The final QUEST score is the average obtained over all 12 items. Technology and services sub-scores can also be calculated. In this study, the french version ESAT (Evaluation des la Satisfaction envers une Aide Technique) is used. This questionnaire only concerns patients who purchase the orthosis, and was administered during a follow-up visit of the patient in the rehabilitation center.
Walk ratioAfter 1 hour with the deviceBiomechanical parameter: the walk ration represents the relationship between the amplitude and frequency of rhythmic leg movement during walking (m/step/min).

Countries

France

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026