Communication Model, HIV, Implementation Science, Self Sampling
Conditions
Brief summary
The purpose of the study is to conduct an intervention program aimed at increasing HPV self-sampling among women living with HIV in Ghana.
Detailed description
Women living with HIV, (WLWH), in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) have a six-fold increased risk of developing cervical cancer (CC) compared to their uninfected counterparts. Our studies in Ghana show that self-sampling is acceptable, easy to use, and efficacious in detecting precancer lesions among WLWH. However, this screening mechanism has not been translated to healthcare practice in Ghana. Systematic adaptation and implementation toolkits are needed to translate self-sampling into healthcare practices. We develop a Home-based self-collected sampling for the cervical cancer Prevention Education (HOPE) toolkits to promote cervical cancer screening in Ghana. HOPE toolkit core components such as (a) self-sample HPV testing kits and (b) the 3R (Reframe, Reprioritize, and Reform) communication model will not change as they are evidence-based. The content and the intervention delivery modalities of HOPE will go through the cultural adaptation iterative processes. This R21 resubmission seeks to develop contextually appropriate adaptation and implementation toolkits in Ghana. A three-step approach will be used for the adaption process and evaluation of the toolkit. First, we will organize focus group discussions (FGDs) to identify contextual factors affecting the toolkit adaptation and nominal group techniques (NGTs) to determine the different compositions of the toolkits and select the final toolkit. A sample of 35 stakeholder advisory board members representing three organizational levels: potential intervention participants (i.e., WLWH), community leaders, and healthcare workers (e.g., doctors, nurses, administrators) will participate in the focus group FGDs and NGTs. Second, we will recruit 45 participants including WLWH and healthcare workers to evaluate the feasibility, acceptability, appropriateness, and adoptability of the selected toolkit. Third, we will test the preliminary efficacy of HOPE on cervical cancer screening defined as cervical cancer screening uptake among WLWH in the intervention arm (n=54) and control arm (n = 54). Participants will be recruited from the Cape Coast Teaching Hospital (CCTH). Specific aims of HOPE are: Aim I: Develop and adapt the HOPE toolkit: Hypothesis: Stakeholders will identify and prioritize community needs and translate findings into a culturally adapted toolkit. Aim II: Evaluate the characteristics of the HOPE toolkit: Hypothesis: We hypothesize that 80% of participants will find HOPE toolkits feasible, acceptable, appropriate, and adoptable. Aim III: Assess the efficacy of HOPE on CCS. Hypothesis: We hypothesize that CCS behavior will increase significantly among women in the intervention group compared to those in the control group. Aim IV: Identify actionable factors and implementation costs that influence the adoption of the toolkit. Hypothesis: The Actionable factors and implementation costs will significantly influence the toolkit adoption.
Interventions
BEHAVIORALHPV Self-Sampling and Behavior Intervention
Participants in the intervention group will receive HPV self sampling and behavioral intervention
BEHAVIORALParticipants in the intervention group will receive HPV self sampling and behavioral intervention
Received enhance standard care
Sponsors
Baylor University
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
25 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
* General eligibility criteria for these stakeholders include (1) the ability to give consent per Institutional Review Board stipulations, (2) residing in the central region of Ghana, (3) having no medical, psychological, or social characteristics that would interfere with the ability to fully participate, and (4) the willingness to participate in this study. 1. Specific eligibility for Intervention participants (WLWH). Study inclusion/
Exclusion criteria
for potential participants will be assessed using E-tracker data and include women (identified female at birth) who (1) are living with HIV between 25 and 65 years old5 and (2) have never had a cervical cancer screening like pap test or HPV test before, or have not had pap test or HPV testing for the past 5 years
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Cervical cancer screening uptake | 6 weeks | The outcome is screening uptake (i.e., the completion and return of a self-sample kit and pap test completion). Measure: The screening completion outcome will be binary (yes/no), and it will be assessed via the patient clinical records by the doctors at 6 weeks post-intervention. The screening completion outcome will be binary (yes/no) |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Screening Test Results | 6 weeks | Screening test results (positive, negative, or inadequate). Measure: The screening test results (positive, negative, or inadequate), will be treated as categorical outcome and it will be assessed via the patient clinical records by the doctors at 6 weeks post-intervention. |
| Treatment follow-up | 6 weeks | Whether patients with positive results follow up for treatment or not. Measures: The outcomes will be assessed via the patient clinical records by the doctors at 6 weeks post-intervention. The treatment follow-up (yes, no, or lost-to-follow-up) will be treated as categorical outcomes |
Countries
Ghana
Contacts
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORMatthew Asare, PhD
Baylor University
Outcome results
None listed