Skip to content

Association Between the SPHERTEST in Vitro Test and Response to Checkpoint Inhibitor Treatments in Patients With Advanced or Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma

Evaluation de l'Association Entre Les résultats d'un Test in Vitro en Cours de développement (SPHERTEST) et la réponse Aux Traitements Par Inhibiteur du Point de contrôle Chez Des Patients Atteints de Carcinome urothélial de Stade avancé ou métastatique.

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06738797
Acronym
PROMES-URO
Enrollment
32
Registered
2024-12-18
Start date
2024-12-12
Completion date
2029-06-01
Last updated
2026-01-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Urogenital Neoplasms

Brief summary

First-line systemic treatments for bladder cancer are based on a combination of cytotoxic and immunotherapy, sequentially or concomitantly. Immune checkpoint inhibition (ICPI) is a powerful treatment for patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma (UC). Since 2017, pembrolizumab (anti-PD1) can be offered as a second-line treatment after failure of platinum agents. In patients responding to platinum salts in first-line treatment, it is possible to maintain efficacy with maintenance treatment with another ICPI, avelumab (anti-PDL1). The phase III JAVELIN BLADDER 100 study compared avelumab to supportive care alone after successful platinum-based chemotherapy. At 30 months, 19.3% of patients were still in response compared to only 6.3% in the supportive care arm. However, biomarker analysis on tumor tissue did not show a robust signature on an individual scale. Recently, two phase 3 trials in first-line were presented at the ESMO 2023 congress. The first, in patients who could receive cisplatin-based chemotherapy, found a benefit on overall survival of adding Nivolumab in combination and then maintaining it for two years. The second proposed combined Enfortumab Vedotin and Pembrolizumab versus standard chemotherapy, with an overall survival for the study arm of more than 31 months. These trials confirm the essential role of immunotherapy in urothelial carcinomas. This progress is tempered by toxicity, cost and the lack of data on patient selection and treatment sequence. Although "prognostic" biomarkers have been identified, they cannot guide the choice of therapy, but only predict the expected outcomes, regardless of the treatment; biomarkers capable of predicting clinical benefit ("predictive") are urgently needed. It is therefore essential to identify a predictive signature at the individual level. The study authors have validated an in vitro model of heterotypic spheroids (SPHERTEST) composed of commercial urothelial carcinoma tumor cells and PBMCs from healthy donors. The aim of the study is to validate this model with PBMCs from UC patients to evaluate the effects of immunotherapy on the immune response and on tumor cell survival in vitro. The study hypothesis is that the outcome of the pre-therapeutic test based on a heterotypic spheroid model with PBMC from patients with advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma (SPHERTEST) is related to the response to checkpoint inhibitor (CI) treatment.

Interventions

DIAGNOSTIC_TESTSPHERTEST test

The SPHERETEST is an in vitro model of heterotypic spheroids composed of commercial urothelial carcinoma tumor cells and leukocyte mononuclear cells from healthy donors.

Sponsors

Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nīmes
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
CASE_ONLY
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patient with histologically proven urothelial carcinoma, in a locally advanced or metastatic situation with indication for immunotherapy. * The patient must have given their free and informed consent and signed the consent form * The patient must be a member or beneficiary of a health insurance plan

Exclusion criteria

* The subject is participating in a category 1 or drug monotherapy interventional study, or is in a period of exclusion determined by a previous study * It is impossible to give the subject informed information * The patient is under safeguard of justice or state guardianship * History of treatment with anti-PD1 or anti-PDL1 or anti-CTLA4 within the year. * Pregnant, parturient or breastfeeding patient.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
SPHERTEST measurement of potential therapeutic efficacyDay 0Yes/No. Differential in spheroid size before and after treatment according to the formula: R=M1-M0. R = test results, M0 = average spheroid size without immunotherapy treatment, M1 = average spheroid size with immunotherapy treatment. When R is ≤ 0, SPHERTEST = "yes" or "potential therapeutic efficacy". When R is \> 0, SPHERTEST = "no" or "absence of potential therapeutic efficacy"
Progression-free survivalMonth 12Yes/No according to RECIST criteria

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Presence of an aggressive minority componentInclusionYes/no
Type of other componentInclusionMicropapillary, microcystic, trophoblastic differentiation, epidermoid differentiation, nested, plasmacytoid, sarcomatoid, rhabdoid, lymphoepitheliomatoid, large cell, undifferentiated or neuroendocrine
Tumor gradeInclusionWHO grading
PD1/PDL1 statusInclusionYes/no
PDL1 scoreInclusionpositive/negative
Type of metastatic involvementInclusionLocally advanced (= local recurrence, or pelvic lymph node involvement) or Metastatic sites: liver, bone, lung, brain, extrapelvic lymph node, other
Primary tumor siteInclusionBladder/Urethra/upper urinary tract/Urethra
Hemoglobin levelInclusiong/dL
Lactate dehydrogenase levelInclusionUI/L
C-reactive protein levelInclusionmg/L
Neutrophil countInclusionG/L
Lymphocyte countInclusionG/L
Number of lines of systemic treatment received in the metastatic phaseInclusion0, 1, 2, ≥3
Type of platinum salt received prior to immunotherapyInclusionCisplatin or carboplatin
Treatment regimen prior to anti-PD1 therapyInclusionNeoadjuvant with progression within 12 months / Adjuvant with progression within 12 months / Initially locally advanced/metastatic
Current treatment: whether treatment is combined with another moleculeInclusionCisplatin / entoftumab-vedotin
Antibiotics in the previous monthInclusionDuration (days)
Corticosteroid therapy > 10 mg prednisolone equivalent at immunotherapy initiationInclusionYes/no
Taking an immunosuppressant other than corticosteroid therapy at immunotherapy initiationInclusionYes/no
Any comedication at immunotherapy initiationInclusionProtein pump inhibitors / beta blockers / metformin / statin
Patient functioning levelInclusionECOG Performance Status Scale (1-5)
BCG vaccineInclusionYes/no
History of auto-immune diseaseInclusionYes/no
Mitomycin therapyInclusionYes/no
Histology of cellsInclusionPure transitional cells vs predominantly transitional cells

Countries

France

Contacts

CONTACTNadine Houede
nadine.houede@chu-nimes.fr04.66.68.33.01
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORNadine Houede

CHU de Nimes

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026