Skip to content

Disposable Endoscope Platform in Third Space Endoscopic Procedures

Pilot Prospective Trial to Demonstrate Efficacy, Feasibility, and Safety of a Disposable Endoscope Platform in Third Space Endoscopic Procedures

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06738628
Enrollment
40
Registered
2024-12-17
Start date
2026-05-30
Completion date
2027-03-31
Last updated
2026-03-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Achalasia, Gastroparesis

Keywords

Per-Oral Endoscopic Myotomy, Gastric Per-Oral Endoscopic Myotomy, Disposable Endoscope

Brief summary

This is a prospective, single-arm unblinded study performed at a single tertiary center in the United States. All subjects will receive standard medical care and no experimental interventions are going to be performed. The procedures will be performed by Dr. Mohamed Othman, Dr. Salmaan Jawaid, Dr. Tara Keihanian, and Dr. Fares Ayoub. All patients undergoing third space endoscopic procedures including e-POEM and g-POEM, meeting study inclusion criteria will be screened by study coordinators for preliminary eligibility and those who meet the inclusion criteria will be approached individually for further discussion about the study and obtaining informed consent. The goal of this prospective, pilot trial is to demonstrate the efficacy, feasibility, safety, and clinical outcomes of third space endoscopic procedures completed using a disposable endoscope platform.

Detailed description

Over the past decade, therapeutic endoscopy has rapidly progressed giving rise to the fields of third space endoscopy and endoscopic surgery. In the foregut, esophageal per-oral endoscopic myotomy (e-POEM) has become the standard approach for achalasia with level I data supporting its use1. For gastroparesis, randomized clinical trial data 2 now supports gastric POEM (g-POEM) use for refractory cases with promising results particularly in diabetic and post-surgical patients. Despite the remarkable advances in endoscopic therapy, there has been comparably slower progress in innovation for endoscopic platforms. In fact, current endoscope design is not significantly different from the earliest endoscopes where tip deflection is primarily controlled by rotating dials on the shaft of the endoscope and insufflation and suction are controlled by manual pressure-controlled buttons. Original fiberoptic gastroscopes were designed to facilitate diagnostic use, where the endoscopist manipulates tip-deflection dials using both hands while viewing the intestinal mucosa through a viewer, with an assistant moving the shaft of the endoscope. This same design was then adapted for colonoscopy, and later for duodenoscopy and endoscopic ultrasound. Despite significant progress in image quality, the endoscope remains a heavy device, requiring significant dexterity and musculoskeletal fitness on behalf of the endoscopist to perform endoscopy ergonomically without risking muscle injury. In addition, endoscopes require several supportive devices to function, including a separate water pump, video processor, computer screen and if needed an electrosurgical generator, making the portability of traditional endoscopic platforms quite limited. More recently, rising concerns about infectious complications from reusable endoscopes have led to the development of several single-use endoscope platforms. A novel disposable endoscope (AMBU single-use disposable gastroscope; AMBU USA, Columbia, Md, USA) was recently approved by the U.S. Food & Drug Administration (FDA) in 2022 for use in humans. This endoscopic platform is designed for single use and comes with several advantages compared to traditional reusable endoscopes. The platform is significantly lighter, with a weight of 650 grams compared to a traditional reusable upper endoscope which weighs approximately 3900 grams. Additionally, the single use platform has a wider depth of field and significantly smaller video processor and built in portable screen. These advantages have led our group to use the endoscope for therapeutic foregut procedures including e-POEM and g-POEM with positive results. The investigators at Baylor College of Medicine most recently published a proof-of-concept experience 3 in using the disposable gastroscope for a case of e-POEM, where the significantly lighter weight of the endoscope allowed easier maneuverability and subjectively lower musculoskeletal strain for the performing endoscopist, with no negative effects on image quality or technical aspects of the procedure. Before wider adoption, these perceived benefits need to be demonstrated in a larger, prospective trial confirming non-inferiority to historical data from reusable platforms and safety.

Interventions

PROCEDURE(Esophageal or Gastric) Per-Oral Endoscopic Myotomy

Performing Per-Oral Endoscopic Myotomy for the treatment of either achalasia of the esophagus, or gastroparesis of the stomach.

Sponsors

Baylor College of Medicine
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
CASE_ONLY
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Patient is ≥ 18 years old. 2. Patients can provide informed consent. 3. Patient is referred for third space endoscopic procedure including e-POEM, g-POEM.

Exclusion criteria

1. Patient is \< 18 years old. 2. Patient refused and/or unable to provide consent. 3. Patient is a pregnant woman.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Technical SuccessDay 1 (procedure day)Defined as the ability to perform entire myotomy (procedure) with the disposable endoscope.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Total Procedure TimeDuring ProcedureTotal recorded time to perform procedure using disposable endoscope
Intraprocedural adverse eventsDuring ProcedureAdverse events emerging during procedure
Satisfactory scores on Endoscopist satisfactionImmediately following completion of the procedureSatisfactory survey: with endoscope maneuverability (1-5 Likert scale; 1 being "strongly disagree" to 5 being "strongly agree"), with endoscope functionality \[insufflation, suction, accessory passage\] (1-5 Likert scale), with endoscope image quality (1-5 Likert scale; 1 being "strongly disagree" to 5 being "strongly agree").
Scores on musculoskeletal strain surveyImmediately following completion of the procedureMusculoskeletal Strain survey: Focused on Overall strain, wrist strain, shoulders strain, and neck strain

Countries

United States

Contacts

CONTACTMohamed Othman, MD
Mohamed.Othman@bcm.edu7137980950
CONTACTFares Ayoub, MD
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORMohamed Othman, MD

Baylor College of Medicine

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 25, 2026