Skip to content

Glycoprotein Matrix-Bound Iron Improves Iron Absorption

Glycoprotein Matrix-Bound Iron Improves Absorption Compared to Ferrous Bisglycinate Chelate and Ferrous Fumarate: a Randomized Crossover Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06738199
Enrollment
17
Registered
2024-12-17
Start date
2024-02-01
Completion date
2024-04-22
Last updated
2024-12-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Evaluation of Bioavailability of Supplemental Forms of Iron

Keywords

Bioavailability, iron, absorption, postbiotic

Brief summary

A double-blind, randomized crossover study was conducted that evaluated absorption kinetics of 3 forms of dietary supplement iron by measuring iron levels in the blood after acute ingestion.

Detailed description

Background: The biotransformation of minerals through glycosylation by microorganisms, such as yeast or probiotics, can produce nutrients bound to a food matrix, potentially enhancing their bioavailability. This study aimed to compare the absorption kinetics of iron bound to a glycoprotein matrix (GPM) with those of ferrous bisglycinate chelate (FBC) and ferrous fumarate (FF). Methods: In a double-blind, crossover design, 17 participants ingested 11 mg of iron in one of three forms: GPM (Pharmachem Innovation, Kearny, NJ, USA), FBC (Ferrochel®, Balchem Corp., Montvale, NJ, USA), or FF (FerroPharma Chemicals Ltd, Hungary). Blood samples were collected at baseline and at 30-, 60-, 90-, 120-, 180-, 240-, 300-, 360-, 420-, and 480-minutes post-ingestion. Water intake was standardized throughout the protocol, and an iron-free snack was provided at 4 hours post-ingestion. Pharmacokinetic analysis was performed, with key outcome variables including the area under the concentration vs. time curve (iAUC), maximum concentration (Cmax), and time to maximum concentration (Tmax). The a priori significance level was set at p \< 0.05.

Interventions

DIETARY_SUPPLEMENTdietary iron supplementation

This study aimed to compare the absorption kinetics of iron bound to a glycoprotein matrix (GPM) with those of ferrous bisglycinate chelate (FBC) and ferrous fumarate (FF).

Sponsors

Pharmachem Innovations
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
University of Mary Hardin-Baylor
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
BASIC_SCIENCE
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

lab staff that did the analysis and lead author that performed statistical analyses

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 45 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Participants had to have a normal body weight \[body mass index (BMI) of 19-24.99 kg/m2\] and engage in recreational physical activity, as defined by the American College of Sports Medicine guidelines. * Participants must be healthy and have no diagnosed chronic disease conditions

Exclusion criteria

* Participants were not allowed to consume any nutritional supplements known to affect the measures of the current study for at least 6 weeks prior to participation, including pro-, post- and prebiotics, as well as digestive enzymes. * Individuals who were currently being treated for or diagnosed with a gastrointestinal, cardiac, respiratory, circulatory, musculoskeletal, metabolic, immune, autoimmune, psychiatric, hematological, neurological, or endocrinological disorder. * Participants whose body mass had deviated by more than 2% in the previous 30 days * Participants who were unwilling to abstain from alcohol, nicotine, and caffeine for 12 hours prior to each visit.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
plasma iron levels8 hour absorption period.Blood levels were assessed to determine if absorption rates were different between the 3 arms (forms of iron). Blood samples were taken at 30-, 60-, 90-, 120-, 180-, 240-, 300-, 360-, 420-, and 480-minutes post-ingestion.

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026