Skip to content

Analysis of the Effectiveness and Safety of RIRS Under Local Anesthesia and Its Influencing Factors

Analysis of the Effectiveness and Safety of Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery (RIRS) Under Local Anesthesia and Its Influencing Factors

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06737497
Enrollment
100
Registered
2024-12-17
Start date
2026-07-01
Completion date
2028-07-31
Last updated
2025-03-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Urolithiasis

Brief summary

Retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) is a well-established technique and is the first-line treatment option for upper urinary tract stones \<2cm. Currently, most ureteroscopic procedures are performed under general or epidural anesthesia, both of which are safe and feasible. In recent years, more and more studies have shown that retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) under local anesthesia is safe and feasible. However, we can see that the current studies on RIRS under local anesthesia are mostly case reports, and there is a lack of systematic studies on the safety and effectiveness of RIRS under local anesthesia and its influencing factors. Therefore, the researchers hope to conduct a single-center prospective observational study to explore the safety, effectiveness and influencing factors of RIRS under local anesthesia, so as to optimize the surgical process of RIRS under local anesthesia, improve the surgical success rate and ensure surgical safety。

Interventions

PROCEDUREretrograde Intrarenal Surgery ( RIRS ) under local anesthesia

retrograde Intrarenal Surgery ( RIRS ) under local anesthesia

Sponsors

The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Kidney stones or upper ureteral stones 1-4cm; 2. Age 18-70 years old; 3. American Society of Anesthesiologists(ASA) score Ⅰ, Ⅱ and Ⅲ;

Exclusion criteria

1. Surgical operations other than RIRS are required for patients with middle and lower ureteral calculi; 2. There are anatomical abnormalities, such as ureteral stenosis, urine flow diversion, ectopic kidney, horseshoe kidney, duplicate kidney, etc. 3. Severe heart, brain and lung diseases; 4. Pregnancy.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
pain score1 day after sugeryVisual Analogue Scale(VAS),The basic method is to use a moving ruler about 10cm long, with 10 scales on one side and 0 and 10 points on both ends, where 0 represents no pain and 10 represents the most unbearable pain.
Operative timeDuring surgerySurgery duration, minutes. From the insertion of the guide wire to the end of the indwelling ureteral stent.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
stone-free rateFrom enrollment to the end of treatment at 1 monthA low-dose and ultrathin 2-mm spiral CT was performed at 1 day postoperatively for evaluation of fnal SFR. Stone-free status was defined as no fragments observed or clinically insignifcant residual fragments (CIRF)\<2 mm.
Complication rate1 month after sugeryComplication is defined as any adverse event occurred intraoperatively or ≤1 month postoperatively, including intraoperative bleeding, postoperative pain and so on.The investigator will invaluate perioperative complications by modified Clavien system

Countries

China

Contacts

Primary ContactGuohua Zeng Ph.D and M.D
gzgyzgh@vip.tom.com+8613802916676
Backup ContactWen Zhong Ph.D and M.D
gzgyzhongwen@163.com+8613631320020

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026