Skip to content

Real World Effectiveness, Persistence, Tolerability, and Safety of Ofatumumab in Clinical Practice

Real World Effectiveness, Persistence, Tolerability, and Safety of Ofatumumab in Clinical Practice

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06737419
Enrollment
175
Registered
2024-12-17
Start date
2021-06-09
Completion date
2024-02-05
Last updated
2024-12-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Multiple Sclerosis

Keywords

Clinically Isolated Syndrome, Relapsing-remitting Multiple Sclerosis, Secondary Progressive Multiple Sclerosis, Primary Progressive Multiple Sclerosis

Brief summary

This was a retrospective cohort study using the electronic medical record (EMR) database from Cleveland Clinic. The data was analyzed at start of ofatumumab (OMB) therapy (baseline, defined as 6 months prior to OMB initiation) and at 6 or 12 months following initiation of OMB.

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

Novartis Pharmaceuticals
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
RETROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients who initiated OMB commercially from the time of disease modifying therapy (DMT) approval (August 2020), and * Aged 18 years or older at index date, and * Patients who met 2017 McDonald Criteria for clinically definite multiple sclerosis (MS), or * Patients diagnosed with clinically isolated syndrome (CIS) by Cleveland Clinic MS specialist.

Exclusion criteria

Those who were participating in OMB clinical trials (e.g., ARTIOS, OLIKOS)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Number of Patients Categorized by Number of RelapsesBaseline, Month 6, Month 12
Change in Relapse Rate From Baseline to Month 6 and Month 12 After Initiating OMB TreatmentFrom Baseline up to Month 6 and Month 12

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Duration of Time Between Prior DMT and Initiating OMB TreatmentBaseline
Number of Patients by Most Recent Prior DMTBaselineMost recent previous DMTs (in the last 6 months) included high efficacy and medium/low efficacy DMTs.
Number of Patients who Discontinued DMT Prior to OMB Treatment by Reason for DiscontinuationBaseline
AgeBaseline
Number of Patients per Demographic CategoryBaselineDemographics included: * Gender * Race * Ethnicity
Mean Duration of DiseaseBaseline
Number of Patients by Most Recent Disease CourseBaselineMost recent disease course (in the last 6 months) included relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS)/clinically isolated syndrome (CIS), secondary progressive MS (SPMS), and primary progressive MS (PPMS).
Number of Patients by Patient Determined Disease Steps (PDDS) ScoreBaseline, Month 6, Month 12The PDDS is a standardized rating scale which is a self-assessment scale of functional disability in MS patients primarily based on ambulation. The questionnaire contained 1 question which was scored ranging from 0 = Normal; 1 = Mild disability; 2 = Moderate disability; 3 = Gait disability; 4 = Early cane; 5 = Late cane; 6 = Bilateral support; and 7 = Wheelchair bound.
Number of Patients Categorized by ComorbidityBaseline
Number of Patients With no Prior Exposure to Disease Modifying Therapies (DMTs)Baseline
Number of Patients by Number of New Brain T2 LesionsBaseline, Month 6, Month 12
Number of Patients who Switched From a DMT to OMBBaseline
Change in Number of New Brain T2 Lesions From Baseline to Month 6 and Month 12 After Initiating OMB TreatmentFrom Baseline up to Month 6 and Month 12
Change in Number of New Brain GdE Lesions From Baseline to Month 6 and Month 12 After Initiating OMB TreatmentFrom Baseline up to Month 6 and Month 12
Change in PDDS Scores From Baseline to Month 6 and Month 12 After Initiating OMB TreatmentFrom Baseline up to Month 6 and Month 12The PDDS is a standardized rating scale which is a self-assessment scale of functional disability in MS patients primarily based on ambulation. The questionnaire contained 1 question which was scored ranging from 0 = Normal; 1 = Mild disability; 2 = Moderate disability; 3 = Gait disability; 4 = Early cane; 5 = Late cane; 6 = Bilateral support; and 7 = Wheelchair bound.
Change in Neuro-performance Tests From Baseline to Month 6 and Month 12 After Initiating OMB TreatmentFrom Baseline up to Month 6 and Month 12Neuro-performance measures included four assessments, cognitive assessment through the processing speed test (PST), upper extremity motor function through the manual dexterity test (MDT), lower extremity function through the walking speed test (WST), and vision assessment through the contrast sensitivity test (CST). PST and CST were scored based on the number of correct responses (with a higher score representing better performance), while MDT and WST were measured based on time to completion (with a lower score representing better performance).
Change in No Evidence of Disease Activity (NEDA) From Baseline to Month 6 and Month 12 After Initiating OMB TreatmentFrom Baseline up to Month 6 and Month 12When available, disability progression measures were calculated for patients. No evidence of disease activity (NEDA-2) status was defined and measured as the absence of clinical relapses and new/enlarging T2 and GdE lesions. NEDA-3 status was defined as components of NEDA-2 and absence of PDDS score worsening. NEDA-2 and NEDA-3 were only evaluated in patients who had all relevant parameters available for review.
Median Change of PDDS From Baseline to Month 6 and Month 12 After Initiation of OMB TreatmentFrom Baseline up to Month 6 and Month 12The PDDS is a standardized rating scale which is a self-assessment scale of functional disability in MS patients primarily based on ambulation. The questionnaire contained 1 question which was scored ranging from 0 = Normal; 1 = Mild disability; 2 = Moderate disability; 3 = Gait disability; 4 = Early cane; 5 = Late cane; 6 = Bilateral support; and 7 = Wheelchair bound.
Number of Patients With 20% or Greater Worsening of Neuro-performance Test Scores After Initiating OMB TreatmentMonth 6 and Month 12Neuro-performance measures included four assessments, cognitive assessment through the processing speed test (PST), upper extremity motor function through the manual dexterity test (MDT), lower extremity function through the walking speed test (WST), and vision assessment through the contrast sensitivity test (CST). PST and CST were scored based on the number of correct responses (with a higher score representing better performance), while MDT and WST were measured based on time to completion (with a lower score representing better performance).
Number of Patients With 20% or Greater Worsening of PDDS Scores After Initiating OMB TreatmentMonth 6 and Month 12The PDDS is a standardized rating scale which is a self-assessment scale of functional disability in MS patients primarily based on ambulation. The questionnaire contained 1 question which was scored ranging from 0 = Normal; 1 = Mild disability; 2 = Moderate disability; 3 = Gait disability; 4 = Early cane; 5 = Late cane; 6 = Bilateral support; and 7 = Wheelchair bound.
Number of Prior DMTsBaseline
Number of Patients by Number of New Brain Gadolinium Enhancing (GdE) LesionsBaseline, Month 6, Month 12

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026