Skip to content

Comparison of BioHPP (High Performance Polymer) - vs Titanium- vs Zirconia Abutments

Comparison of BioHPP (High Performance Polymer) - vs Titanium- vs Zirconia Abutments A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06737263
Enrollment
60
Registered
2024-12-17
Start date
2019-02-13
Completion date
2026-08-31
Last updated
2024-12-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Peri-implant Soft Tissue Healing

Brief summary

The project is a prospective, randomized, controlled study. The material BioHPP (High Performance Polymer) is compared with the gold-standard abutment materials titanium and zirconia in terms of peri-implant soft tissue healing.

Detailed description

A total of 60 participants are divided into three groups of 20 persons each. One group receives BioHPP abutments, while the two control groups receive titanium or zirconia abutments. The patients are provided with closed healing dental implants. After 3 months, following implant exposure and optical impression, the implants are restored with individual abutments. Follow-up appointments are scheduled at 3, 6, 12, 24, and 36 months after implantation. During these visits, implant healing is assessed based on clinical parameters such as probing depth, plaque index, mean bone level, and bleeding on probing.

Interventions

DEVICEBioHPP abutment

Patients in the test group receive abutments made of BioHPP

DEVICETitanium abutment

Patients in the control group receive abutments made of titanium

Patients in the control group receive abutments made of zirconia

Sponsors

Medical University of Graz
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 99 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Written informed consent * The patients must be between 18 and 99 years old. * non-smokers, former smokers, or light smokers (fewer than 10 cigarettes per day). * ASA ( American Society of Anesthesiologists) Class I or II. * There must be no pregnancy or breastfeeding period. * the patients must have an edentulous section of up to 3 teeth in the maxillary or mandibular region, where it is possible to place an implant * no allergy to any of the study-related materials

Exclusion criteria

* Patients under 18 or over 99 years old. * Heavy smokers or former heavy smokers who quit less than five years ago * Existing pregnancy or breastfeeding period. * Individuals classified as ASA Class III to V. * Presence of a polymer allergy. * Patients with severe systemic diseases, immune deficiencies, or on corticosteroid medication. * Patients undergoing local radiation or bisphosphonate therapy. * Patients requiring sinus augmentation or soft tissue augmentation. * Participation in another dental study

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Mean Bone level36 months after implantationin millimeters

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Plaque index36 months after implantationin percent
Bleeding on probing36 months after implantationin percent
Probing depth36 months after implantationin millimeters
Occurrence of complications36 months after implantation

Countries

Austria

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026