Skip to content

Buddy Tape vs. Splint for Metacarpal Shaft Fracture Recovery

Functional Treatment of Non-thumb Metacarpal Shaft Fractures. Randomized Study Evaluating Buddy Taping Versus Splint on Functional Recovery of the Hand

Status
Recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06734364
Acronym
SYNATIP
Enrollment
96
Registered
2024-12-16
Start date
2025-11-05
Completion date
2027-02-05
Last updated
2025-12-23

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Non-thumb Metacarpal Shaft Fracture

Keywords

Metacarpal shaft fracture

Brief summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to see if buddy tape can treat shaft fracture of hand long fingers as well as splint. The main question it aims to answer is: Two months after the fracture, are the hand activities as good with buddy taping as with splint? Researchers will compare buddy tape group to splint group to see if the strength of the arm is not lower with buddy tape. Participants will attend 4 visits after receiving either buddy tape or splint, to control their hand strength and the correct healing of their franture.

Detailed description

Patients will be identified in the emergency ward after x-rays are positive for a non-thumb metacarpal fracture. If they consent to participate in the study, they will be put into either the buddy taping or the short arm splint group. This decision will be made through randomization, and the physician will not select which group the patient is in. As in routine practice, the patients are seen again on D15 ± 3 days, D30 ± 5 days and D60 ± 5 days in an orthopedic consultation with X-ray to control the hand face, strict profile and 3/4. Both devices are removed at the check-up consultation on day 30 ± 5 days. The patients will then attend the end of trial visit at Day 90 ± 5 days in an orthopedic consultation with X-ray. No specific act is added by this research.

Interventions

DEVICEbuddy tape

Buddy-taping a finger dynamically splints one finger to an adjacent, uninjured finger.

DEVICEsplint

Short arm splint immobilize and maintain stability of the injured finger, the hand is immobilized in the intrinsic plus position with syndactyly of the injured finger and adjacent finger

Sponsors

Centre Hospitalier Sud Francilien
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Adult patient 2. Fingers 2 to 5 metacarpal shaft fracture, little or no displacement 3. Tilt less than or equal to thirty degrees 4. No rotation disorder 5. Patient who has given consent to participate in the study and has signed an informed consent

Exclusion criteria

1. Surgical treatment indicated 2. Patient pregnant or likely to be pregnant 3. Patient who does not speak or understand French 4. Subject under guardianship or curatorship 5. Subject not beneficiary of a social security system.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Quick Dashday 60Auto questionnaire evaluating the disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
clamp forceday 0,15,30,60 and 90Clamp force deficit measured by a hydraulic hand dynamometer
Grip forceday 0,15,30,60 and 90Grip force deficit measured by a hydraulic hand dynamometer
TPMday 0,15,30,60 and 90Total passive motion measured with a digital goniometer
TAMday 0,15,30,60 and 90Total active motion measured with a digital goniometer

Countries

France

Contacts

Primary ContactAdnan FOUFA, MD
adnan.foufa@chsf.fr33 1 61 69 55 10
Backup ContactCaroline TOURTE

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026