Skip to content

USG CMBB DSA Study

The Incidence of Inadvertent Intravascular Injection During Ultrasound-guided Cervical Medial Branch Blocks: a Fluoroscopically Controlled Study

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06731920
Enrollment
300
Registered
2024-12-13
Start date
2025-01-10
Completion date
2026-08-31
Last updated
2024-12-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cervicalgia

Keywords

Ultrasound, cervical medial branch block, safety, digital subtraction angiography

Brief summary

Injections that freeze neck joints can be done using x-rays or ultrasound imaging, which as a newer way of guiding the needle to the right spot. This study will look at how often freezing liquid goes into a blood vessel during neck injections that freeze neck joints when ultrasound guidance is used to place the needle. When this happens, it can go undetected because it does not make the patient feel any different, however it could cause a test block to be falsely negative, leading to the wrong diagnosis. Based on previous studies, we think that this happens rarely, and the purpose of this study is to prove that conclusively

Detailed description

Cervical medial branch blocks (CMBB) are commonly employed for the diagnosis and management of facet-related pain. The latter constitutes the most important cause of axial neck pain and has been implicated in 40% of all cases. In addition, the upper cervical joints can also cause cervicogenic headaches, an often-debilitating condition representing up to 20% of chronic headaches3. Well-defined pain referral patterns for each joint can help operators select the appropriate injection level. While fluoroscopy has long been the imaging standard for spinal procedures, ultrasound guidance (USG) is being increasingly adopted as an alternative and presents several advantages such as the ability to identify and avoid soft tissue structures such as blood vessels during needle insertion. From a clinical perspective, avoiding blood vessels and reducing the incidence of vascular breach can lessen the occurrence of intravascular injections that are associated with false negative diagnostic blocks. Indeed, a recent study examining the safety of USG CMBB reported a lower incidence of vascular breach than previous studies that had used fluoroscopic guidance. While these findings suggested a potential benefit associated with USG, further confirmatory studies employing digital subtraction angiography (DSA), the current imaging standard to detect intravascular spread, are required. We hypothesize that USG will be associated will a lower incidence of intravascular spread during primary needle placement than has been reported with fluoroscopic guidance.

Interventions

DIAGNOSTIC_TESTcervical medial branch block

ultrasound-guided cervical medial branch block with fluoroscopic control and digital subtraction angiography

Sponsors

University of British Columbia
CollaboratorOTHER
Montreal General Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
19 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Consenting patients over 19 years of age undergoing an ultrasound-guided cervical medial branch blocks as part of their usual care.

Exclusion criteria

Subjects with one or more of the following characteristics will be excluded from the study: Known bleeding disorder or coagulopathy Patients on antiplatelet medication other than aspirin and those on anticoagulants (coumadin, AT III agents) Inability to visualize targeted structures on ultrasound Known allergy to contrast agents

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Incidence of vascular uptakeDuring the course of needle placementIncidence of intravascular spread of contrast as determined after a review of the DSA sequences by a physician not involved in the patient's care.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Observed blood vesselsDuring needle placementNumber and distribution of vessels observed near the target.
Incidence of vascular breachDuring needle placementIncidence of vascular breach during needle placement.
Number of needle repositioningsDuring needle placementNumber of needle repositionings required (before and after DSA)
ComplicationsFrom beginning to completion of block procedureOccurrence of any block-related complications.

Countries

Canada

Contacts

Primary ContactRoderick J Finlayson, MD
roderick.finlayson@mac.com250-860-9754

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026