Skip to content

HS ABSCESSES: I&D VS PUNCH DEBRIDEMENT

ABSCESS DRAINAGE in HIDRADENITIS SUPPURATIVA: INCISION and DRAINAGE VERSUS PUNCH DEBRIDEMENT

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06731309
Acronym
HSPUNCH
Enrollment
72
Registered
2024-12-12
Start date
2025-02-28
Completion date
2027-04-30
Last updated
2024-12-12

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Hidradenitis Suppurativa (Acne Inversa)

Keywords

punch biopsy tool, drainage, abscess, I&D

Brief summary

This randomized-control trial is designed to determine the recurrence rate of HS abscesses following drainage via two methods: I&D with a linear incision and PD with an 8mm punch biopsy. In this context, recurrence is a newly described HS abscess adjacent to or within the previously operated area, for which a second intervention is deemed necessary. We hypothesize that PD may yield a more favorable recurrence rate. In addition to comparing recurrence rates, this randomized-control trial will also evaluate postprocedural pain, the occurrence and type of complications, and patients' quality of life associated with both procedures. These additional factors are crucial in assessing the overall effectiveness and patient satisfaction associated with each method, further informing the potential establishment of PD as the new gold standard for draining small, painful, acute HS abscesses.

Interventions

PROCEDUREPunch Debridement

A punch biopsy tool is positioned over the inflamed follicular unit, and a small circle of skin (4 to 8 mm in diameter) is excised. A firm twisting motion is necessary to ensure adequately deep excision.

Incision and Drainage is a minimally invasive surgical procedure often employed for the treatment of intensely painful, tense, and fluctuant abscesses that are too deep to drain spontaneously. After administration of a broad circumferential local anesthetic, a small linear incision is made using a standard scalpel blade. Digital pressure is applied to expel the fluid collection. Saline rinses can be used to flush out the remaining contents. This method offers instant pain relief, commonly performed in acute settings by dermatologists, emergency department physicians and general practitioners

Sponsors

Erasmus Medical Center
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

RCT with two intervention groups, one of which is gold standard intervention

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
16 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Diagnosed with HS * Has an abscess requiring drainage with a maximum diameter of 5 centimeters. * Age 16 years or older * Willing and able to provide informed consent

Exclusion criteria

* Has other conditions that could interfere with the study, as estimated by physician * Unable to comply with follow-up visits * Allergic to lidocaine and/or adrenaline.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Recurrence1 monthRecurrence rate in percentage of abscesses recurring after drainage

Countries

Netherlands

Contacts

Primary ContactHessel H van der Zee, MD, PhD
h.vanderzee@erasmusmc.nl+31 10 704 0110

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026