Skip to content

Significance of Misoprostol-induced Cervical Ripening Prior to Hysteroscopy

Significance of Misoprostol-induced Cervical Ripening Prior to Hysteroscopy

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06726278
Enrollment
539
Registered
2024-12-10
Start date
2022-08-01
Completion date
2024-07-30
Last updated
2024-12-10

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cervical Ripening, Hysteroscopy

Keywords

Misoprostol, Cervical Ripening, Hysteroscopy, Cervical Dilation

Brief summary

The goal of this prospective study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of misoprostol for cervical ripening prior to hysteroscopy

Detailed description

This prospective study was conducted at Gynecology Department of Hayatabad Medical Complex Peshawar from Aug 2022 to July 2024. Total 539 women's whose elective hysteroscopy was planned were enrolled. Eligible subjects were non-pregnant women between the ages of 18-45, and were confirmed to be so with a negative urine pregnancy test. Before undergoing hysteroscopy, the participants required to have indicators for hysteroscopy (atypical bleeding per vagina and/or infertility; at suspected pathology in utero), with no previous history of surgery or significant cervical pathologies. Exclusion criteria were: any contraindication, such as allergy to prostaglandins, active pelvic infection; severe cardiovascular, hepatic and/or renal disease or previous uterine perforation/cervical incompetence. Approval from Institutional Review Board was obtained under ref # 860. Patients were divided into two groups based on the administration of misoprostol: Group A (n=300) received 400 µg of misoprostol, administered vaginally, 12 hours prior to the scheduled hysteroscopy. Group B (n=239) did not receive misoprostol and served as the control group. Patients and the clinicians who undertook hysteroscopy were blinded to group assignments. It ordered the misoprostol and placebo tablets separately from a hospital pharmacy so they would look identical. Hysteroscopic Procedure All hysteroscopic procedures were done in the standard conditions with 5.50 mm rigid Hysteroscope (Karl Storz, Germany). The patients were placed in the lithotomy position, and a tenaculum was used to apply anteflexion of the cervix before insertion. The cervical dilation achieved was measured using Hegar dilators in increments of 1 mm until the hysteroscope could be inserted without resistance. The primary outcome was the amount of cervical dilation achieved on entry to hysteroscopy. The secondary outcomes were: requirement for mechanical dilation, procedure time (from hysteroscope insertion to withdrawal), patient-reported pain score using Visual Analog Scale (VAS) during the procedures, incident of cervical laceration and adverse events including cramping, bleeding per vagina abnormal gastrointestinal discomfort and fever. Data Collection / analysis Age, parity, and the reason for hysteroscopy were among the baseline demographic data that were gathered. Information was documented during the hysteroscopic procedure, including cervical dilatation, procedure duration, and any complications. Following the surgery, patients used the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) to rate their level of pain. After the surgery, adverse effects were tracked and recorded for up to 24 hours. Using SPSS version 25.0, statistical analysis was carried out, with a significance level set at p-value ≤0.05.

Interventions

Misoprostol 400 µg is a synthetic prostaglandin E1 analog used in this clinical trial to evaluate its effects in inducing uterine contractions or labor. This dosage form is typically administered orally, and its primary mechanism involves the softening and dilation of the cervix, making it a common choice in obstetric practices for labor induction. The study will evaluate its efficacy and safety profile when compared to the placebo group. Misoprostol is administered in a single dose of 400 µg, and participants will be monitored for any adverse reactions or labor-related outcomes.

DRUGPlacebo

participants will receive a placebo treatment, consisting of an inert substance that has no active pharmacological effect. The placebo is administered in the same manner (vaginally) and at the same time point as Misoprostol, but without any therapeutic action. This group is used to control for potential psychological effects of the intervention, ensuring that any observed

Sponsors

Khyber Teaching Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Hayat Abad Medical Complex, Peshawar
Lead SponsorOTHER_GOV

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

Although this study is an observational study, masking was used to minimize bias in the assessment of outcomes. The participants were blinded to the group allocation (misoprostol or placebo). Additionally, the care providers performing the hysteroscopic procedures were also blinded to the group assignments to avoid any bias in procedural conduct or outcome reporting. The investigators and outcomes assessors involved in the data analysis were also unaware of the group allocation, ensuring impartial evaluation of the results. This blinding process was maintained throughout the study to minimize bias and enhance the reliability of the observed outcomes. Since this study does not involve random assignment or an investigational treatment, it is important to note that masking was implemented as part of the observational design to preserve the validity of the findings, despite the lack of intervention assignment typically seen in clinical trials.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to 45 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Non-pregnant women aged 18-45 years. * Confirmed non-pregnancy with a negative urine pregnancy test. * No history of prior surgery or significant cervical pathologies. * Atypical bleeding per vagina. * Infertility. * Suspected uterine pathology.

Exclusion criteria

* Contraindications to prostaglandins, such as: * Allergy to prostaglandins. * Active pelvic infection. * Severe cardiovascular, hepatic, and/or renal disease. * Previous uterine perforation. * Cervical incompetence.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Cervical Ripening Success RateDuring the hysteroscopy procedure (up to 30 minutes).Proportion of patients achieving adequate cervical dilation with misoprostol alone, defined as a minimum dilation of \[specific measure, e.g., 6mm without mechanical dilation\].

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Requirement for Mechanical DilationDuring the hysteroscopy procedure (up to 30 minutes).The proportion of patients requiring additional mechanical dilation during the hysteroscopy procedure.
Procedure TimeDuring the hysteroscopy procedure (up to 30 minutes).Time taken for the entire hysteroscopy procedure, from insertion to withdrawal of the hysteroscope.
VAS Pain ScoreImmediately after the hysteroscopy procedure.Patient-reported pain scores during the hysteroscopy procedure, assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain).
Incidence of Cervical LacerationsDuring the hysteroscopy procedure (up to 30 minutes).Proportion of patients experiencing cervical lacerations during the hysteroscopy procedure.
Incidence of Adverse EventsUp to 24 hours after the hysteroscopy procedure.Incidence of adverse events, including cramping, bleeding, gastrointestinal discomfort, and fever.

Countries

Pakistan

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026