Skip to content

Safety and Efficacy Evaluation of High Intensity Focused Ultrasound Device in Eyebrow Lifting

Safety and Efficacy Evaluation of High Intensity Focused Ultrasound Device in Eyebrow Lifting, a Prospective, Multi-center, Evaluator Blinded, Randomized, Non-treatment Controlled, and Superiority Clinical Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06724510
Enrollment
180
Registered
2024-12-09
Start date
2024-11-18
Completion date
2025-12-18
Last updated
2026-05-15

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Facial Wrinkles and Rhytides Reduction, Skin Laxity, Wrinkles

Keywords

High Intensity Focused Ultrasound, HIFU, ULTRAFORMER MPT, ULTRAFORMER, MPT, Eyebrow, Eyebrow Lifting

Brief summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to assess the safety and efficacy of the high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) device, ULTRAFORMER MPT (UF4-M400), developed by CLASSYS Inc., for eyebrow lifting. This study is a prospective, multicenter, evaluator-blinded, randomized, non-treatment-controlled, superiority clinical trial. The main questions the study seeks to answer are: Does the ULTRAFORMER MPT device effectively lift eyebrows? Is the safety profile of the ULTRAFORMER MPT device acceptable? Researchers will compare the investigational device to a non-treatment control group to determine whether the HIFU device demonstrates superiority in eyebrow lifting outcomes. Participant Details: Participants will receive a single treatment session using the investigational device or be assigned to the non-treatment control group. Follow-up will occur over 3 months to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of the treatment. Outcomes: Primary Outcome: Eyebrow lifting improvement, assessed through standardized photographic evaluation and other aesthetic measurement tools. Secondary Outcomes: Participant satisfaction using the Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) and pain assessment using a Visual Analog Scale (VAS). Safety Measures: Monitoring for adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) throughout the study period. This trial aims to provide robust evidence supporting the use of the ULTRAFORMER MPT for non-invasive eyebrow lifting.

Interventions

DEVICEHIFU treatment with ULTRAFOMER MPT

The high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) treatment, which is the primary intervention being evaluated for efficacy and safety in eyebrow lifting.

Sponsors

CLASSYS Inc.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
20 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

1. Age: 20 to 65 years old at the time of consent. 2. Condition: Forehead skin laxity with Forehead Lines Grading Scale score of 1-3. 3. Consent: Ability to understand trial details, voluntarily participate, and comply with treatment and follow-up.

Exclusion criteria

1. Skin Conditions: Hyperpigmentation, tattoos, scars, active skin diseases, or other conditions (e.g., eczema, psoriasis, vitiligo) in the treatment area that may affect efficacy or increase risk. 2. Medical Devices or Implants: Presence of metal implants or embedded electronic devices in the treatment area. 3. Health Conditions: Severe dysfunction of vital organs (e.g., heart, liver, kidneys), autoimmune diseases, or uncontrolled diabetes. 4. Medications: Recent use of anti-thrombotic agents, NSAIDs, or other drugs affecting coagulation within one week before screening. 5. Prior Treatments: Use of fillers (e.g., hyaluronic acid, collagen) or cosmetic procedures (e.g., laser therapy, botulinum toxin) in the treatment area within the specified timeframes. 6. Pregnancy: Women who are pregnant, nursing, or not using birth control during the trial.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Global Aestetic Improvement Scale(GAIS)3 months after treatment/randomizationImprovement was defined as GAIS score≤3 Min 1 Max 5 1. Very much improved 2. Much improved 3. Improved 4. No Change 5. Worse

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Global Aestetic Improvement Scale(GAIS)1, 3, 6 months after treatment/randomizationby Blinded Evaluators, Investigators, and Participant Subects

Countries

China

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: May 16, 2026