Skip to content

Photofunctionalization With UVC

Effect of Photofunctionalization With on Titanium Dental Implants. A Pilot Sutdy

Status
Recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06724107
Acronym
EPID
Enrollment
60
Registered
2024-12-09
Start date
2024-12-12
Completion date
2026-04-20
Last updated
2024-12-09

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Implant Site Reaction

Keywords

ISQ (implant stability quotient), inmediate loading, UVC, dental implants

Brief summary

Summary: Objective: The general objective is to compare the placement of standard implants with a surface photofunctionalization technique based on ultraviolet C radiation (UVC), having as working hypothesis that this photofunctionalization will accelerate the bone apposition on the implant surface and increase the amount of bone that binds to the implant, making it possible to load these photofunctionalized implants in less time. Design: Pilot, clinical, randomized, prospective, controlled, single-center, prospective study. Scope of the study: Master's Degree in Oral Surgery and Implantology. Faculty of Dentistry. Complutense University of Madrid. Subjects of the study: patients attending the Master's Degree in Oral Surgery and Implantology for rehabilitation with dental implants, regardless of the sector in which they have missing teeth. Key words: ISQ (implant stability quotient), inmediate loading, UVC, dental implants.

Interventions

RADIATIONUVC

It is proposed to evaluate and compare the ISQ at 1 week, 2 weeks, 3 weeks and 4 weeks in patients undergoing implant placement surgery by comparing photofunctionalised (study group) and non-photofunctionalised (control group) implants in both native bone and grafted bone. To assess whether immediate loading can be carried out before 4 weeks and how long the waiting time for implant loading can be reduced, by performing predictability curves.

Sponsors

Universidad Complutense de Madrid
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Masking description

blinding

Intervention model description

randomized clinical trial

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Patients over 18 years of age. * Patients requiring dental implant surgery with or without bone or soft tissue regeneration surgery. * Acceptance of the informed consent document.

Exclusion criteria

* Subjects with systemic diseases leading to untreated or uncontrolled haemostasis or coagulation disturbances. * Subjects with active infectious diseases (tuberculosis, HIV, syphilis, hepatitis, etc). * Patients under pharmacological treatment with monoclonal antibodies, bisphosphonates, chemotherapy or prolonged treatment with corticoids. * Patients with alcoholism or drug addiction. * Pregnant or breastfeeding women.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Bone regeneration3 monthsBone implant contact (BIC) Histotogic parameter in percentage

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
ISQ and marginal bone loss12 monthsImplant stability quotient and marginal bone loss measure with X-rays (quantitative parameter)

Countries

Spain

Contacts

Primary Contactjesus gd torres, PhD
jesus.torres@ucm.es+34653050071

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026