Skip to content

GUIDE-CAC: Statin-Ezetimibe Without Aspirin vs. Statin Monotherapy With Aspirin in High Coronary Calcification

Comparison of Intensive Lipid-Lowering Therapy With a Statin-Ezetimibe Combination (Without Aspirin) vs. Statin Monotherapy (With Aspirin) In Asymptomatic Patient With Coronary Artery Calcification

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06722521
Enrollment
7435
Registered
2024-12-09
Start date
2025-07-09
Completion date
2032-10-31
Last updated
2025-08-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Primary Prevention, Vascular Calcification

Keywords

Cardiovascular Diseases, Aspirin, Statin

Brief summary

A Multicenter, randomized trial comparing the efficacy and safety of intensive lipid-lowering therapy using a statin-ezetimibe combination without aspirin versus statin monotherapy with aspirin in asymptomatic patients with coronary artery calcification

Detailed description

Coronary artery calcification is a well-established marker of subclinical atherosclerosis that effectively identifies high-risk individuals for cardiovascular events, even in asymptomatic patients. However, the optimal intensity of preventive interventions-particularly regarding the balance between efficacy and safety-remains unclear in asymptomatic patients with significant coronary calcification. While aspirin has traditionally been used for the primary prevention of cardiovascular events, recent evidence suggests that its routine use in asymptomatic individuals may carry greater bleeding risks than cardiovascular benefits. In contrast, intensive lipid-lowering therapy with statins and ezetimibe has proven effective in reducing LDL-C levels and preventing cardiovascular events by slowing atherosclerotic progression and stabilizing plaques. This study aims to evaluate whether intensive lipid-lowering therapy using a statin-ezetimibe combination (without aspirin) is non-inferior to statin monotherapy (with aspirin) in reducing cardiovascular events among patients with significant coronary artery calcification. By comparing these two strategies, we seek to establish whether more aggressive lipid management might obviate the need for aspirin in these intermediate- to high-risk yet asymptomatic patients.

Interventions

DRUGPitavastatin 4mg and ezetimibe 10mg, taken once daily

Intensive lipid-lowering therapy without aspirin

DRUGPitavastatin 2 mg with aspirin 100 mg, taken once daily.

Moderate-intensity lipid-lowering therapy with aspirin

Sponsors

Asan Medical Center
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
19 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Adults aged 19 years and older 2. Asymptomatic patients with significant coronary calcification (Agatston score ≥ 100) and no physiologically significant coronary artery disease (CAD) * The coronary CT scan used to establish the CAC score must be performed within 3 years prior to randomization. * The assessment of physiological significance must be performed within 6 months prior to randomization 3. Participants will be eligible for inclusion regardless of prior statin or anti-platelet agents use.

Exclusion criteria

1. Major ASCVD events (clinically documented ASCVD) If at least one of the following criteria is present via patient history, physical examination, or medical records at the time of screening, the patient is not eligible: * Acute coronary syndrome (MI or unstable angina) * Coronary revascularization (PCI, CABG) or other arterial revascularization * Ischemic stroke (Not TIA) * Symptomatic peripheral arterial disease (history of claudication with ABI \<0.90, or previous revascularization or amputation 2. Patients with physiologically significant CAD * Moderate to severe CAD (diameter stenosis \>50%) on CCTA with positive strest test (thallium, treadmil, stress echocardiography) * Moderate to severe CAD (diameter stenosis \>50%) on CAG with positive fractional flow reserve (FFR) \< 0.8 3. Patients with familial hypercholesterolemia. 4. Patients with low-density lipoproteins cholesterol (LDL-C) ≥ 190 mg/dL regardless taking a statin or not. 5. Continuation of PCSK9 inhibitor is required during the clinical trial 6. Patients with chronic kidney disease (\<eGFR 30mL/min/1.73m2) 7. Advanced liver disease (Child-Pugh B or C) 8. Hepatic disease or biliary tract obstruction, or significant hepatic enzyme elevation (ALT or AST \> 5 times upper limit of normal). 9. History of gastrointestinal bleeding, peptic ulcer, or intracranial hemorrhage within 6 months prior screening 10. Patients with a history of organ transplantation who are on immunosuppressive therapy 11. Concurrent use of other medications that may increase bleeding risk such NOAC and warfarin 12. A history of significant allergic reaction to aspirin or statin/ezetimibe 13. A diagnosis of cancer (other than superficial squamous or basal cell skin cancer) in the past 3 years or current treatment for the active cancer. 14. Life expectancy \< 1 years for any non-cardiac or cardiac causes. 15. Patient's pregnant or breast-feeding or child-bearing potential. 16. Any clinically significant abnormality identified at the screening visit, physical examination, laboratory tests, or electrocardiogram which, in the judgment of the Investigator, would preclude safe completion of the study. 17. Unwillingness or inability to comply with the procedures described in this protocol

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Event rate of a major adverse cardiovascular events48monthsDeath from any cause, myocardial infarction, stroke, urgent coronary revascularization, resuscitated cardiac arrest, or unstable angina related hospitalization

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Event rate of a urgent coronary revascularization48months1. Elective: 2. Urgent: 3. Emergency: 4. Salvage:
Event rate of a Resuscitated cardiac arrest48months
Event rate of a stroke48monthsA. Ischemic Stroke B. Hemorrhagic Stroke C. Undetermined Stroke
Event rate of a all cause death48monthsAll-cause mortality was used instead of cardiac mortality to avoid potentially difficult adjudication of causes of death, especially given the relatively low expected mortality rate. In addition, the cause of death will be adjudicated as being due to cardiovascular causes, non-cardiovascular causes, or undetermined causes.
Event rate of a cardiovascular death48monthsincludes death resulting from an acute myocardial infarction (MI), sudden cardiac death, death due to heart failure (HF), death due to stroke, death due to cardiovascular (CV) procedures, death due to CV hemorrhage, and death due to other CV causes
Event rate of a unstable angina related hospitalization48months
Event rate of a composite of hard outcomes (all cause death, myocardial infarction and ischemic stroke)48months
Event rate of a Clinically relevant bleeding (Bleeding Academic Research Consortium definition ≥ type 2)48monthsBleeding Academic Research Consortium definition ≥ type 2
Changes of Lipid profile48months
Treatment-emergent Serious Adverse Events resulting in Study Drug Discontinuation48monthsLiver function abnormalities(AST or ALT \> 5x ULN) Renal function abnormalities (serum creatinine increase ≥3-fold from baseline OR increase to ≥4.0 mg/dL OR initiation of renal replacement therapy) Muscle-related events (Statin-associated muscle symptoms OR CK \>5x ULN) (CK reference range: 50-250 IU/L)
Event rate of a spontaneous myocardial infarction48monthsA spontaneous myocardial infarction related to atherosclerotic plaque rupture, ulceration, fissuring, erosion, or dissection, resulting in intraluminal thrombus in one or more of the coronary arteries

Countries

South Korea

Contacts

Primary ContactSeung-Whan Lee
seungwlee@amc.seoul.kr82230103170

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026