Skip to content

Evaluation of Different Attachments on Implant-Retained Mandibular Overdenture.

Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of Different Attachments on Implant-Retained Mandibular Overdenture.

Status
Recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06721377
Acronym
Overdenture
Enrollment
10
Registered
2024-12-06
Start date
2023-09-01
Completion date
2025-01-01
Last updated
2024-12-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Edentulism, Edentulism in Lower Jaw

Keywords

overdenture, implant placemnent, Novaloc attachment., Equator attachment, edentulism

Brief summary

Patients will be selected from the outpatient clinic of Removable Prosthodontic Department. Faculty of Dental Medicine for Girls, Al-Azhar University.. Each patient will be assessed for eligibility and Informed consent will be obtained from patient after explanation of the treatment protocols and expected outcomes or alternative management.

Detailed description

All 10 patients will receive upper complete dentures and lower complete overdentures. The upper complete denture will be mucosa supported and the lower complete denture will be supported and retained for all patients by two dental implants in the inter-foraminal region. Patients will be divided into two groups, one group will be loaded by Novaloc attachment. While the other group will be loaded by Equator attachment. Implants will be functionally loaded after three months of insertion.

Interventions

upper complete dentures and lower complete overdentures. The upper complete denture will be mucosa supported and the lower complete denture will be supported and retained for all patients by two dental implants in the inter-foraminal region & will be loaded by Novaloc attachment.

upper complete dentures and lower complete overdentures. The upper complete denture will be mucosa supported and the lower complete denture will be supported and retained for all patients by two dental implants in the inter-foraminal region& will be loaded by Equator attachment.

Sponsors

Al-Azhar University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
65 Years to 69 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* All patients' ridges should be covered with firm mucosa which is free from any signs of inflammation or ulceration. * Patients should be free from any bone disorder and exhibit adequate height and width of the residual alveolar ridge. * All patients must have sufficient inter arch space.

Exclusion criteria

* Patients with oral or systemic diseases. * Patients with xerostomia or excessive salivation. * Patients with parafunctional habits (bruxism or clenching). * Heavy smoker or alcoholic patients. * Patients with history of temporo-mandibular dysfunction. * Patients with brain disorders or psychiatric disorders.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Radiographic evaluation of bone heightat baseline, 6 and 12 monthsRadiographic evaluation of bone height around each implant and at distal extension area will be evaluated using cone beam CT (CBCT)
Radiographic evaluation of bone densityat baseline, 6 and 12 monthsRadiographic evaluation of bone density around implant and at distal extension area will be evaluated using cone beam CT (CBCT)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Pocket depthat baseline, 6 and 12 monthsPocket depth will be measured using periodontal probe

Countries

Egypt

Contacts

Primary ContactSara H Kadry, masters
Sarra.kadry@miuegypt.edu.eg02-01226595217

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026