Skip to content

Upper-limb Functional Recovery With Virtual Reality System (BTs-Nirvana) Associated With Conventional Therapy in Hospitalized Subacute Stroke Patients

Upper-limb Functional Recovery With Virtual Reality System (BTs-Nirvana) Associated With Conventional Therapy in Hospitalized Subacute Stroke Patients

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06720194
Enrollment
18
Registered
2024-12-06
Start date
2020-11-17
Completion date
2023-04-03
Last updated
2024-12-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Subacute Stroke

Keywords

stroke rehabilitation, upper limb recovery, physical therapy, virtual reality therapy, daily-life activities, randomized controlled trial

Brief summary

The goal of this pilot study is to evaluate if a semi-inmersive virtual reality device works in the recovery of the function of the upper limb affected in hospitalized patients who have suffered a stroke. Reseachers will compare the virtual reality device plus the usual treatment to usual treatment to see if virtual reality device works to recovery upper limb function. Participants will be able to receive conventional treatment or virtual therapy plus conventional treatment 5 days a week for 4 weeks. When they are discharged, they will come to the hospital 2 times to be reviewed, 3 months and 1 year after receiving treatment.

Interventions

Virtual therapy has been applied for four weeks, three times a week. We administered a total of twelve sessions with a duration of 30 minutes each. Prior to virtual therapy experimental group have received kinesitherapy for 15 minutes to improve and prevent muscle spasticity and joint contractures. Therapists recorded the order of the session and they have providen the same external aid to all patients. Two days a week the experimental group have received the conventional treatment for 45 minutes (kinesitherapy, strengthening exercises muscle, trunk control, transfers, standing and walking). In addition to physiotherapy treatment, participants have done occupational therapy 5 days a week (training to perform ADLs, tracking techniques and search, manipulation, reach and grasping of different utensils, etc.), for 30 minutes each session.

OTHERUsual treatment

Patients assigned to the control group have received the conventional treatment five days a week. They have done physiotherapy session and occupational therapy for 45 and 30 minutes a day each one.

Sponsors

Fundación Pública Andaluza para la Investigación de Málaga en Biomedicina y Salud
CollaboratorOTHER
Lorena Aguilar Cano
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke confirmed by neuroimaging. * No previous stroke. * Subacute phase (between 1 and 6 months after the stroke). * Ability to sit with or without support. * Maximum 4 on the Muscle Strength Scale (MRC) for shoulder flexion and flexion-extension of the elbow of the upper limb on the affected side. * Ability to understand and accept study procedures and to sign an informed consent having been previously informed.

Exclusion criteria

* Previous history of brain injury, stroke and neurological or neuropsychiatric diseases. * Cognitive alterations, dementia, aphasia or other alteration that causes inability to understand the meaning of the study. * Clinical inestability * Loss of visual capacity that difficults recognizing figures on the screen. * Orthopedic conditions involving upper limbs. * Refusal to participate in the study.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Upper limb motor function as assessed by Fugl-Meyer Upper-Limb scale (FM-UL)at baseline, 4 weeks, 3 months and a year after treatmentThe maximum value of the motor function in the FM-UL scale is 66 points. A higher score corresponds to a better state of operation of the patient.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Daily-life activities as assessed as Barthel Index (BI)at baseline, 4 weeks, 3 months and a year after treatmentBI evaluates 10 daily-life activities: eating, wash, dress, groom, defecate, urinate, go to the toilet, move, chair-bed, ambulation, going up and down stairs. The total score ranges from 0 to 100. The global results are grouped into four categories of dependency: total, severe, moderate or mild. Lower score means subject has more dependence ant higher score means more independence.
Trunk control as assessed as Control Trunk Test (TCT)at baseline, 4 weeks, 3 months and a year after treatmentTCT is a simple test that explores four movements. Each of the sections are scored as follows: 0 points if the patient is unable to perform the movement without assistance, 12 points if able to perform the movement abnormally and 25 points if the patient is able to complete the movement normally. The total score is the sum of the results of the four tests and its value can range from 0 to 100.
Daily-life activities as assessed as Self-Assessment of Role Performance and Activities of Daily Living (SARA-TM)at baseline, 4 weeks, 3 months and a year after treatmentSARA-TM is a questionnaire that users fill out with the orientation of the therapists. It is based on their perceptions of various daily-life activities. We have asked about items related to self-care, food, maintenance of postures, movement, manipulation and pain. Each one of the domains consists of different items that correspond to different activities. Each item is scored from 0 to 4 depending on the degree of difficulty in performing the activities. Lower values represent better function

Countries

Spain

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026