Skip to content

Management Modalities of Chronic Pelvic Pain

Laparoscopic Presacral Neurectomy Versus Fluoroscopically Guided Superior Hypogastric Plexus Neurolysis for Treatment of Chronic Pelvic Pain: A Double-Blind, Randomized Controlled Trial.

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06719635
Enrollment
62
Registered
2024-12-06
Start date
2024-12-07
Completion date
2026-12-01
Last updated
2026-05-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Pain, Chronic

Brief summary

Chronic pelvic pain remains a challenging disorder to treat because of the complexities of pain sensation and unclear etiology. Standard medical and surgical treatments seldom prove effective at improving quality of life and pain intensity among affected women.

Detailed description

Chronic pelvic pain remains a challenging disorder to treat because of the complexities of pain sensation and unclear etiology. Standard medical and surgical treatments seldom prove effective at improving quality of life and pain intensity among affected women. The current study will investigate whether Laparoscopic Presacral Neurectomy or Fluoroscopically Guided Superior Hypogastric Plexus Neurolysis is more effective for treating chronic pelvic pain.

Interventions

PROCEDURELaparoscopic Presacral Neurectomy

Laparoscopy will be performed under general anesthesia. Then, nerve plexuses will be identified and freed from their underlying tissue, which contains the left common iliac and middle sacral veins. This will be followed by cauterization and cutting of the nerve plexuses.

PROCEDUREFluoroscopically guided Superior Hypogastric Plexus Neurolysis

The patients will receive fluoroscopically guided Superior Hypogastric Plexus Neurolysis using 3 mL of 75% ethanol and Radiofrequency of the Sacral nerve Roots 2-4.

Sponsors

Zagazig University
Lead SponsorOTHER_GOV

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
21 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patient acceptance. * Body mass index \< 35 kg/m2. * Adult patients with chronic pelvic and perineal pain due to pelvic cancer. * Visual Analog Scale pain score ≥ 5 on a 0-10 scale despite treatment with a standard analgesic.

Exclusion criteria

* Uncooperative patient. * Patients with coagulopathy, infection at the site of injection, severe cardiac compromise, or intolerance to sympathetic block.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Visual analogue pain scoreAt the end of the first month after the procedure.The percentage of patients who achieved \> 50% decline in their Visual analogue pain score "from the baseline value" before intervention at the end of the first month.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Daily analgesic requirementsAt the end of the first 2 weeks, 1st month, 2nd month, 3rd month, and 6th month after the procedure.Daily analgesic requirements at the end of the first 2 weeks, 1st month, 2nd month, 3rd month, and 6th month after the procedure.
Associated adverse eventsAt the end of the first month after the procedure.Any related adverse events "e.g. hypotension, bleeding or neurological deficits" in the first month after the procedure.

Countries

Egypt

Contacts

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORAbdalla Mohamed Gouda, MD

Department of Anesthesia, Intensive Care & Pain Management, Zagazig University

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: May 7, 2026