Skip to content

Risk Factors Associated With the Progression of Adenomyosis

Risk Factors Associated With The Progression Of Adenomyosis

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06718088
Enrollment
258
Registered
2024-12-05
Start date
2022-06-01
Completion date
2026-06-01
Last updated
2024-12-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Adenomyosis

Keywords

adenomyosis, risk factors, transvaginal ultrasound

Brief summary

Adenomyosis is a gynaecological disorder with a high prevalence in women of childbearing age and is characterised by the presence of endometrial glands and stroma within the myometrium, associated or not with hypertrophy and hyperplasia of the surrounding myometrium. Adenomyosis may cause pelvic pain and/or abnormal uterine bleeding. Transvaginal ultrasound (TVUS) is considered the main non-invasive diagnostic modality for the diagnosis of adenomyosis. Although adenomyosis is a very common condition among patients of childbearing age, its natural course is still debated. Some studies have evaluated the role of hormonal treatments (systemic or local oestrogen or progestin-based) on adenomyosis, which have been effective in controlling symptoms such as pelvic pain and abnormal uterine bleeding. Despite all this, no evidence is available on the progression of adenomyosis and the factors that may influence its progression over time. The aim of this study is therefore to assess the progression of adenomyosis and associated risk factors using transvaginal ultrasound.

Detailed description

Adenomyosis is a gynaecological disorder with a high prevalence in women of childbearing age and is characterised by the presence of endometrial glands and stroma within the myometrium, associated or not with hypertrophy and hyperplasia of the surrounding myometrium. Adenomyosis may cause pelvic pain and/or abnormal uterine bleeding. Transvaginal ultrasound is considered the main non-invasive diagnostic modality for the diagnosis of adenomyosis. The goal of formulating a recognised and unified terminology for the description of ultrasound criteria for the diagnosis of adenomyosis was achieved by the Morphological Uterus Sonographic Assessment (MUSA) consensus. The MUSA consensus consists of a list of ultrasound features associated with adenomyosis, namely: * globular uterus: uterus with a more spherical conformation and more slender bottom than normal. The definition of a 'globular uterus' is currently subjective and there are no quantitative uterine biometric parameters available to differentiate a uterus with adenomyosis from a uterus not affected by the disease (normal or fibromatous uterus). * asymmetric thickening of the uterine walls; * inhomogeneous eco-structure due to the presence of multiple hyperechogenic striae intermixed with hypoechogenic striae (thin shadow cones) giving the typical ultrasound appearance described as 'rain in the forest' or 'fan-shaped shadowing'; * cystic spaces or non-vascularised intra-myometrial anecogenic lacunae, often surrounded by a hyper-echogenic halo, caused by glandular ectasia; * hyperechogenic islands deepening in the myometrium, expression of the presence of islands of ectopic endometrial tissue; * subendometrial lines and spicules; * intralesional and irregular vascularisation of the myometrium (vessels penetrate in a rectilinear within adenomyomas or foci of adenomyosis); * poor definition of the endometrium/myometrium junction (JZ); * thickening, irregularities and interruptions of the JZ. To these ultrasound features summarised by the MUSA consensus, the literature adds two that are considered equally typical of the pathology: * uterine pain on pressure of the ultrasound probe; * the 'question mark sign', i.e. a pathological angle at the uterine fundus, an expression of uterine anatomical distortion. Previous studies on the occurrence of adenomyosis have been limited to women undergoing hysterectomy, probably overestimating its prevalence compared to the general population. Recent studies, on the other hand, have begun to investigate the morphological features of adenomyosis using TVUS, an inexpensive and widely available method, to determine its prevalence and the factors that may influence its onset. They defined a prevalence of the condition as 20.9% among women attending a gynaecological outpatient setting. Although adenomyosis is a very common condition among patients of childbearing age, its natural evolution is still debated. Some studies have evaluated the role of hormonal treatments (systemic or local oestrogen or progestin-based) on adenomyosis, which have been effective in controlling symptoms such as pelvic pain and abnormal uterine bleeding. Despite all this, no evidence is available regarding the progression of adenomyosis and the factors that may influence its progression over time. The aim of this study is therefore to assess the progression of adenomyosis and associated risk factors using transvaginal ultrasound. The study is prospective and retrospective observational.

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
OTHER

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to 55 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients aged between 18 and 55 years; * Presence of at least two direct and indirect signs according to the MUSA classification * Obtaining informed consent

Exclusion criteria

* Patients undergoing hysterectomy; * Virgo patients; * Patients reporting intolerance to transvaginal ultrasound; * Gynaecological oncology; * Recent pregnancy or childbirth (within 6 months)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Progression of adenomyosisAt 12, 24, 36 and 48 monthsRisk of progression of adenomyosis and the risk factors associated with progression in patients with ultrasound diagnosis of adenomyosis

Countries

Italy

Contacts

Primary ContactPaolo Casadio, MD
paolo.casadio@aosp.bo.it+390512144411

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026