Skip to content

Comparing Visual Outcomes in Matched Patients Receiving a Low Cylinder Power Toric IOL or a Non-toric IOL

Comparing Visual Outcomes in Matched Patients Receiving a Low Cylinder Power Toric IOL or a Non-toric IOL

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06717607
Enrollment
43
Registered
2024-12-05
Start date
2022-08-20
Completion date
2024-08-30
Last updated
2026-06-15

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cataract and IOL Surgery

Keywords

Toric IOL

Brief summary

The purpose of the study is to determine if visual function is improved with implantation of a low-cylinder toric intraocular lens, relative to a non-toric intraocular lens.

Detailed description

The Clareon(R) T2 IOL and the Clareon (R) non-toric IOL will be randomly implanted in subjects determined to be appropriate for the T2 IOL. Visual acuity, low contrast acuity and contrast sensitivity will be measured 3 months postoperatively.

Interventions

DEVICElow cylinder toric IOL

Clareon T2 toric IOL implantation

Clareon non-toric IOL

Sponsors

Ifocus Oyeklinikk
Lead SponsorNETWORK
Alcon Research
CollaboratorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
40 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* candidate for cataract surgery, suitable for implantation with a low cylinder toric IOL

Exclusion criteria

* pathology that would confound outcomes, previous ocular surgery

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
UDVA3 monthsUncorrected distance visual acuty in logMAR

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Manifest Refractive Cylinder3 monthsManifest refractive cylinder, in diopters
Percentage of Eyes With <= 0.25 D of Refractive Cylinder3 monthsthe percentage of eyes with \<= 0.25 D of postoperative refractive cylinder
Percentage of Eyes With <= 0.50 D of Refractive Cylinder3 monthsThe percentage of eyes with \<= 0.50 D of refractive cylinder
Corrected Distance Visual Acuity3 monthsCorrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), logMAR
Mesopic Contrast Sensitivity3 monthsMesopic log contrast sensitivity by spatial frequency - cycles per degree (CPD), using the Clinical Trial Suite (CTS) from M\&S Technologies (Niles, IL, 129 USA)
Photopic Contrast Sensitivity3 monthsPhotopic log contrast sensitivity by spatial frequency - cycles per degree (CPD), using the Clinical Trial Suite (CTS) from M\&S Technologies (Niles, IL, 129 USA)
Low Contrast Visual Acuity3 monthsLow contrast visual acuity (VA), logMAR, 10% contrast, using the Clinical Trial Suite (CTS) from M\&S Technologies (Niles, IL, 129 USA)
Mean Refraction, Spherical Equivalent (MRSE)3 monthsMean refraction, spherical equivalent (MRSE), in diopters

Countries

Norway

Contacts

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORKjell Gunnar Gundersen, MD, PhD

Ifocus Oyeklinikk

Baseline characteristics

Characteristic
Age, Continuous74 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected0 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Norway
18 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
24 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
12 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 250 / 18
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 250 / 18
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 250 / 18

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Jun 16, 2026