Skip to content

Trilaciclib Combing Chemotherapy in the Neoadjuvant Treatment of Osteosarcoma

A Prospective Randomized Phase Ⅱ Study of Trilaciclib Combing Chemotherapy in the Neoadjuvant Treatment of Osteosarcoma

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06714383
Enrollment
50
Registered
2024-12-03
Start date
2024-11-13
Completion date
2025-11-30
Last updated
2024-12-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Osteosarcoma

Brief summary

To evaluate the clinical application value in bone marrow protection of Trilaciclib in the neoadjuvant treatment of stage II/III classic osteosarcoma in combination with pirarubicin and lobaplatin.

Detailed description

Classic osteosarcoma is the most common primary bone malignancy. At present, osteosarcoma is usually treated with preoperative chemotherapy, surgical operation and postoperative chemotherapy. Treatment with preoperative chemotherapy is also known as neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy has brought benefits to patients, but safety concerns are inevitable. Myelosuppression is a major factor affecting the compliance of patients treated by chemotherapy. Patients with chemotherapy-induced myelosuppression(CIM) have higher rates of infection, sepsis, bleeding, and fatigue, resulting in hospitalization, hematopoietic growth factor support, blood transfusions (red blood cells and/or platelets) and even death. In addition, CIM often leads to dose reduction and delayed administration, which limits the therapeutic dose intensity and therefore affects the anti-tumor efficacy of chemotherapy. Currently, there are no approved treatments in osteosarcoma to prevent chemotherapy-induced cell damage. Although some treatments may help to address CIM when it occurs such as blood transfusions and growth factors, these treatments are pedigree specific, being used after hematopoietic stem progenitor cells damage and could bring additional toxicity. Trilaciclib is a highly effective, selective and temporarily reversible inhibitor of CDK4/6. The proliferation of bone marrow hematopoietic stem cells depends on CDK4/6 activity. Bone marrow hematopoietic stem cells are blocked in the G1 phase of the cell cycle after exposure to Trilaciclib before chemotherapy is given. Therefore, this study is conducted to evaluate the clinical application value in bone marrow protection of Trilaciclib in the neoadjuvant treatment of stage II/III classic osteosarcoma in combination with pirarubicin and lobaplatin.

Interventions

DRUGTrilaciclib

Trilaciclib: 240mg/m2, IV, within 4 hours before each chemotherapy agent infused.

Pirarubicin: 60 mg/m2,IV,d1-2

LobaplLatin: 40 mg/m2,,IV,d1

Sponsors

Peking University People's Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
14 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Written informed consent signed; 2. Classic osteosarcoma confirmed by histopathology (high grade); 3. Newly diagnosed stage Ⅱ-Ⅲ based on Enneking staging criteria; 4. Planned to receive neoadjuvant chemotherapy; 5. Measurable disease on CT by RECIST 1.1. 6. No antitumor system therapy received; 7. ECOG 0-1 8. Adequate organ function. 9. Females of childbearing potential as well as males and their partners must agree to use an effective form of contraception during the study and for 6 months following the last dose of study medication.

Exclusion criteria

1. History of malignancies of other type; 2. Allergic to study agent; 3. History of psychotropic substance abuse, alcohol or drug use; 4. The researchers considered inappropriate to join the study of any cause.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Incidence of grade 3/4 neutropeniaup to 30 daysIncidence of grade 3/4 neutropenia up to 30 days

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Incidence of grade 3/4 thrombocytopeniaup to 30 daysIncidence of grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia up to 30 days
Incidence of grade 3 or 4 anemiaup to 30 daysIncidence of grade 3 or 4 anemia up to 30 days
Incidence of febrile neutropeniaup to 30 daysIncidence of febrile neutropenia up to 30 days
Usage of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF)up to 30 daysUtilization rate of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) up to 30 days
Usage of Thrombopoietin (TPO)up to 30 daysUtilization rate of Thrombopoietin (TPO) up to 30 days
Usage of Erythropoietin (ESA)up to 30 daysUtilization rate of Erythropoietin (ESA) up to 30 days
Duration of grade 3/4 neutropeniaup to 30 daysDuration of grade 3/4 neutropenia up to 30 days
Incidence of red blood cell transfusionup to 30 daysIncidence of red blood cell transfusion up to 30 days
Usage of ferraliaup to 30 daysUtilization rate of ferralia up to 30 days
chemotherapy dose reduction of any causeup to 30 dayschemotherapy dose reduction rate of any cause up to 30 days
AE adverse event adverse event adverse eventup to 30 daysadverse event
SAEup to 30 daysserious adverse event serious adverse event serious adverse event Serious Adverse Event
Termination of treatment caused by AE/SAEup to 30 daysTermination of treatment rate caused by AE/SAE
Incidence of platelet transfusionup to 30 daysIncidence of platelet transfusion up to 30 days

Countries

China

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026