Bone Healing, Implant Stability
Conditions
Brief summary
Two different implants will be used in post-extraction sockets and ISQ will be recorded monthly from insertion moment to 12 months of follow up to understand if ISQ can be affected by implant macro design
Interventions
DIAGNOSTIC_TESTImplant stability quotient
Screw a smart peg into the implant and record the values from a dedicated device
Sponsors
University of Rome Tor Vergata
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 99 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes
Inclusion criteria
* Patients (at least 18 years old) presenting with failing tooth. * no recession of gingival contour of tooth to be extracted * no periodontal bone loss of neighboring teeth * no implants in neighboring teeth * class I extraction socket (intact buccal wall) * atraumatic extraction of the tooth with intact socket walls remaining.
Exclusion criteria
* deep bite (severe II class) * systemic disease (diabetes, osteoporosis) * heavy smokers (more than 10 cigarettes/day)
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| IMPLANT STABILITY QUOTIENT | Monthly from T0 (implant insertion) to T12 (12 months after implant placement) | Values of risonance of implants taken by means of a dedicated device that translate the risonance of each implant into a number (0-99). |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Insertion torque | At implant placement | Mechanical resistance of the bone at implant placement |
Countries
Italy
Contacts
Primary ContactPaolo Carosi, PhD
Outcome results
None listed