Skip to content

Development of Bone-vestibular Evoked Myogenic Potential

Development of Bone-vestibular Evoked Myogenic Potential

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06711653
Enrollment
20
Registered
2024-12-02
Start date
2022-11-07
Completion date
2023-05-01
Last updated
2024-12-02

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Noise, Vestibular Disorder

Keywords

bone conduction, masking, noise, random, vestibular evoked myogenic potentials

Brief summary

This study aims to evaluate the effects of different masking conditions on cervical vestibular evoked myogenic potential (cVEMP) responses. Vertical-axis vibrations (VAVs) of 500-Hz short-tone bursts (STB500) and 750-Hz short-tone bursts (STB750) were used to elicit cVEMP responses. These stimuli were delivered through a Mini-Shaker placed at the vertex (Cz) under three masking conditions: no masking (NOM), speech noise masking (SNM), and random interstimulus-interval tone bursts (rISITB). The study focused on testing protocols that can potentially improve unilateral VEMP testing and explore its clinical applicability.

Detailed description

Participants and Ethics: The study recruited 20 healthy adults (10 males and 10 females, aged 20-37 years), all of whom had normal otoscopic findings and no history of hearing issues. Ethical approval was obtained, and all participants provided informed consent. Bone Conduction Vibrations (BCV): Bone-conducted vibrations were generated using a SmartEP system and delivered via a Mini-Shaker transducer. Stimuli included 500 Hz and 750 Hz short-tone bursts (STB500 and STB750), calibrated to appropriate levels, with specific rise, plateau, and fall times. Masking Conditions: Masking sounds included speech noise (250-1000 Hz, calibrated at 100 dB SPL) and random interstimulus-interval tone bursts (rISITB, 500 Hz, 100 dB SPL). Testing Procedure: Vertical-axis BCV was delivered to the vertex (Cz) while participants maintained steady neck muscle tension in specified head positions. Electrodes were placed using a standard montage for cVEMP recording. Each side was tested under three masking conditions (NOM, SNM, rISITB) with a 24-hour interval between tests. Responses were recorded bilaterally and repeated for reproducibility. Study Focus: The study investigates the effects of different masking conditions on response characteristics, including latencies, amplitudes, and asymmetry ratios. The aim is to refine VEMP testing protocols, explore its potential for unilateral testing, and evaluate its applicability for specific vestibular organ assessments.

Interventions

DIAGNOSTIC_TESTVestibular evoke myogenic potential

routine Vestibular test

Sponsors

Taipei City Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER_GOV

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
BASIC_SCIENCE
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
20 Years to 40 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* 20y-40y adult

Exclusion criteria

* Having history of hearing loss or dizziness * failed hearing screening test * Having history of head or neck surgery

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Vemp response rateup to 24 weeksThis study investigates VEMP response rates under different frequencies (500 Hz, 750 Hz) and masking conditions (no masking, speech noise, random tone bursts) to evaluate the effects of masking on VEMP responses.

Countries

Taiwan

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026