Skip to content

Tele-assessment of the Performance Tests in Patients With Knee Osteoarthritis

Reliability of Tele-assessment of the Performance Tests in Patients With Knee Osteoarthritis

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06711445
Acronym
Teleassessment
Enrollment
60
Registered
2024-12-02
Start date
2020-11-15
Completion date
2021-11-10
Last updated
2024-12-02

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Knee Arthritis Osteoarthritis, Performance Measures, Tele-assessment, Telerehabilitation

Keywords

Knee osteoarthritis, reliability, single leg stance test, tele-assessment, thirty second chair stand test, timed up and go test

Brief summary

The COVID-19 pandemic widely affected delivery mode of healthcare services. While fewer number of patients were allowed to attend face-to-face rehabilitation sessions, some services were totally unavailable due to the safety measures. The COVID-19 crisis highlighted the value and accelerated the improvement of tele-assessment and tele-rehabilitation applications. Consequently, reliable remote assessment approaches were required to evaluate the effectiveness of the remote programs. While tests such as TUG, SLS, and 30CST are valid and reliable for clinical use in patients with knee OA, their psychometric properties are yet to be investigated when used as tele-assessment tests. Therefore, this study aimed to examine the intra- and inter-rater reliability of the TUG, SLS, and 30CST as remote tests in patients with knee OA.

Detailed description

As the main cause of disability and loss of function in lower limb in middle-aged to elderly individuals , knee osteoarthritis (OA) is the most common OA worldwide and its prevalence increases with age and obesity . Among non-pharmacological methods, which are the first line of knee OA treatment , physical therapy is commonly prescribed to alleviate pain and improve physical function. However, not all patients with knee OA have access to face-to-face rehabilitation sessions under direct supervision of physicians or physiotherapists. Thanks to telemedicine, patients' access to real-time communication with health professionals has been considerably facilitated in recent years. Detailed and comprehensive assessment is a fundamental factor for an effective rehabilitation program. Different assessment tools are available to assess the effectiveness of rehabilitation in patients with knee OA. To assess physical performance, practical tests, which are time- and space-effective, such as Timed Up and Go Test (TUG), Thirty Second Chair Stand Test (30CST), and Single Leg Stance Test (SLS) are commonly used in patients with knee OA .COVID-19 crisis highlighted the value and accelerated the improvement of tele-assessment and tele-rehabilitation applications. Consequently, reliable remote assessment approaches were required to evaluate the effectiveness of the remote programs.

Interventions

The participants were evaluated in two settings on different days (24-48 h apart): (i) in clinical settings (face-to-face) and (ii) at home via 'WhatsApp' phone application (both asynchronized and synchronized tele-assessment). The evaluations steps were as follows: 1. Face-to-face/ Clinic assessment: Rater 1 completed all clinical assessments. 2. Synchronized tele-assessment: Rater 1 repeated the same evaluations via video calls to the patients (these were recorded to be used in step 3). 3. Asynchronized tele-assessment: Rater 2 evaluated the recordings of the remote evaluations (made in step 2). 4. Retest of synchronized tele-assessment: Rater 1 evaluated patients via video calls (these were recorded to be used in step 5). 5. Retest of asynchronized tele-assessment: Rater 2 evaluated the recordings of the remote evaluations (made in step 4).

Sponsors

Selcuk University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
OTHER
Time perspective
CROSS_SECTIONAL

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
30 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Grade 2 and 3 knee OA on the Kellgren and Lawrence (K/L) scale, * radiologically confirmed * pain in the knee, * willingness to join the study

Exclusion criteria

* Grade 0, 1 and 4 knee OA on the K/L scale, * central or peripheral nervous system involvement, * previous knee surgery within the past six months, * neurological or musculoskeletal disorders that would limit their performance on the tests, * history of systemic arthritic conditions

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Timed up and go test (TUG)2 daysThe TUG is a simple practical test that measures the time an individual needs to stand up from a standard chair, walk 3 meters at normal speed, turn around, walk back to the chair, and sit down. Our participants performed 3 trials and their best score (in seconds) was recorded as the primary outcome. Participants had at least 4 minutes of seated rest intervals between the trials. Before and after each test, fatigue and dyspnea (using Borg scale), and hemodynamic (heart rate and SpO2) were evaluated.
Single Leg Stance Test (SLS)2 daysThe participants used their leg with arthritic knee (in cases of unilateral involvement) or the more symptomatic leg (in cases of bilateral involvement) as the stance limb. The test was terminated when the free leg/foot touched the ground, or if excessive trunk/upper body movements (e.g., swinging arms) were observed. Participants were allowed to repeat the test if they scored less than10 seconds during the first attempt. If needed, participants could rest between the trials for recovery. Before and after each test, fatigue and dyspnea (using Borg scale), and hemodynamics (heart rate and SpO2) were evaluated.
Thirty second chair stand test (30 CST)2 daysThe 30 CST checks the number of repetitions in 30 seconds that an individual can stand up from a standard chair (not using the arms/hands, feet flat on the ground) and sit back again. Our test chair was 43 cm in height and had no armrest. The participants performed 3 trials and their best score was recorded as the test result. If needed, they were allowed to rest (\>5 min) between the trials for recovery. Before and after each test, fatigue and dyspnea (using Borg scale), and hemodynamics (heart rate and SpO2) were evaluated.

Countries

Turkey (Türkiye)

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026