Skip to content

Target-directed Management of Cerebral Oxygenation in Patients After Receiving ECPR

Efficacy and Safety of Target-directed Management of Cerebral Oxygenation in Patients Undergoing Extracorporeal Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation: A Multicenter, Pragmatic, Randomized, Controlled Clinical Trial

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06711016
Acronym
TDMCO-ECPR
Enrollment
654
Registered
2024-12-02
Start date
2025-04-22
Completion date
2028-07-30
Last updated
2026-06-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cardiac Arrest

Keywords

Multimodality Neuromonitoring, ECPR, Out-of-hospital Caridac arrest, In-Hospital Cardiac Arrest

Brief summary

Neurological injury remains an important cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with ECPR. At present, the results of three prospective randomized controlled studies on ECPR are inconsistent, and it is inconclusive whether ECPR can improve the neurological outcomes of patients with refractory cardiac arrest. Several study found that extracorporeal membrane oxygenation nonsurvivors can lead toacute brain injury.Further research with a systematic neurologic monitoring is necessary to define the timing of acute brain injury in patients with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.Moreover, brain injury that occurs during extracorporeal membrane oxygenation therapy is not easy to detect in time because of the use of analgesics, sedatives, and muscle relaxants. Surprisingly, little attention has been paid to the role of cerebral perfusion and oxygenation. Moreover,the features of cerebrovascular pathophysiology and optimal management strategies are still vague. Therefore multimodal neuromonitoring may be a valuable tool for detecting brain injury in patients with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation and providing early intervention guidance. Multimodal neuromonitoring, integrating tools such as near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS), transcranial Doppler, and continuous electroencephalography, may enable early detection of brain injury and guide targeted interventions. Hypothesis: Multimodal neuromonitoring combined with a standard care management will increase the proportion of patients achieving survival with favorable neurological outcome (Cerebral Performance Category \[CPC\] 1-2) at 30 days compared with standard care without protocolized neuromonitoring. Primary Objective: To test whether a multimodal neuromonitoring strategy improves 30-day survival with favorable neurological outcome (CPC 1-2) in adult patients with refractory cardiac arrest treated with ECPR.

Interventions

OTHERif rSO2 < 58%

Use Vasoactive drugs(MAP 65-95mmHg); Use Cardiotonic agents(CO 3.0-4.5L/min); Increase ECMO blood flow rate(Vm 55-85cm/s); Osmotic dehydration therapy(Na+ 140-150mmol/l;Osmotic pressure 280-320m0sm/(kg·H₂O);ONSD\<5.5mm); Antiepileptic therapy(EEG shows no seizures); Optimize sedation and analgesia; Target Temperature Management

OTHERif rSO2 58%-68%

Optimize ECMO blood flow rate( Vm 55-85cm/s); Osmotic dehydration therapy(Na+ 140-150mmol/l;Osmotic pressure 280-320m0sm/(kg·H₂O);ONSD\<5.5mm); Optimize sedation and analgesia; Antiepileptic therapy(EEG shows no seizures); Target Temperature Management

OTHERrSO2>68%

Antihypertensive therapy(MAP ≥65mmHg); Inhibiting myocardial contractility and controls ventricular rate(CO 2.5-3.0 L/min); Decrease ECMO blood flow rate(Vm 55-85cm/s); Osmotic dehydration therapy(Na+ 140-150mmol/l;Osmotic pressure 280-320m0sm/(kg·H₂O); Antiepileptic therapy(EEG shows no seizures); Optimize sedation and analgesia; Target Temperature Management

OTHERStandard monitoring based on ECPR, along with continuous cerebral oxygenation monitoring (blinded to investigators, with no clinical interventions according to the results).

Clinical interventions are strictly guided by the 2023 American Heart Association (AHA) Guidelines for Advanced Cardiovascular Life Support in Adults (hereinafter referred to as the 2023 AHA Guidelines), including regulating ECMO blood flow, the dose of vasoactive drugs (MAP ≥65 mmHg), mechanical ventilation parameters (SaO₂ 94-98%, PaCO₂ 35-45 mmHg), sedation and analgesia plans. Concurrently, staged target temperature management is implemented, involving maintaining the core temperature 32- 37.5°C within 24 hours, initiating controlled rewarming at a rate of ≤0.1°C/h after 24 hours, and continuing to prevent fever (core temperature ≤37.5°C) within 72 hours.

OTHERStandard monitoring based on ECPR

Clinical interventions are strictly guided by the 2023 American Heart Association (AHA) Guidelines for Advanced Cardiovascular Life Support in Adults (hereinafter referred to as the 2023 AHA Guidelines), including regulating ECMO blood flow, the dose of vasoactive drugs (MAP ≥65 mmHg), mechanical ventilation parameters (SaO₂ 94-98%, PaCO₂ 35-45 mmHg), sedation and analgesia plans. Concurrently, staged target temperature management is implemented, involving maintaining the core temperature 32- 37.5°C within 24 hours, initiating controlled rewarming at a rate of ≤0.1°C/h after 24 hours, and continuing to prevent fever (core temperature ≤37.5°C) within 72 hours.

Sponsors

Qilu Hospital of Shandong University
Lead SponsorOTHER
China-Japan Friendship Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University
CollaboratorOTHER
Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University
CollaboratorOTHER
Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University
CollaboratorOTHER
Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Hunan Provincial People's Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Jiangsu Provincial People's Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University
CollaboratorOTHER
Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University
CollaboratorOTHER
Beijing Anzhen Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
The Second Hospital University of South China
CollaboratorOTHER
The Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University
CollaboratorOTHER
Heze Municipal Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Shenzhen People's Hospital, The Second Medical College of Jinan University
CollaboratorOTHER
Liaocheng People's Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Jining First People's Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Weifang People's Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
The First People's Hospital of Lianyungang
CollaboratorOTHER
Huai'an First People's Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
SEQUENTIAL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Intervention model description

The control group: Standard monitoring based on ECPR, along with continuous cerebral oxygenation monitoring (blinded to investigators, with no clinical interventions). Clinical interventions are strictly guided by the 2023 American Heart Association (AHA) Guidelines for Advanced Cardiovascular Life Support in Adults. including regulating ECMO blood flow, the dose of vasoactive drugs , mechanical ventilation parameters, sedation and analgesia plans. The experimental group:For patients with refractory cardiac arrest undergoing ECPR, continuous cerebral oxygenation monitoring was used. Guided by the target-directed management strategies targeting cerebral oxygenation, interventions were dynamically adjusted. These adjustments included modifying ECMO blood flow rates, titrating vasoactive drug dosages, optimizing mechanical ventilation parameters, administering osmotic dehydration therapy, using antiepileptic drugs, and implementing targeted temperature management.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. 18-75 years old 2. Witnessed in-hospital or out-of-hospital cardiac arrest 3. Patients who did not achieve return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) after 15 minutes of conventional cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), or whose ROSC cannot be maintained, and who received ECPR 4. Time from cardiac arrest to initiation of CPR \< 10 minutes 5. The cause of cardiac arrest is expected to be reversible (e.g., hypothermia, acute myocardial infarction/myocardial ischemia, malignant arrhythmia, pulmonary embolism, electrolyte abnormalities, hypoxia, anaphylactic shock, hemorrhage/hypovolemia, drug poisoning, electric shock, etc.)

Exclusion criteria

1. Aortic dissection 2. Participants with active gastrointestinal bleeding or other conditions with contraindications to anticoagulation 3. Pregnancy 4. Severe trauma 5. Cerebral Performance Category (CPC) score \> 2 before cardiac arrest, or acute cerebrovascular disease (e.g., suspected or confirmed acute stroke, subarachnoid hemorrhage, etc.) 6. Terminal diseases, such as malignant tumors, end-stage liver and kidney diseases, severe heart failure (NYHA class III or IV), severe COPD (GOLD class III or IV), etc. 7. Transfer time from cardiac arrest to extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) \> 90 minutes 8. Previous history of bilateral femoral artery bypass grafting or artificial vascular replacement, unsuitable for ECMO catheterization

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Favorable neurological outcome (CPC scale 1-2) at 30 days30 daysCerebral Performance Category (CPC) score will be performed to evaluate the neurological status. A CPC score of 1 or 2 indicates a favorable neurological status.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Survival to 30 days and 90 days;30 days and 90 daysDoes multimodal neurological monitoring Strategy improve the survival rates of 30 days and 90 days after cardiac arrest
Favorable neurological outcome (CPC 1-2) at 90 days;90 daysCerebral Performance Category (CPC) score will be performed to evaluate the neurological status. A CPC score of 1 or 2 indicates a favorable neurological status
Duration of mechanical ventilation1 yearIs there a difference in the duration of mechanical ventilation between treatment groups
Length of stay at the ICU1 yearIs there a difference in length of stay at the ICU between the treatment groups
Length of stay at the hospital1 yearIs there a difference in length of stay at the hospital between the treatment groups
Difference in NSE level between treatment groups3 daysIs there a difference in nerve damage Markers such as NSE at ROSC 24h, 48h, 72h between the treatment groups
ECMO-related complication rates such as hemorrhage, infarction, lower limb ischemic necrosis, etc.1 yearIs there a difference in ECMO-related complication between the treatment groups
ECMO duration1 yearIs there a difference in the duration of ECMO between treatment groups

Countries

China

Contacts

CONTACTXianfei Ji, MD. PhD
qlyyjxf@163.com0086-531-82165072
CONTACTFeng Xu, MD. PhD
xufengsdu@126.com86-0531-82165675
STUDY_CHAIRYuguo Chen, MD. PhD

Qilu Hospital of Shandong University

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Jun 9, 2026