Skip to content

Kinesiotaping in Carpal Tunnel Syndrome

Effects of Kinesiotaping in Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Treatment: a Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06710041
Enrollment
60
Registered
2024-11-29
Start date
2020-07-01
Completion date
2022-02-28
Last updated
2024-11-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Carpal Tunnel Syndrome (CTS)

Keywords

carpal tunnel syndrome, Kinesiotaping, Sham taping

Brief summary

Objective: Kinesiotaping (KT) is a relatively new technique, which reduces the pressure on the median nerve by extending the transverse carpal ligament. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of KT on Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) in a randomized, placebo-controlled manner. Methods: Patients were randomly divided into three groups: Group 1 (KT plus tendon and nerve gliding exercises), Group 2 (sham-taping plus exercises) and Group 3 (exercises alone, control group). KT was applied 3 times with 5-day intervals throughout the study, with neural technique for median and ulnar nerves and area correction technique for carpal tunnel releasing. In the placebo group kinesiotapes were applied without stretching and proper position. Hand grip strength, VAS, Boston Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Questionnaire (BCTQ), and Short Form-12 (SF-12) were measured as outcome parameters at the first visit, 3rd and 6th week.

Interventions

DEVICEKinesiotape

Kinesiotape, when applied with a specific method and tension, significantly reduces the pressure on the median nerve by extending the transverse carpal ligament. It regulates edema under the skin and improves lymphatic and blood circulation. It reduces muscle spasms, eases the movement of tendons and fascia, and reduces pain through neurological suppression

OTHERExercise

Tendon and nerve gliding exercise

DEVICEsham taping

In the sham taping group, kinesiotape was applied with two I bands without stretching and without having the proper position. This group was considered as the placebo group.

Sponsors

Karadeniz Technical University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* clicical diagnosis of mild and moderate CTS * having the CTS symptoms for at least 6 weeks

Exclusion criteria

* electrophysiological diagnosis of severe CTS, * thenar atrophy, * local corticosteroid injection or KT application or physical therapy treatment for CTS within the last 3 months, * patients with secondary metabolic causes for CTS (such as diabetes mellitus, pregnancy, rheumatoid arthritis, sarcoidosis, thyroid disease), * patients with other conditions that may cause neck and arm pain (cervical disc hernia, arthritis, epicondylitis, rotator cuff syndrome), * a history of fracture in the wrist, * previous CTS surgery.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
pain levelFrom enrollment to the end of treatment at 3 weekspain level was assessed using visual analog scale.The minimum and maximum values were 0 and 10, and higher scores mean a better outcome.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Boston Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Questionnaire (BCTQ)From enrollment to the end of treatment at 6 weeksThe BCTQ is a disease specific questionnaire to evaluate the symptom severity and functional capacity. High scores indicate increased symtom severity and low functional capacity

Countries

Turkey (Türkiye)

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026