Skip to content

Switch of AndroidAPS to Commercially Available AID Systems

Switch of Open-source Automated Insulin Delivery System - AndroidAPS to Commercially Available AID Systems in Type 1 Diabetes: the Extension of the CODIAC Study

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06709729
Enrollment
41
Registered
2024-11-29
Start date
2020-12-01
Completion date
2024-12-31
Last updated
2024-11-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1

Keywords

Insulin Pump, Closed-loop hybrid system, Continuous Glucose Monitoring, Automated Insulin Delivery

Brief summary

The aim of the study was to investigate the switch between open-source automated insulin delivery system (OS-AID) - AndroidAPS (AAPS) and commercially available AID systems - Control-IQ (CIQ) and MiniMed 780G (780G) in extended follow-up study.

Interventions

DEVICEInsulin pump with closed-loop system

Device: Usage of Insulin pump t:slim X2 with Control-IQ technology or MiniMed 780G with Smartguard technology in previous users of AndroidAPS

Sponsors

General University Hospital, Prague
CollaboratorOTHER
Charles University, Czech Republic
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SEQUENTIAL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* type 1 diabetes diagnosed \>2 years * ≥ 18 years old * written informed consent prior to starting study related activity * previous user of AndroidAPS at least for 3 months

Exclusion criteria

* nonadherence to the current treatment regimen * lactation * pregnancy * intending to become pregnant during study * concomitant therapy influencing glucose metabolism

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of time in target ranges14 weeks3.9-10.0 mmol/L \[70-180 mg/dL\]

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of time in hyperglycemic range14 weeks\>10,0 mmol/L \[180 mg/dL\] and \>13,9 mmol/L \[250 mg/dL\]
Percentage of time in tight range14 weeks3.9 mmol/L-7.8 mmol/l \[70 mg/dL - 140 mg/dL\]
Changes in glycemic variability14 weeksExpressed as the coefficient of variation
Icidence of severe hypoglycaemia14 weeksRequiring third-party assistance to treat
Percentage of time in hypoglycemic range14 weeks\<3.9 mmol/L \[70 mg/dL\] and \<3.0 mmol/L \[54 mg/dL\]
Hypoglycemia Attitudes and Behavior Scale (HABS)14 weeksThis validated questionnaire contains in total 14 questions that highlights two critical dimensions of hypoglycemia related concerns (anxiety and avoidance) and one positive dimension (confidence). 14 items use Likert scales from 1 to 5, total score from 14 to 70, the higher total score means worse outcome.
Diabetec distress as assessed by validated questionnaire14 weeksThe DDS17 yields a total diabetes distress score plus 4 subscale scores, each addressing a different kind of distress - Emotional Burden, Physician Distress, Regimen Distress, Interpersonal Distress. Scores in total and each subscales range between 1-21, higher scores denote higher distress.
The 5-item World Health Organization well-being index as assessed by validated questionnaire14 weeksThis questionnaire contains in total 5 questions. Scores in total range between 0-25, higher scores denote higher quality of life.
Changes in glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c)14 weeksDifferences between HbA1c values in the initial period and after follow-up

Countries

Czechia

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026