Skip to content

Tissue Repair Gel in Venous Leg Ulcers in AU/US

A Phase 3 Randomized, Parallel Group, Double-Blind Study to Evaluate the Efficacy, Tolerability, and Safety of TR987® 0.1% Gel Versus Standard of Care in the Treatment of Chronic Venous Insufficiency Leg Ulcers (VLU)

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06707103
Acronym
TRIVIA
Enrollment
312
Registered
2024-11-27
Start date
2025-04-30
Completion date
2027-02-28
Last updated
2025-04-02

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Non-healing Wound, Venous Insufficiency of Leg, Venous Leg Ulcer, Venous Stasis, Venous Stasis Ulcer, Venous Ulcer, Wound, Wound Heal

Keywords

Tissue Repair, Glucoprime, TR Therapeutics, Debridement, VLU

Brief summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if TR987 0.1% gel + Standard of Care works better than Standard of Care alone to treat Venous Leg Ulcers (VLUs). It will also provide additional information about the safety of drug TR987 0.1% gel.

Detailed description

This is an outpatient, randomized, parallel- group, double-blind, multicenter, 16-week study with 2 treatment arms: TR987 0.1% gel + Standard of Care and Standard of Care alone in participants who have a non-healing Venous Leg Ulcer (VLU). The primary objective is to assess the proportion of participants with Complete Closure of the target ulcer at or before the Week-16 end of treatment (EOT) visit. Secondary endpoints include: * Proportion of participants with Complete Closure of the target ulcer at or before the Week 16 visit AND for whom the ulcer remains closed at the 3-Month Follow-Up visit after such closure (a composite endpoint). * Change from baseline in participant's perception of pain level at 12 weeks. * Percent change from baseline in the target ulcer area at 12 and 16 weeks. In the event of Complete Closure before these time points, the target ulcer area will be deemed to be zero at those time points for purposes of calculation of this endpoint. * Proportion of participants with Complete Closure of the target ulcer at or before the Week 12 treatment visit. * Proportion of participants with any significant reduction in pain at or before 12 weeks. There are also some supplementary and safety endpoints.

Interventions

6mg topical gel for application plus Standard of Care (wound cleansing/dressings and compression bandaging)

OTHERStandard of care

Standard of Care (wound cleansing/dressings and compression bandaging)

Sponsors

TR Therapeutics
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

Particpants will be randomized to either TR987 1% gel + Standard of Care and Standard of Care alone. Sponsor, particpant, and Investigator/Outcomes Assessor will be masked throughout the treatment period.

Intervention model description

This is an outpatient, randomized, parallel- group, double-blind, multicenter, 16-week study with 2 treatment arms: TR987 0.1% gel + Standard of Care and Standard of Care alone in participants who have a non-healing Venous Leg Ulcer (VLU).

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Adults 18 years and older * Venous insufficiency has been clinically diagnosed clinically and medically confirmed. * Females who are neither pregnant nor breastfeeding and if of child-bearing potential are on an acceptable method of birth control. * The Venous Ulcer should be between 2 cm2 and 12 cm2 at randomization. * Target ulcer age must be ≥ 4 weeks at Screening. * Participants must have adequate arterial flow as confirmed by ABI/TBI, TB, SPP, TCPo2, or Duplex Doppler. * Body mass index (BMI) ≤ 50 kg/m2. * HbA1C ≤12%.

Exclusion criteria

* Target ulcer has been treated with prohibited medications or therapies. * History of radiation at the target ulcer site. * Target ulcer decreases in area by 30% or more during screening period. * History of osteomyelitis at the target ulcer within 6 months of screening. * History of cancer in the preceding 5 years (except as noted in the protocol). * Participants considered nutritionally deficient.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Proportion of participants with Complete Closure of the target ulcer at or before the Week-16 end of treatment (EOT) visit.16 weeksPatient count

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Proportion of participants with Complete Closure of the target ulcer at or before the Week 16 visit AND for whom the ulcer remains closed at the 3-Month Follow-Up visit after such closure (a composite endpoint).16 weeksPatient count
Change from baseline in participant's perception of pain level at 12 weeks.12 weeksPain to be measured on a 10 point numeric rating scale
Percent change from baseline in the target ulcer area at 12 and 16 weeks. In the event of Complete Closure before these time points, the target ulcer area will be deemed to be zero at those time points for purposes of calculation of this endpoint.12 and 16 weeksMeasure the are of the wound in cm2 at baseline and at 12 and 16 weeks and calculate the percentage change
Proportion of participants with Complete Closure of the target ulcer at or before the Week 12 treatment visit.12 weeksCount the number of patients with complete closure and divide by the total number of patients
Proportion of participants with any significant reduction in pain at or before 12 weeks.12 weeksCount the number of patients with any significant reduction in pain and divide by the total number of patients

Countries

Australia, United States

Contacts

Primary ContactAnhthu Nguyen Vice President, Global Clinical Operations
anhthu.nguyen@trtherapeutics.com(+61) 280 034 554

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026