Endocrine, Metabolic, Inflammatory Biomarkers to Identify Highgrade Dysplasia/invasive Carcinoma in Patients with IPMN of the Pancreas

Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Neoplasm of Pancreas, Pancreatic Cyst

ipmn, intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm of the pancreas, Pancreatic Cysts

Under the hypotheses that a more accurate patients selection could limit the problem of overtreatment and that benign intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMN) have a distinguishable Endocrine/Metabolic/Inflammatory (EMI) profile from those with high-grade disease/invasive carcinoma, this study has three specific aims. The first aim is to evaluate and confirm the accuracy of the updated versions of International and European guidelines for the management of IPMN and it will be addressed by retrospectively applying the criteria included in the two guidelines on 350 patients with resected IPMN in order to determine the most accurate criteria to identify High Grade Dysplasia(HGD)/Invasive Carcinoma (IC). The second aim is to identify pre-operative biological and/or radiological/endosonographic biomarker(s) able to distinguish low- versus high-risk IPMN for cancer progression in a prospective study by enrolling a cohort of 186 (of which 145 surgically-resected) patients. The third aim is to prospectively validate biological and/or radiological/endosonographic biomarker(s) (previously identified and optimized) on a new cohort of 50 patients with IPMN undergoing surgical resection.

Up to 40% of patients (pts) undergoing abdominal imaging harbor unsuspected pancreatic cysts, the majority of which intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMN). IPMNs are well-known precursors of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) without an established temporal window of progression. Current guidelines identify high-risk stigmata (HRS)/absolute criteria(AC) and worrisome features(WF)/relative criteria(RC) as indications for surgical resection of IPMN. Previous guideline criteria were found to be associated with high sensitivity but low specificity for malignancy, resulting in an overtreatment of benign IPMNs, a clinical relevant issue considering the high morbidity/mortality of pancreatectomy. Currently, there are no available hematic biomarkers in peripheral blood, be they DNA, RNA or protein-based, which can identify High Grade Dysplasia(HGD)/Invasive Carcinoma (IC). DNA-based molecular testing of pancreatic cyst fluid obtained during endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)/surgery have been developed and are used to identify advanced neoplasia, with good sensitivity/specificity, and therefore hypothetically, an IPMN HGD/IC-based biomarker could be more readily detected in cyst fluid or in portal blood. This strategy, however has a number of limitations: i) it is highly invasive and costly ii) poor quantity and quality of cyst fluid may lead to incorrect detection (false negatives in molecular testing) ; and iii) a lack of predictive potential of progression over time. New diagnostic tools based on samples of portal blood obtained during EUS or potentially peripheral samples (of new biomarkers) may overcome these limitations. PDAC has been associated with altered inflammatory and endocrine/metabolic profiles but limited data are available on IPMN and other precursors. Inflammation and malignant progression have become cardinal in cancer research. Tumor-associated neutrophils and cytokines, including TNFalpha and IL-1ß, have been associated with malignant progression also in IPMN. About 40-70% of patients with PDAC experience diabetes or alterations of glucose homeostasis. Diabetes-induced hyperglycemia, hyperinsulinemia, altered insulin-like growth factors production, chronic inflammation and metabolic syndrome have been associated with cancer . In a large cohort of resected IPMNs, preoperative diabetes was significantly associated with HGD/IC, and the risk of IC was highest in patients with recent-onset diabetes. Obesity is also a well-known risk factor for PDAC; proinflammatory cytokines, known as adipokines are released mainly from visceral adipose tissue stimulating aberrant angiogenesis. An association between visceral obesity and pancreatic fatty infiltration with poor survival was found in PDAC patients. In the setting of IPMN, in a very small cohort of resected patients, significantly higher BMI was associated to an increased rate of malignant IPMN. EUS, Computed tomography(CT) and magnetic resonance imaging(MRI) are of use in current clinical practice to study and monitor pancreatic diseases. They are all imaging techniques that allow to characterize pancreatic alterations and simultaneously detect endocrino-metabolic alterations (i.e.visceral obesity, liver steatosis, pancreatic fatty infiltration) that may be associated to pancreatic diseases. Current literature is still debating the superiority of radiological imaging (specifically MRI) or endoscopic ultrasound in identifying worrisome features/high risk stigmata and in correctly distinguishing benign/malignant IPMNs. Preliminary analysis performed in the context of this study, specifically in retrospective Cohort A, aimed at validating International and European guidelines, supports an important role for EUS in identifying risk of malignancy in IPMNs. In fact, 31/116 patients (26.7%) with WF at MRI were upstaged by EUS and the majority of these (77.4%) had malignancy at final pathology. Furthermore, EUS confirmed MRI findings in 87.5% of cases, including 72.4% of radiological WF. The association among obesity, diabetes, inflammation, alterations of specific endocrine/metabolic pathways and pancreatic cancer development from its precursors (IPMN) are more complex, and needs further investigations. The driving hypotheses of this study are that i) a more accurate patients selection could limit the problem of overtreatment, ii) that benign/indolent IPMN have a distinguishable Endocrine/Metabolic/Inflammatory (EMI) profile from those with HGD/IC, and therefore this research has the following three specific aims. Aim 1: To retrospectively evaluate and to validate the updated versions of International and European guidelines for the management of IPMN (Cohort A) Aim 2: To identify pre-operative biological and/or imaging biomarker(s) to distinguish low- versus high-risk IPMN for cancer progression in a prospective study of surgically-resected patients (Cohort B) Aim 2.1: To compare MRI and EUS in the pre-operative evaluation of IPMNs and with respect to pathological findings. In particular, primary endpoint will be the identification of main pancreatic duct involvement. Secondary endpoints will be evaluation of the degree of main duct involvement (extension of IPMN involvement, MPD diameter at predetermined points, maximum diameter of MPD), the presence of thickened ductal walls, mural nodules and the characteristics of the surrounding parenchyma (fatty infiltration/vanishing pancreas). Aim 3: To prospectively validate biological and/or imaging biomarker(s) previously identified (Aim 2) on patients with IPMN undergoing surgical resection (Cohort C)

None listed

Italy