Skip to content

Improving Academic and Social Functioning in Middle-Schoolers With Autism

Improving Academic and Social Functioning in Middle-Schoolers With Autism

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06705907
Enrollment
224
Registered
2024-11-26
Start date
2024-12-01
Completion date
2029-08-31
Last updated
2026-03-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Autism, Autism Spectrum Disorder

Keywords

social skills, executive functions, academic achievement, middle school

Brief summary

The goal of this study is to test how well two group interventions work for middle-school children with Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD). One of the interventions focuses on teaching parents and adolescent skills to help improve their social functioning and the other focuses on teaching parents and adolescents skills to improve organization, planning, and study skills. Eligible participants will be randomly (like a coin flip) assigned to attend one of the two interventions.

Interventions

Intervention targeting academic executive functioning

BEHAVIORALBuilding Essential Social Skills for Teens (BESST)

Intervention targeting social skills

Sponsors

Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati
Lead SponsorOTHER
Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD)
CollaboratorNIH

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
10 Years to 15 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Diagnosis of autism * No intellectual disability * Problems with organization, materials management, and planning and prioritization * Problems with social skills * Fully included in middle school * Stable medication and behavioral treatment regime

Exclusion criteria

* Home schooled * Severe co-occurring psychopathology (e.g., aggression, suicidal) * Non English-speaking

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Functioning, 2nd EditionFrom enrollment to the end of treatment at 8 weeks.The BRIEF-2 assesses real-world EF behaviors in the home and school environments. The T-scores range from 30:99 with higher scores being worse.
Homework Problems ChecklistFrom enrollment to end of treatment at 8 weeks.The HPC assesses Homework Completion and Homework Management. Scores for Homework Completion range from 0 to 36 and for Homework Management from 0 to 21. Lower scores are better.
Academic Performance Rating ScaleFrom enrollment to end of treatment at 8 weeks.The teacher-completed APRS assesses how well the adolescent is performing academically with 3 subscales (Academic Success, Academic Productivity, and Impulse Control). The two scores to be used in the current study include the Academic Success score which ranges from 7 to 35, while the Academic Productivity score ranges from 12 to 60. Higher scores are better.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Children's Organizational Skills ScaleFrom enrollment to the end of treatment at 8 weeks.The COSS is a psychometrically strong rating scale assessing Organized Actions, Task Planning, and Memory \& Materials Management. The T scores for each subscale range from 20 to 83 and higher scores indicate worse functioning.
Weekly Calendar Planning ActivityFrom enrollment to the end of treatment at 8 weeks.The WCPA is an objective measure of metacognition (i.e., planning, inhibition, problem solving, keeping track of rules, and monitoring passage of time) while performing a multiple-step activity (i.e., scheduling multiple appointments while adhering to various rules). The WCPA will report total appointments entered (0 to 10) and total correct appointments entered (0 to 10) with higher values being better.
Social Skills Assessment (TRIAD)From enrollment to the end of treatment at 8 weeks.The TRIAD assesses social skills (i.e., emotion understanding and perspective taking, initiating and ending interactions, responding to others, maintaining interactions and problem solving, and following social rules) rated on a 1 to 4 scale (1=not very well to 4=very well). Items rated 2 or less are considered areas of weakness. Items rated as 3 or above are considered areas of strength.

Countries

United States

Contacts

CONTACTLeanne Tamm, Ph.D.
leanne.tamm@cchmc.org513-803-3176
CONTACTAmie Duncan, Ph.D.
amie.duncan@cchmc.org513-803-2416
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORLeanne Tamm, Ph.D.

Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORAmie Duncan, Ph.D.

Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 18, 2026